Greek · G1256

διαλέγομαι

To dispute

This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.

διαλέγομαιG1256
Pronunciationdialégomai

What does διαλέγομαι (dialégomai) mean in the Bible?

G1256 describes sustained verbal engagement and can refer to reasoning from Scripture, public discussion, extended teaching, argument over status, or formal dispute. The verb does not determine whether a conversation is faithful; subject, content, manner, audience, and outcome distinguish patient explanation from prideful quarrel or harmful agitation.

Reader summary

Full entry for διαλέγομαι (G1256) · Open the biblical lexicon

Questions this entry answers

What does διαλέγομαι (dialégomai) mean in the Bible?

G1256 describes sustained verbal engagement and can refer to reasoning from Scripture, public discussion, extended teaching, argument over status, or formal dispute. The verb does not determine whether a conversation is faithful; subject, content, manner, audience, and outcome distinguish patient explanation from prideful quarrel or harmful agitation.

How does the BSB render G1256?

The BSB source-word alignment has 13 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include he reasoned (3), [and] reasoned (1), addresses (1), arguing (1), debating (1).

Where does διαλέγομαι (dialégomai) appear in Scripture?

The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Mark 9:34. Its strongest book concentrations include Acts (10), Hebrews (1), Jude (1), Mark (1).

What This Word Actually Means

G1256 describes sustained verbal engagement and can refer to reasoning from Scripture, public discussion, extended teaching, argument over status, or formal dispute. The verb does not determine whether a conversation is faithful; subject, content, manner, audience, and outcome distinguish patient explanation from prideful quarrel or harmful agitation. In Acts.

17. 2, Following his synagogue custom, Paul reasons from the Scriptures over three Sabbaths as he explains and proves the Messiahs suffering and resurrection. In Mark. 9. 34, the disciples fall silent when Jesus asks about their road discussion because they had been arguing over which of them was greatest. G1256 opens teaching on conversation that takes truth seriously, reasons from Scripture, addresses righteousness and judgment, and remains alert to the pride that turns discussion into rivalry.

It corrects both anti-intellectual faith that avoids questions and combative habits that treat winning, volume, or humiliation as evidence that truth has been served. G1256 presents discussion as morally shaped action: Paul reasons from the Scriptures about the Messiah, the disciples argue over which of them is greatest, and Felix becomes afraid as Paul explains righteousness, self-control, and coming judgment.

The same conversational capacity can serve gospel witness, expose pride, or confront a conscience, depending on content and posture. For G1256, responsible teaching keeps lexical meaning, passage context, canonical synthesis, and present application distinguishable. G1256 does not promise that sound reasoning will persuade every hearer, authorize endless confrontation, or make a teachers endurance, platform, or rhetorical dominance proof of faithfulness.

Sources