Greek Form Guide

δύναμις (dunamis) in Matthew 6:13: Noun Nominative Singular Feminine

δύναμις (dunamis) in Matthew 6:13

Textual Witness

δύναμις dunamis Noun Nominative Singular Feminine

The witness places δύναμις in Matthew 6:13 within the textus receptus reading: ἡ δύναμις follows ἡ βασιλεία and joins the closing doxology.

How The Form Affects Interpretation

The form reinforces that the verse ends in praise and confession: power is named as belonging to God, not as a human resource or detached concept.

How To Communicate It

In teaching or translation, this form supports rendering the phrase plainly as 'the power' within the doxology, preserving the verse's worshipful tone.

What Not To Say

  • Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
  • Nominative singular here supports the clause, but it does not by itself prove every nuance of syntax or theology.
  • Feminine grammatical gender is a language category only and should not be turned into a gendered doctrinal claim.

What Does The Label Mean?

Part of Speech

Noun: the word names an abstract reality, here power or might, rather than an action or modifier.

Case

Nominative: the form fits the coordinated praise statement with kingdom and glory in the closing doxology.

Number

Singular: the form is grammatically singular in this occurrence, presenting power as one shared item in the doxology.

Gender

Feminine: the noun belongs to the feminine grammatical class, which is a language feature and not a theological gender claim.

What The Form Does In This Verse

Attached To

ἡ δύναμις

Governed By

The nominative form is governed by its clause role rather than by a preposition. This form functions as one element in the subject-complement style declaration that God's is the kingdom, the power, and the glory.

Role In The Phrase

It functions as one element in the subject-complement style declaration that God's is the kingdom, the power, and the glory.

What It Is Not Doing

It is not a verb, not an object of εἰσενέγκῃς or ῥῦσαι, and not a stand-alone technical term that replaces the surrounding praise.

How Much The Form Matters Here

Interpretive Weight

Moderate: The noun is one element in the closing doxology, naming power as belonging to God.

Syntax Profile

Nominative singular feminine noun in a doxological attribution. names power as part of what belongs to God. Attached to the coordinated kingdom, power, and glory series. Governed by the clause that attributes these realities to God. The nominative form participates in praise language; the clause supplies the attribution.

Reader Question

What is being attributed to God? Power is named alongside kingdom and glory.

Translation Effect

Direct: The form directly supports rendering the doxology with "the power."

Where Caution Is Needed

The feminine noun class is grammatical, not a gendered claim. The doxology's praise function should govern how much syntactic precision is pressed.

Fallacies To Avoid

Nominative or gender overclaim: Do not make case or grammatical gender carry more theology than the doxology states.

How The Interpretation Is Derived

Textual Witness

The witness places δύναμις in Matthew 6:13 within the textus receptus reading: ἡ δύναμις follows ἡ βασιλεία and joins the closing doxology.

Lexical Identity

The lemma δύναμις commonly means power, might, or ability, so the form naturally contributes the idea of divine power in this context.

Grammar In Context

Its nominative singular form, with the article, fits a coordinated praise series after σοῦ ἐστιν. Grammar here supports attribution, not a separate action or command.

Passage Meaning

In this verse, the line confesses that God's rule, power, and glory belong to him, grounding the prayer's plea for rescue in his sufficiency.

Canonical Fit

The term fits the wider biblical pattern that God's effective power is central to rule, rescue, and faithful prayer, but the immediate context controls the emphasis.

Communication Use

For readers, the form helps the verse sound like a doxology, a brief declaration of God's owned attributes rather than a description of human ability.

Do Not Derive

Do not infer a separate doctrine from case alone, do not make grammatical gender into theology, and do not treat the form as changing the lemma into another word.