Greek · G4106

πλάνη

Objectively, fraudulence; subjectively, a straying from orthodoxy or piety

This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.

πλάνηG4106
Pronunciationplánē

What does πλάνη (plánē) mean in the Bible?

G4106, plánē, is a feminine Greek noun for deception, delusion, error, or a morally consequential wandering from truth. All ten governed New Testament tokens are singular, with nominative, genitive, and dative forms represented.

Reader summary

Full entry for πλάνη (G4106) · Open the biblical lexicon

Questions this entry answers

What does πλάνη (plánē) mean in the Bible?

G4106, plánē, is a feminine Greek noun for deception, delusion, error, or a morally consequential wandering from truth. All ten governed New Testament tokens are singular, with nominative, genitive, and dative forms represented.

How does the BSB render G4106?

The BSB source-word alignment has 10 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include error (4), [the] error (1), deceit (1), deceitful (1), deception (1).

Where does πλάνη (plánē) appear in Scripture?

The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Matthew 27:64. Its strongest book concentrations include 2 Peter (2), 1 John (1), 1 Thessalonians (1), 2 Thessalonians (1).

What This Word Actually Means

G4106, plánē, is a feminine Greek noun for deception, delusion, error, or a morally consequential wandering from truth. All ten governed New Testament tokens are singular, with nominative, genitive, and dative forms represented. The noun can describe a false claim, the operation of deceptive teaching, the error of a person's way, an idolatrous exchange, or a divinely judicial delusion in a defined context.

It does not by itself identify who is deceived, who is accused of deception, whether the accusation is true, or which doctrinal issue is in view. Matthew 27:64 is a crucial restraint because Jesus' opponents call the anticipated resurrection proclamation a further deception. The narrator does not endorse their label. A speaker can use error language falsely against the truth, so readers must distinguish the content of an accusation from the Gospel's judgment of it.

First Thessalonians 2:3 supplies another contrast: Paul's appeal does not arise from error, impurity, or trickery, and the surrounding passage points to a gospel entrusted by God and ministry tested by the One who examines hearts. Ephesians 4:14 places the noun in the danger posed by changing teaching, human cunning, and deceitful scheming. The remedy is not suspicion of every question or difference.

Paul directs the body toward maturity in Christ, truth spoken in love, and the contribution of each part. Second Peter 3:17 similarly warns beloved readers not to be carried away by the error of lawless people and lose stability, then commands growth in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ. These uses concern believers endangered by deception, but they do not define every occurrence.

The current base insight is therefore too narrow when it says the noun always leads believers astray. James 5:20 speaks of turning a sinner from the error of his way. Restoration is the pastoral aim, not triumph over a labeled opponent. The promise that love covers many sins cannot be used to hide abuse, silence witnesses, obstruct lawful reporting, or avoid necessary accountability.

Second Peter 2 and Jude 11 expose teachers whose boastful appeals or profit-seeking follow a destructive course. First John 4:6 tests truth and deception by confession of Christ and apostolic witness within a letter that immediately presses the church toward love. Discernment and love are partners, not rivals. Romans 1:27 and Second Thessalonians 2:11 require special care.

Romans places error within the chapter's account of exchanging God's truth for false worship and its consequences. It does not authorize harassment, speculative identity judgments, or selective condemnation that ignores the chapter's movement toward universal human accountability. Second Thessalonians describes a powerful delusion after a refusal to love the truth, in an eschatological and judicial argument that must not be applied to every ordinary mistake, memory failure, or secondary disagreement.

G4106 supports sober discernment only when teachers identify the claim, evidence, context, moral stakes, and fitting path toward truth.

source_lexicongrammaticalBook contextPastoral applicationCanonical parallel
Sources