מִפֶּ֥שַׁע (mip·pe·ša‘) in Isaiah 53:8: Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
מִפֶּ֥שַׁע (mip·pe·ša‘) in Isaiah 53:8
Source Word
At Isaiah 53:8, the source token מִפֶּ֥שַׁע is H6588, Prep-m | N-msc. The BSB+ word table row therefore anchors this guide.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
For expresses the causal force favored by the clause, even though min often has a basic from relationship. The Servant is cut off from the living and stricken in relation to the rebellion of the speaker's people, sharpening the representative contrast.
How To Communicate It
Show how for the transgression links the people's rebellion to the Servant's blow while preserving the distinction between offender and sufferer.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Do not claim that min alone proves every feature of substitution or that the Servant becomes morally guilty of committing the transgression.
- Min can mark source, separation, or cause; the stricken clause and personal object favor a causal reading here.
- Read for the transgression within Isaiah 53:8 as this H6588 occurrence; broader theology requires the passage.
What Does The Label Mean?
Hebrew-nominal
Noun
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Masculine
Singular
Construct
Preposition m
None
This prepositional noun phrase defines a relationship, so verbal time and aspect come from the surrounding predicates.
The min preposition is joined to a masculine singular noun, creating a causal or source relation within the stricken clause.
What The Form Does In This Verse
The transgression of My people as the stated relation to the Servant's being stricken
The clause explaining why the Servant was cut off and struck
The prefixed min marks the people's transgression as the cause or ground connected with the blow falling on the Servant.
The phrase does not label the Servant himself a transgressor or transfer the people's moral agency to him.
How Much The Form Matters Here
High: The Servant is cut off from the living and stricken in relation to the rebellion of the speaker's people, sharpening the representative contrast.
The min preposition is joined to a masculine singular noun, creating a causal or source relation within the stricken clause.. The prefixed min marks the people's transgression as the cause or ground connected with the blow falling on the Servant.. Attached to the transgression of My people as the stated relation to the Servant's being stricken. Governed by the clause explaining why the Servant was cut off and struck. The phrase does not label the Servant himself a transgressor or transfer the people's moral agency to him.
How does for the transgression connect the people's sin to the Servant's suffering? The min phrase presents their rebellion as the reason or ground associated with the blow that falls on him.
Direct: For expresses the causal force favored by the clause, even though min often has a basic from relationship.
Min can mark source, separation, or cause; the stricken clause and personal object favor a causal reading here. The singular transgression can collect the people's rebellion without implying only one isolated offense.
One preposition proves a full doctrine: The causal link is meaningful, but representative or substitutionary synthesis must use the whole Servant song. bearing relation erases moral distinction: The people commit the transgression; the Servant is the one stricken in relation to it.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
At Isaiah 53:8, the source token מִפֶּ֥שַׁע is H6588, Prep-m | N-msc. The BSB+ word table row therefore anchors this guide.
פֶּשַׁע is the lemma behind for the transgression here. Within Isaiah 53:8, H6588 retains this exact lexical identity.
The min preposition is joined to a masculine singular noun, creating a causal or source relation within the stricken clause.
The Servant is cut off from the living and stricken in relation to the rebellion of the speaker's people, sharpening the representative contrast.
The song connects the Servant's suffering with others' sin, but the precise theological account rests on the whole passage, not this preposition alone.
Show how for the transgression links the people's rebellion to the Servant's blow while preserving the distinction between offender and sufferer.
Do not claim that min alone proves every feature of substitution or that the Servant becomes morally guilty of committing the transgression.