Greek · G141

αἱρετικός

A schismatic

This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through the Connect page. Screenshots are helpful.

αἱρετικός G141
Pronunciation hairetikós

What does αἱρετικός (hairetikós) mean in the Bible?

Hairetikos describes a factious or divisive person, one who persists in choosing and promoting a party-making course. Titus instructs the church to admonish such a person once and twice and then refuse further participation, because the continuing pattern reveals corruption and self-condemnation.

Reader summary

Full entry for αἱρετικός (G141) · Open the biblical lexicon

Questions this entry answers

What does αἱρετικός (hairetikós) mean in the Bible?

Hairetikos describes a factious or divisive person, one who persists in choosing and promoting a party-making course. Titus instructs the church to admonish such a person once and twice and then refuse further participation, because the continuing pattern reveals corruption and self-condemnation.

How does the BSB render G141?

The BSB source-word alignment has 1 aligned row for this entry. Common renderings include a divisive (1).

Where does αἱρετικός (hairetikós) appear in Scripture?

The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Titus 3:10. Its strongest book concentrations include Titus (1).

What This Word Actually Means

Hairetikos describes a factious or divisive person, one who persists in choosing and promoting a party-making course. Titus instructs the church to admonish such a person once and twice and then refuse further participation, because the continuing pattern reveals corruption and self-condemnation. The adjective does not mean anyone who asks difficult questions, reports wrongdoing, differs on a secondary matter, or appeals a leader's decision.

Its immediate context concerns foolish controversies and quarrels that are unprofitable, followed by repeated correction and persistent factional conduct. Churches should identify concrete behavior, doctrine, fruit, and response to admonition before applying the label. The process protects unity through truth and boundaries, not through enforced silence or automatic exclusion at the first disagreement.

Sources