What does חָשַׂךְ (chasak) mean in the Bible?
Ḥāśak names holding back or withholding, but restraint is evaluated by what is prevented or refused. Genesis 20:6 says God kept Abimelech from sinning against Him and did not permit him to touch Sarah.
Ḥāśak names holding back or withholding, but restraint is evaluated by what is prevented or refused. Genesis 20:6 says God kept Abimelech from sinning against Him and did not permit him to touch Sarah.
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.
Reader summary
Full entry for חָשַׂךְ (H2820) · Open the biblical lexicon
Ḥāśak names holding back or withholding, but restraint is evaluated by what is prevented or refused. Genesis 20:6 says God kept Abimelech from sinning against Him and did not permit him to touch Sarah.
The BSB source-word alignment has 28 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include hold back (2), withheld (2), . . . (1), and restrain (1), another withholds (1).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Genesis 20:6. Its strongest book concentrations include Job (7), Proverbs (6), Genesis (4), Isaiah (3).
Ḥāśak names holding back or withholding, but restraint is evaluated by what is prevented or refused. Genesis 20:6 says God kept Abimelech from sinning against Him and did not permit him to touch Sarah. The next command still requires returning Abraham's wife. Divine restraint in that encounter does not erase the obligation to correct the situation or make the king's incomplete knowledge its own permission.
Proverbs 10:19 commends restraining one's lips amid the danger of excessive words, whereas Proverbs 21:26 describes the righteous person giving without restraint. Isaiah 58:1 commands the prophetic voice not to hold back in declaring transgression, followed by exposure of fasting accompanied by oppression and violence. Teaching must therefore distinguish curbing harmful speech from withholding needed truth or generosity. The verb does not make silence always wise, unlimited speech always courageous or every refusal to give a prudent act.
God's prevention of wrongdoing, prudent speech restraint, unrestrained generosity and the command to declare transgression show different objects and purposes. Holding back receives its moral evaluation from what is restrained or withheld in that passage.
Then God said to Abimelech in the dream, “Yes, I know that you did this with a clear conscience, and so I have kept you from sinning against Me. That is why I did not let you touch her.
God states that He kept Abimelech from sinning and touching Sarah. The subsequent requirement to return her remains part of the encounter and its responsible response.
When words are many, sin is unavoidable, but he who restrains his lips is wise.
Restrained lips are commended where multiplying words is associated with sin. This instruction concerns prudent speech rather than a universal command never to speak about wrongdoing.
All day long he covets more, but the righteous give without restraint.
The righteous person gives without restraint in contrast with continual craving. The positive description prevents equating every withholding action with wise self-control.
“Cry aloud, do not hold back! Raise your voice like a ram’s horn. Declare to My people their transgression and to the house of Jacob their sins.
The prophet is told not to hold back when declaring transgression. The following exposure of oppressed workers and violent fasting keeps that speech attached to concrete wrongdoing.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Hebrew word. Restraint exercised with intention: withholding action (spare, refrain) or withholding judgment (punish, preserve).
Restraint exercised with intention: withholding action (spare, refrain) or withholding judgment (punish, preserve).
to restrain or (reflex.) refrain; by implication, to refuse, spare, preserve; to observe BDB: withhold Usage: assuage, × darken, forbear, hinder, hold back, keep (back), punish, refrain, reserve, spare, withhold.
How the stem changes the meaning of this verb across the biblical text.
This verb appears through different tense, voice, mood, or stem patterns. Those forms help readers see how the action is presented in context.
Selected passage-level study witnesses for this word. This section is not the full occurrence list.
Showing 1 selected witness from 27 lexical occurrence verses.
חָשַׂךְ is built from this root:
The word highlights deliberate control over speech as an expression of wisdom.Proverbs 10:19
Compound and idiomatic phrases that include this word. Follow a link to study the phrase and how its parts work together.
Genesis 20 presents restraint as God's prevention of a specific wrong, followed by a command that restores the disputed relationship. It does not make noncompletion of the wrong a reason to leave the situation unresolved. Proverbs offers another direct distinction: curbing excessive words is wise, while giving without restraint is commended in the context of righteous generosity. The same verb cannot supply one blanket verdict for every act of holding back.
Isaiah 58 commands speech that is not held back because religious practice has coexisted with oppression, contention and violence. That commission cannot be replaced by a generic instruction to stay quiet, yet it also does not authorize inventing accusations or humiliating a vulnerable person. Romans 12's prohibition on personal vengeance alongside care for enemies provides a Christian comparison for restraint joined to active good. The reader should ask what conduct is prevented, whose need is met and what truth must be spoken before praising either silence or forceful speech.
Prov.10.19
Restrain, withhold and hold back express a relationship to an action or object. Positive and negative instructions depend on that complement: curbing words, not withholding gifts and not holding back declared transgression cannot be treated as one fixed moral sense.
Romans 12:17-21 combines refraining from revenge with positive care for an enemy. It helps readers see that restraint can accompany active generosity rather than passive withdrawal. The comparison does not make ḥāśak a direct Greek equivalent or require silence when a passage calls for truthful exposure of wrongdoing.