ἐκζητῶν (ekzeton) in Romans 3:11: Verb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine

Verb: the form is a participle, so it names an action or state while functioning like a modifier in the clause.

Present: often views the action as in progress, customary, or presently in view. Context decides the exact force.

Active: presents the subject as doing or carrying the action.

Participle: carries a verbal idea while also functioning like an adjective or clause element. Context decides its role.

Nominative: the participle is in nominative form here, which fits the clause's subject-like description with the article.

Singular: the form is singular in this occurrence, matching one described figure rather than a group.

Masculine: the form is masculine in grammar, which here aligns with the article and does not itself make a theological gender claim.

It is attached to the article ὁ in the phrase ὁ ἐκζητῶν τὸν Θεόν.

It is governed by the copular pattern οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ, which presents the participle as a descriptive subject-like phrase rather than a standalone verb.

It functions as a substantive participle, identifying the one who seeks God and completing the clause's description of absence.

It does not by itself state a separate action with a new subject, and it does not change the lemma into another word or force a hidden meaning.

High: The substantive participle is part of Paul's indictment that no one seeks God, so it affects a major theological claim in Romans 3.

Present active substantive participle. identifies the described person whose absence is being asserted. Attached to the article in the phrase about the one seeking God. Governed by the negative existence statement in Romans 3:11. The participle functions like a noun phrase, while still carrying verbal force about seeking.

Who is missing from Paul's description? Paul says there is no one who seeks God; the participle names that missing seeker.

Direct: The substantive participle directly supports wording such as "one who seeks" or "the one seeking."

The present participle should not be isolated from the negative clause and made into a separate timeline claim. The nominative masculine singular form matches the article and described figure; it does not narrow the theological charge to males only.

Present tense proves uninterrupted continuous action: Present aspect views the seeking idea as in view, but the negative clause carries the force of the statement. participle means a hidden command: This participle describes a person in the indictment; it is not an imperative form.

The witnessed form is ἐκζητῶν in Romans 3:11 in the phrase οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ ἐκζητῶν τὸν Θεόν.

The lemma ἐκζητέω means to seek out or search for, and the form keeps that lexical idea while expressing it as a participle.

Present active participle nominative singular masculine with the article gives a person-description, so the clause speaks of someone characterized by seeking God.

In this verse the grammar supports the sense that there is no such person present in view, namely no one who is seeking God.

The form fits the passage's broader argument by contributing to a chain of negative descriptions about human response to God.

For readers and teachers, the participle can be rendered smoothly as 'the one who seeks' or 'the seeker,' while keeping the clause's negative force.

Do not derive from the participle alone a claim about duration, sincerity, merit, or universal theology beyond what the clause and context state.