δύναται (dunatai) in Matthew 5:14: Verb Third Person Singular Present Middle or Passive Deponent Indicative
δύναται (dunatai) in Matthew 5:14
Textual Witness
The witness reads δύναται in Matthew 5:14.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
Makes the city comparison an impossibility statement.
How To Communicate It
Use it to explain the cannot in the city comparison.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Keep the form tied to Matthew 5:14.
- Do not detach it from the city comparison in Matthew 5:14.
- Do not use morphology alone to build a complete doctrinal claim.
What Does The Label Mean?
Verb: the form names an action, state, or verbal relationship in the clause.
Present: read the tense and aspect from this occurrence, with the sentence controlling the exact force.
Middle: voice should be read from the morphology label and clause context.
Indicative: mood should serve the sentence rather than override it.
Person: the form includes person marking, so the clause identifies the grammatical subject through the verb ending.
Not applicable: this verb form is not using noun case to mark its sentence role.
Singular: the form is marked for a single grammatical subject or referent.
Not applicable: this verb form does not use grammatical gender to make its point.
What The Form Does In This Verse
Be hidden
The city comparison in Matthew 5:14
States that the visible city is not able to be hidden.
Do not turn ability language into a detached claim about human power.
How Much The Form Matters Here
Medium: visibility warning
Negated ability verb. states what cannot happen to the city. Attached to be hidden. Governed by the city comparison in Matthew 5:14. Read with a city set on a hill cannot be hidden.
Can the city in the comparison be hidden? No. The verb states that it cannot be hidden.
Direct: The form supports cannot or is not able.
This occurrence must be read within Matthew 5:14, not as a standalone word study.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
The witness reads δύναται in Matthew 5:14.
The lemma means to be able, and here it is negated to say the city cannot be hidden.
The finite verb works with the passive infinitive to state impossibility within the comparison.
Jesus uses the city image to press the public visibility of the light saying.
The form supports visible witness without expanding the city into a full allegory.
Use it to explain the cannot in the city comparison.
Do not build a doctrine of visibility from this verb apart from the image.