What does כָּחַשׁ (yəkaḥăšû) mean in the Bible?
Kāḥaš describes denial or deception in several selected human contexts, but Habakkuk 3:17 uses the identity for a crop that fails. Sarah denies her laughter because she is afraid in Genesis 18:15.
Kāḥaš describes denial or deception in several selected human contexts, but Habakkuk 3:17 uses the identity for a crop that fails. Sarah denies her laughter because she is afraid in Genesis 18:15.
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.
Reader summary
Full entry for כָּחַשׁ (H3584) · Open the biblical lexicon
Kāḥaš describes denial or deception in several selected human contexts, but Habakkuk 3:17 uses the identity for a crop that fails. Sarah denies her laughter because she is afraid in Genesis 18:15.
The BSB source-word alignment has 22 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include cower (2), and deny You (1), and denying (1), and lies (1), and lying (1).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Genesis 18:15. Its strongest book concentrations include Psalms (4), Leviticus (3), Hosea (2), Job (2).
Kāḥaš describes denial or deception in several selected human contexts, but Habakkuk 3:17 uses the identity for a crop that fails. Sarah denies her laughter because she is afraid in Genesis 18:15. First Kings 13:18 identifies the old prophet's claim about an angel as a lie, despite his religious title and confident account. Leviticus 19:11 prohibits lying and deceiving one's neighbor. Those passages explain the personal acts by their content and circumstances.
Habakkuk's failed olive crop belongs to a description of absent produce and livestock, not an accusation that plants possess dishonest intentions. The contrast keeps teachers from applying the human-deception gloss mechanically wherever the identifier occurs. In personal speech settings, truthfulness cannot be secured merely by a speaker's prestige or invocation of revelation. In a harvest setting, the word describes disappointment or failure, whose moral and theological significance comes from the larger prayer rather than a personified accusation against the crop.
Fearful denial, a prophet's false claim, a command against neighbor deception and failed harvest production illustrate contextual differences. The human uses involve evaluated speech or conduct, while the agricultural use describes absent yield without personal intent.
But Sarah was afraid, so she denied it and said, “I did not laugh.” “No,” replied the Lord, “but you did laugh.”
Sarah's denial follows fear after her laughter is exposed. The Lord corrects the specific account, while the scene should not become permission for readers to assume fear always proves deceit.
Then the prophet replied, “I too am a prophet like you, and an angel spoke to me by the word of the Lord, saying, ‘Bring him back with you to your house, so that he may eat bread and drink water.’” The old prophet was lying to him,
The narrator explicitly identifies a false claim about an angel's message. A prophetic title and asserted revelation do not make the contradictory statement true.
You must not steal. You must not lie or deceive one another.
The prohibition joins stealing, lying and deceiving one another within neighbor responsibilities. Its ethical direction concerns truthful conduct rather than the neutral failure of an object to produce.
Though the fig tree does not bud and no fruit is on the vines, though the olive crop fails and the fields produce no food, though the sheep are cut off from the fold and no cattle are in the stalls,
The olive crop fails among several descriptions of absent food and livestock. The prayer responds with reliance on the Lord rather than attributing deliberate falsehood to plants.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Hebrew word. Betrays trust through false word or failed deed; encompasses both deception and disappointing failure to deliver
Betrays trust through false word or failed deed; encompasses both deception and disappointing failure to deliver
to be untrue, in word (to lie, feign, disown) or deed (to disappoint, fail, cringe) BDB: be disappointing Usage: deceive, deny, dissemble, fail, deal falsely, be found liars, (be-) lie, lying, submit selves.
How the stem changes the meaning of this verb across the biblical text.
This verb appears through different tense, voice, mood, or stem patterns. Those forms help readers see how the action is presented in context.
Selected passage-level study witnesses for this word. This section is not the full occurrence list.
Showing 1 selected witness from 22 lexical occurrence verses.
כָּחַשׁ is a primitive root - no further derivation.
The old prophet's statement in First Kings 13 supplies a concrete warning about claims of religious authority. He identifies himself as a prophet and reports an angelic message, but the narrator says he is lying. The narrative's evaluation comes from the stated contradiction and divine command, not from a general distrust of every religious person. Leviticus' prohibition places truthful dealings within ordinary neighbor responsibilities, where a title cannot excuse deceit.
Habakkuk supplies a different subject and setting. The olive crop fails, and the prayer names several lost sources of sustenance before expressing joy and reliance on the Lord. Reading failed yield as intentional dishonesty would distort the lament's concrete deprivation. Sarah's fearful denial gives another human scene, but does not make fear a reliable diagnostic tool for a teacher judging others. Each use needs its own evidence. Ephesians 4 then connects truthful speech with gracious conduct, supporting responsible correction that does not invent accusations.
1Kgs.13.18
Human denial and deception differ from a crop's failure even when gathered under the same verbal identity. Subject, construction and context determine whether personal truthfulness is at issue; a lookup gloss cannot assign dishonest agency to an olive harvest.
Ephesians 4:25-32 calls for putting away falsehood and speaking truth because believers belong to one another, while also requiring helpful and gracious speech. It supplies a Christian moral comparison to Leviticus' neighbor prohibition. Habakkuk's failed crop remains a distinct nonpersonal usage rather than another example of intentional lying.