Open the Form Guide
See the exact Romans 3:3 form guide with morphology, clause role, and guardrails.
OpenForm Insight
How καταργήσει Works in Romans 3:3
A focused form insight on Verb Third Person Singular Future Active Indicative in Romans 3:3.
Romans 3:3 - BSB
What if some did not have faith? Will their lack of faith nullify God’s faithfulness?
The Question
How does καταργήσει function in Romans 3:3?
Short Answer
καταργήσει is a Verb Third Person Singular Future Active Indicative in Romans 3:3. The form sharpens the rhetorical force of the verse by asking whether unbelief can nullify God's faithfulness, while leaving the answer to context rather than morphology alone.
What the Form Is Doing
καταργήσει appears in Romans 3:3 as a Verb Third Person Singular Future Active Indicative. It functions as the main predicate in the question and carries the idea of making something ineffective, abolished, or null.
The future indicative frames the verbal idea as the expected outcome being questioned. The surrounding words show that the issue is the effect of human unbelief on God's faithfulness, not a general statement about the verb in isolation.
Why It Matters for Interpretation
The form sharpens the rhetorical force of the verse by asking whether unbelief can nullify God's faithfulness, while leaving the answer to context rather than morphology alone.
The future verb frames Paul's question about whether unbelief can nullify God's faithfulness.
Translation Effect
The future verb directly supports English wording such as "will nullify."
The form guide should support the public Bible reading, not replace it with a private rendering.
What It Does Not Prove
Do not derive a doctrine from the tense alone, and do not treat future indicative as proof that the event must occur. Do not read grammatical person or number as a separate theological point.
Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
Future indicative here signals a questioned outcome, not a certainty.
Evidence from the Form Guide
The witness reads καταργήσει in Romans 3:3 within the question, μὴ ἡ ἀπιστία αὐτῶν τὴν πίστιν τοῦ Θεοῦ καταργήσει;
For readers, the form communicates a challenge to the idea that human failure can undo God's commitment. It helps preserve the force of the question without overstating the conclusion.
What It Does Not Prove
- Do not derive a doctrine from the tense alone, and do not treat future indicative as proof that the event must occur. Do not read grammatical person or number as a separate theological point.
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Future indicative here signals a questioned outcome, not a certainty.
- Do not make tense, voice, mood, or person into a standalone theology.