What does נֶגַע (negaʿ) mean in the Bible?
H5061, neḡaʿ, is a Hebrew noun for a blow, affliction, or observable affected condition. The object and passage determine what kind of condition is in view.
A blow (figuratively, infliction); also (by implication) a spot (concretely, a leprous person or dress)
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.
H5061, neḡaʿ, is a Hebrew noun for a blow, affliction, or observable affected condition. The object and passage determine what kind of condition is in view.
Reader summary
Full entry for נֶגַע (H5061) · Open the biblical lexicon
H5061, neḡaʿ, is a Hebrew noun for a blow, affliction, or observable affected condition. The object and passage determine what kind of condition is in view.
The BSB source-word alignment has 78 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include . . . (10), the mildew (10), plague (4), the infection (4), - (2).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Genesis 12:17. Its strongest book concentrations include Leviticus (61), Deuteronomy (4), Psalms (4), 1 Kings (2).
H5061, neḡaʿ, is a Hebrew noun for a blow, affliction, or observable affected condition. The object and passage determine what kind of condition is in view. Genesis can use it for a plague or severe affliction. Deuteronomy can use it in legal language concerning an assault. Leviticus applies it to possible conditions on human skin and also to contamination found in fabric or houses.
Those Levitical passages prescribe careful examination and repeatedly preserve uncertainty before a declaration is made. The term is therefore broader than any one modern disease name and should not automatically be translated into a specific diagnosis. It also does not make every afflicted person morally blameworthy. Clean and unclean classifications belong to the covenantal procedures described in the passage; they are not measures of a person's dignity.
Leviticus 13:2 begins with a condition that may be an infectious skin disease and requires examination. The same chapter applies H5061 to fabric contamination, demonstrating that one human diagnosis cannot govern the range. Deuteronomy 17 uses the noun for assaults in a difficult legal case, while Genesis 12 explicitly identifies plagues and their narrative cause.
Isaiah 53 uses stricken language for the servant and must remain inside that prophetic argument. Faithful interpretation uses passage-specific language, distinguishes observation from diagnosis, preserves uncertainty, and refuses to turn ancient purity procedures into stigma or unsupported modern medical policy.
H5061 ranges across a blow, assault, plague, affliction, possible skin condition, and contamination affecting fabric or a house. Levitical examination, legal context, narrative explanation, and prophetic poetry must remain distinct.
“When someone has a swelling or rash or bright spot on his skin that may be an infectious skin disease, he must be brought to Aaron the priest or to one of his sons who is a priest.
The phrase 'may be' preserves uncertainty and initiates priestly examination rather than announcing a modern diagnosis or a person's moral status.
If any fabric is contaminated with mildew—any wool or linen garment,
A non-human fabric can bear the condition, proving that H5061's range cannot be reduced to one disease affecting human skin.
If a case is too difficult for you to judge, whether the controversy within your gates is regarding bloodshed, lawsuits, or assaults, you must go up to the place the Lord your God will choose.
The legal setting uses the noun for assaults or blows among difficult cases, a sense distinct from Levitical skin and material conditions.
The Lord, however, afflicted Pharaoh and his household with severe plagues because of Abram’s wife Sarai.
The narrative explicitly supplies the severe affliction, its divine agent, and its stated cause, details not available in every illness or plague passage.
By oppression and judgment He was taken away, and who can recount His descendants? For He was cut off from the land of the living; He was stricken for the transgression of My people.
Prophetic usage describes the servant as stricken for the people's transgression and must be interpreted within the entire servant passage.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Hebrew word. Divinely-inflicted suffering that marks the body—plague or leprosy as God's visible judgment and separation.
Divinely-inflicted suffering that marks the body—plague or leprosy as God's visible judgment and separation.
a blow (figuratively, infliction); also (by implication) a spot (concretely, a leprous person or dress) BDB: stroke Usage: plague, sore, stricken, stripe, stroke, wound.
How this word appears across different grammatical cases and numbers.
Selected passage-level study witnesses for this word. This section is not the full occurrence list.
Showing 4 selected witnesses from 78 lexical occurrence verses.
Compound and idiomatic phrases that include this word. Follow a link to study the phrase and how its parts work together.
Leviticus 13:2 begins with observable signs that may be an infectious skin condition and requires priestly examination. The wording preserves uncertainty, and later procedures include observation over time before classification. Verse 47 applies H5061 to a contaminated fabric, while chapter 14 can address a house. Those objects make it impossible to map the noun directly onto one modern human disease.
Clean and unclean are covenant ritual classifications, not grades of dignity or proof of personal guilt. Deuteronomy 17:8 uses the noun in legal language for assaults, showing another distinct sense. Genesis 12:17 narrates severe plagues on Pharaoh's household and explicitly gives a cause in that story. Readers must not carry that stated causal link into an illness where Scripture gives none.
Isaiah 53:8 says the servant was stricken for the people's transgression within the servant song's representative suffering and vindication. It does not authorize blaming a sick person or treating illness as atoning. H5061 encourages careful observation, accurate language, patient review, and humility about what is not known. Churches should resist obsolete labels, honor medical expertise, protect privacy, and distinguish infection control from exclusion based on fear.
Ancient priestly procedures can illuminate careful classification but cannot be copied as a modern diagnosis, public-health rule, or church discipline policy.
Lev.13.2
H5061 is a masculine Hebrew noun related to contact or striking language. Its concrete referent changes across assaults, severe afflictions, skin observations, fabric or house contamination, and prophetic description, so translation must follow object and genre.
The Old Testament treats ritual classification, bodily conditions, material contamination, legal assault, and divine affliction in distinct contexts. The Gospels show Jesus approaching sufferers with authority and compassion, while apostolic teaching preserves dignity and communal care. Canonical connection must not erase the different Hebrew and Greek health vocabularies.