Πέτρου. (Petrou) in John 1:44: Noun Genitive Singular Masculine
Πέτρου. (Petrou) in John 1:44
Textual Witness
The witness reads Πέτρου in John 1:44 within the phrase ἐκ τῆς πόλεως Ἀνδρέου καὶ Πέτρου.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
The form reinforces that Peter is being located within a relational description of place, not introduced as the grammatical center of the clause.
How To Communicate It
In translation and teaching, the form can be rendered naturally as Peter, with the wider phrase showing that the verse is identifying a city associated with him and Andrew.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Genitive case indicates relationship here, but the precise nuance comes from the whole phrase and verse.
- Grammatical gender is only a word-class feature here and should not be turned into a theological gender claim.
What Does The Label Mean?
Noun: the word names a person, and here it is the proper name Peter rather than an action or modifier.
Genitive: the form usually marks a relationship such as source, association, or belonging, and the exact nuance comes from context.
Singular: the form refers to one individual named Peter in this occurrence.
Masculine: the noun belongs to the masculine grammatical class, which by itself does not make a theological claim about gender.
What The Form Does In This Verse
ἐκ τῆς πόλεως Ἀνδρέου καὶ Πέτρου
The genitive form follows the phrase about the city and works within the prepositional expression that describes origin or association. The grammar points to a relationship between Peter and the city named, but it does not by itself specify the full nuance beyond what the sentence provides.
It functions as part of the identifying phrase for the city, presenting Peter as one of the persons associated with that place.
It is not the sentence subject, and it does not by itself turn Peter into a descriptive adjective, separate clause, or new lexical item.
How Much The Form Matters Here
Moderate: The genitive proper name associates Peter with the city named in Philip's background.
Noun genitive singular masculine. associates Peter with the city alongside Andrew. Attached to the city phrase with Andrew and Peter. Governed by the prepositional phrase identifying Philip's city. The form supplies relational identification, not a new clause about Peter.
Who else is associated with the city in the verse? Peter is associated with the city along with Andrew.
Supporting: The genitive relation supports a rendering such as the city of Andrew and Peter.
Genitive relation should be read with the city phrase and not forced into one narrow category. Peter is not the subject of the sentence. Masculine gender is grammatical agreement with the proper noun.
Genitive always means possession: The genitive marks association with the city here, not ownership in a full sense. proper name form creates a new action: The form identifies Peter within the place phrase and does not add a separate event.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
The witness reads Πέτρου in John 1:44 within the phrase ἐκ τῆς πόλεως Ἀνδρέου καὶ Πέτρου.
The lemma is Πέτρος, the proper name Peter, so the form identifies the person named rather than a different word.
The genitive fits the prepositional context and supports reading Peter as one of the associated names in the city reference. It gives relational shape to the phrase, while the preposition and surrounding words supply the main sense.
The verse says Philip was from Bethsaida, from the city of Andrew and Peter. The form helps mark Peter as tied to that city in the narrative description.
Across the Gospel narrative, such naming language serves identification and location, not abstract theology. Here the form contributes to the report of where people came from.
For readers, the form helps the verse communicate place and association clearly. It supports a concise notice about shared hometown or origin.
Do not derive a specific relationship beyond what the phrase states, and do not build a doctrine from the genitive ending alone.