Ἐζεκίας (Ezekias) in Matthew 1:10: Noun Nominative Singular Masculine
Ἐζεκίας (Ezekias) in Matthew 1:10
Textual Witness
The witness reads Ἐζεκίας in Matthew 1:10 within the Textus Receptus tradition, so the form is the named person in the transmitted genealogy.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
The form highlights Hezekiah as the subject in the genealogy, but the verse's meaning still depends on the whole sentence and list of descendants.
How To Communicate It
This grammar helps communicate a clear ancestral sequence by marking who is said to be the father in the line.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Masculine gender here is a grammatical class, not a theological gender claim.
- If syntax is limited by context, state only the likely subject function and avoid overprecision.
What Does The Label Mean?
Noun: this form names a person, here the royal figure Hezekiah in the genealogical line.
Nominative: the form usually marks a subject or a predicate role, and here it fits the naming of the one doing the action.
Singular: the form is grammatically singular here, so it refers to one individual person.
Masculine: the noun is in the masculine grammatical class, which only reflects standard Greek agreement and does not by itself make a theological claim.
What The Form Does In This Verse
Ἐζεκίας δὲ ἐγέννησε τὸν
The nominative form works with the verb ἐγέννησε to present Hezekiah as the subject who is said to have fathered the next named descendant.
It functions as the named subject in the genealogy and helps mark the line of descent in the sentence.
It is not an object, and the case alone does not turn the name into a title, a theological symbol, or a different lexical item.
How Much The Form Matters Here
Moderate: The nominative personal name identifies Hezekiah as the subject in a royal genealogy clause.
Nominative personal name as genealogy subject. names the person from whom the next descendant is traced. Attached to the begetting clause in Matthew 1:10. Governed by the finite verb that continues the genealogy. The case identifies clause role; the name's canonical significance comes from the person and genealogy context.
Who is acting in this genealogy clause? The nominative form marks Hezekiah as the named subject of the begetting statement.
Supporting: The nominative case quietly supports English word order by identifying Hezekiah as the subject.
Nominative case identifies the likely subject role but does not make the name into a title or symbol. Masculine gender is grammatical and should not be turned into a theological claim.
Nominative case adds hidden theology: The nominative form identifies Hezekiah's clause role; the genealogy supplies the broader meaning. masculine gender proves a theological point: The masculine label is grammatical for the name and does not add doctrine.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
The witness reads Ἐζεκίας in Matthew 1:10 within the Textus Receptus tradition, so the form is the named person in the transmitted genealogy.
The lexeme is Ἑζεκίας, glossed as Hezekias or Hezekiah, an Israelite king named in the ancestral list.
In this sentence the nominative fits naturally with ἐγέννησε and signals the one from whom the line is traced, while the following accusative marks the child named next.
The verse continues the genealogy by linking Hezekiah to the next generation and then moving on through Manasseh, Amon, and Josiah.
Within Matthew's opening genealogy, the form supports a straightforward succession of names and keeps the focus on the chain of descent.
For readers, the grammar helps show who is acting in the sentence, so the genealogy can be read as a sequence of generational relationships.
Do not derive extra doctrinal meaning from nominative case, singular number, or masculine gender beyond the simple identification of this named person.