Mišḥâ occurs with anointing oil in the selected instructions for Israel's sanctuary and priesthood. Exodus 30 describes a particular fragrant blend dedicated to the Lord's service, used for furnishings and for Aaron and his sons.
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.
Reader summary
Full entry for מִשְׁחָה (H4888) · Open the biblical lexicon
Mišḥâ occurs with anointing oil in the selected instructions for Israel's sanctuary and priesthood. Exodus 30 describes a particular fragrant blend dedicated to the LORD's service, used for furnishings and for Aaron and his sons.
The BSB source-word alignment has 26 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include the anointing (8), anointing (5), for the anointing (3), - (1), and some of the anointing (1).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Exodus 25:6. Its strongest book concentrations include Exodus (15), Leviticus (9), Numbers (2).
Mišḥâ occurs with anointing oil in the selected instructions for Israel's sanctuary and priesthood. Exodus 30 describes a particular fragrant blend dedicated to the Lord's service, used for furnishings and for Aaron and his sons. The instructions regulate its use and forbid treating it as ordinary perfume. The oil's consecrating role comes from God's appointment, not from a general claim that fragrant substances possess spiritual power.
Leviticus 8 narrates Moses carrying out those instructions for the tabernacle and Aaron. Exodus 40 connects anointing with the priests' appointed service. Elsewhere, Leviticus 7:35-36 speaks of the priestly portion in connection with the day of their presentation and anointing; that context should not be forced into the same oil description. Teaching can explain consecration and assigned service without assuming that a modern ceremony grants Aaron's office or places its recipient beyond accountability.
The selected instructions and their enactment concern sacred oil, sanctuary furnishings and priestly service. A priestly-portion context provides a limit against assuming that every related occurrence names the same physical substance or confers identical office.
Prepare from these a sacred anointing oil, a fragrant blend, the work of a perfumer; it will be a sacred anointing oil.
The oil is prepared as a sacred fragrant blend after its ingredients are specified. Its prescribed use and restrictions supply the context for its consecrating function.
And you are to tell the Israelites, ‘This will be My sacred anointing oil for the generations to come.
The oil is designated sacred for Israel's generations, followed by prohibitions on ordinary application and imitation. The designation belongs to this particular sanctuary appointment.
He also poured some of the anointing oil on Aaron’s head and anointed him to consecrate him.
Moses pours the oil on Aaron's head to consecrate him, enacting the priestly instructions. This event identifies an appointed priest rather than a universal technique for acquiring authority.
Anoint them just as you anointed their father, so that they may also serve Me as priests. Their anointing will qualify them for a permanent priesthood throughout their generations.”
The sons' anointing is linked to service in the continuing priesthood. Its generational office must remain within the passage's stated covenant and family setting.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Hebrew word. Anointing as sacred act: consecration through oil, not mere cosmetic practice; establishes covenantal status.
Anointing as sacred act: consecration through oil, not mere cosmetic practice; establishes covenantal status.
unction (the act); by implication, a consecratory gift BDB: ointment Usage: (to be) anointed(-ing), ointment.
How this word appears across different grammatical cases and numbers.
מִשְׁחָה is built from this root:
Compound and idiomatic phrases that include this word. Follow a link to study the phrase and how its parts work together.
Exodus 30 treats the sacred oil with specificity. Ingredients, preparation, recipients and forbidden uses surround its designation. The instruction does not invite readers to separate the substance from God's command and market it as a portable means of receiving spiritual power. Leviticus 8 shows Moses applying it to the tabernacle and Aaron within the commissioning already commanded. Its meaning in that scene is therefore inseparable from appointed service.
Exodus 40 adds the continuing priestly responsibility of Aaron's sons. That historical appointment must not be silently transferred to a modern person simply because anointing language is used. First John 2 speaks of an anointing while warning against deception and calling readers to remain in the truth concerning the Son. It supplies its own context, rather than requiring the reader to reproduce Exodus' recipe. Careful teaching can discuss being set apart while keeping the different substances, recipients, offices and covenant circumstances distinct.
Lev.8.12
Oil-of-anointing expressions characterize the selected passages. The priestly-portion setting of Leviticus 7:35 requires separate explanation; similar source forms and a shared Strong's identifier should not erase the differences between substance, consecration and allocation.
First John 2:20-27 connects its anointing language to truth, remaining in the Son and resistance to deception. It does not direct readers to manufacture Exodus' sacred oil. The comparison may illuminate appointed belonging and service, but different wording and covenant circumstances prevent treating the two contexts as one interchangeable ritual.