πᾶν (pan) in Romans 3:19: Adjective Nominative Singular Neuter
πᾶν (pan) in Romans 3:19
Textual Witness
The witness reads πᾶν in Romans 3:19 within the phrase ἵνα πᾶν στόμα φραγῇ.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
The form gives the sentence a comprehensive reach, helping readers hear the purpose clause as directed toward all mouths without exception in the immediate context.
How To Communicate It
In communication, it can be rendered naturally as every or all so that the verse's force remains broad, plain, and contextually grounded.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- The neuter form does not itself make a theological statement about gender.
- Do not overread case or number beyond the clause's clear communicative function.
What Does The Label Mean?
Adjective: the form describes or qualifies a noun rather than naming a thing by itself.
Nominative: the form is in a nominative shape and here works with the clause to mark the item being stated about.
Singular: the form is grammatically singular in this occurrence and focuses on one collective target in context.
Neuter: the form belongs to the neuter grammatical class, which does not by itself make a gendered theological claim.
What The Form Does In This Verse
It is attached to στόμα, giving the phrase πᾶν στόμα.
The ἵνα clause sets its function within the stated purpose, so the phrase points to what is to be silenced.
It qualifies the noun broadly: every mouth, or all mouths as a collective idea, is in view in the purpose statement.
It does not by itself create a separate subject, nor does it change the lemma into another word or add a new event.
How Much The Form Matters Here
High: The adjective makes the silencing of every mouth comprehensive within Paul's purpose statement.
Nominative singular modifier of mouth. qualifies mouth with comprehensive force in the purpose clause. Attached to στόμα. Governed by agreement with the nominative noun phrase. The modifier marks breadth, while the passive verb and purpose clause state what happens to every mouth.
Whose mouth is silenced in the purpose clause? The adjective marks every mouth as included in the silencing language.
Direct: The form directly supports rendering the phrase as every mouth.
The grammar marks comprehensive scope, but the legal and rhetorical force comes from the whole clause.
Neuter singular adjective alone carries the judgment claim: The adjective marks scope; the purpose clause carries the silencing and accountability claim.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
The witness reads πᾶν in Romans 3:19 within the phrase ἵνα πᾶν στόμα φραγῇ.
The lemma πᾶς commonly carries the sense of all, every, or the whole, and here it functions in that broad qualifying way.
The nominative neuter singular form agrees with στόμα and helps present the target as comprehensive, not limited to one mouth.
The clause says the law speaks so that every mouth may be stopped, underscoring universal accountability in the sentence.
This use fits Paul's wider argument by expressing an inclusive reach without requiring a special theological nuance from the form alone.
For readers and teachers, the form supports clear translation as every or all, while preserving the clause's focus on universal silence.
Do not derive a hidden subject, a different lemma, or a gender-based theological claim from this morphology.