Ezra

Ezra 4:6-24

Opposition to God's restoring work often weaponizes accusation and political power, but delay is not defeat when the Lord's purpose still governs the story.

Ezra 4:6-24 (WEB)

6 In the reign of Ahasuerus, in the beginning of his reign, they wrote an accusation against the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem.

7 In the days of Artaxerxes, Bishlam, Mithredath, Tabeel, and the rest of his companions, wrote to Artaxerxes king of Persia; and the writing of the letter was written in Syrian, and delivered in the Syrian language.

8 Rehum the chancellor and Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter against Jerusalem to Artaxerxes the king as follows,

9 then Rehum the chancellor, Shimshai the scribe, and the rest of their companions, the Dinaites, and the Apharsathchites, the Tarpelites, the Apharsites, the Archevites, the Babylonians, the Shushanchites, the Dehaites, the Elamites,

10 and the rest of the nations whom the great and noble Osnappar brought over, and set in the city of Samaria, and in the rest of the country beyond the River, and so forth, wrote.

11 This is the copy of the letter that they sent: To King Artaxerxes, From your servants the men beyond the River.

12 Be it known to the king that the Jews who came up from you have come to us to Jerusalem. They are building the rebellious and bad city, and have finished the walls, and repaired the foundations.

13 Be it known now to the king that if this city is built and the walls finished, they will not pay tribute, custom, or toll, and in the end it will be hurtful to the kings.

14 Now because we eat the salt of the palace, and it is not appropriate for us to see the king’s dishonor, therefore we have sent and informed the king,

15 that search may be made in the book of the records of your fathers. You will see in the book of the records, and know that this city is a rebellious city, and hurtful to kings and provinces, and that they have started rebellions within it in the past. That is why this city was destroyed.

16 We inform the king that, if this city is built and the walls finished, then you will have no possession beyond the River.

17 Then the king sent an answer to Rehum the chancellor, and to Shimshai the scribe, and to the rest of their companions who live in Samaria, and in the rest of the country beyond the River: Peace.

18 The letter which you sent to us has been plainly read before me.

19 I decreed, and search has been made, and it was found that this city has made insurrection against kings in the past, and that rebellion and revolts have been made in it.

20 There have also been mighty kings over Jerusalem, who have ruled over all the country beyond the River; and tribute, custom, and toll, was paid to them.

21 Make a decree now to cause these men to cease, and that this city not be built, until a decree is made by me.

22 Be careful that you not be slack doing so. Why should damage grow to the hurt of the kings?

23 Then when the copy of king Artaxerxes’ letter was read before Rehum, Shimshai the scribe, and their companions, they went in haste to Jerusalem to the Jews, and made them to cease by force of arms.

24 Then work stopped on God’s house which is at Jerusalem. It stopped until the second year of the reign of Darius king of Persia.

Central Idea

Opposition to God's restoring work often weaponizes accusation and political power, but delay is not defeat when the LORD's purpose still governs the story.

Authorial Intent

Ezra broadens the opposition theme by showing how accusations against Jerusalem continued across later Persian reigns, how imperial records and political fear were used to stop rebuilding, and how the temple work remained halted until the second year of Darius.

Literary Context

Following Ezra 4:1-5 (discouragement, fear, and hired counselors from Cyrus to Darius), Ezra 4:6-23 functions as a thematic opposition dossier (Ahasuerus and then Artaxerxes), showcasing how political accusation and administrative process can halt rebuilding. Verse 24 returns the narrative to the temple work in Jerusalem, noting its cessation until the second year of Darius, preparing for the prophetic restart in Ezra 5:1-5.

Historical Context

The passage follows the first opposition unit in Ezra 4:1-5 but expands the theme by referring to accusations and correspondence from later Persian reigns. It shows that resistance to restoration was recurring and politically organized.