Open the Form Guide
See the exact Romans 3:27 form guide with morphology, clause role, and guardrails.
OpenForm Insight
How καύχησις Works in Romans 3:27
A focused form insight on Noun Nominative Singular Feminine in Romans 3:27.
Romans 3:27 - BSB
Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded. On what principle? On that of works? No, but on that of faith.
The Question
How does καύχησις function in Romans 3:27?
Short Answer
καύχησις is a Noun Nominative Singular Feminine in Romans 3:27. The grammar sharpens the rhetorical force of the question by putting boasting in the spotlight as something now excluded.
What the Form Is Doing
καύχησις appears in Romans 3:27 as a Noun Nominative Singular Feminine. It names the boasting raised by the question and answered by the next clause, so the verse treats boasting as excluded.
In this clause the nominative works with the article to present boasting as the subject of inquiry, and the following passive verb answers that it has been excluded.
Why It Matters for Interpretation
The grammar sharpens the rhetorical force of the question by putting boasting in the spotlight as something now excluded.
The nominative noun names boasting as the rhetorical topic that Paul's argument excludes.
Translation Effect
The form directly supports boasting as the named topic in English.
The form guide should support the public Bible reading, not replace it with a private rendering.
What It Does Not Prove
Do not derive from the nominative alone any claim about who is speaking, whether boasting is emotional or moral in every sense, or any theology beyond the stated context.
Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
Nominative form here helps identify the clause's focus, but it does not by itself settle every nuance.
Evidence from the Form Guide
The witness reads καύχησις in Romans 3:27 with the morphology tag "Noun Nominative Singular Feminine"; this guide is limited to that exact occurrence in the Textus Receptus witness.
For teaching or translation, the form clarifies that the verse is asking about boasting itself, not about a person who boasts.
What It Does Not Prove
- Do not derive from the nominative alone any claim about who is speaking, whether boasting is emotional or moral in every sense, or any theology beyond the stated context.
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Nominative form here helps identify the clause's focus, but it does not by itself settle every nuance.
- Feminine gender is grammatical only and should not be turned into a theological gender claim.