לֵאמֹ֗ר (lê·mōr) in Deuteronomy 30:13: Preposition-l | Verb - Qal - Infinitive construct

Hebrew-verb

Verb

Preposition-l | Verb - Qal - Infinitive construct

Qal

Inf

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Lamed preposition

None

Here the preposition lamed joins the Qal infinitive construct to a second imagined speech scene, this time after the command is said not to lie beyond the sea. English renders the speech introduction as that you should need to ask, although no pronoun is suffixed to the Hebrew token.

The form signals the maritime question whose proposed crossing, retrieval, and proclamation are all unnecessary for covenant obedience.

The denial that someone must cross the sea to secure and announce the command

The paired distance images that clear away imagined barriers before Moses declares the word very near

The form signals the maritime question whose proposed crossing, retrieval, and proclamation are all unnecessary for covenant obedience.

The form does not forbid travel, make the sea inherently opposed to revelation, or include the question's speaker in its morphology.

High: This occurrence extends the accessibility claim across the sea and helps the paired questions make the word's nearness unmistakable.

Here the preposition lamed joins the Qal infinitive construct to a second imagined speech scene, this time after the command is said not to lie beyond the sea. English renders the speech introduction as that you should need to ask, although no pronoun is suffixed to the Hebrew token.. The form signals the maritime question whose proposed crossing, retrieval, and proclamation are all unnecessary for covenant obedience.. Attached to the denial that someone must cross the sea to secure and announce the command. Governed by the paired distance images that clear away imagined barriers before Moses declares the word very near. The form does not forbid travel, make the sea inherently opposed to revelation, or include the question's speaker in its morphology.

What obstacle does the imagined question in Deuteronomy 30:13 raise? It supposes that someone must cross the sea, bring the command back, and proclaim it, an obstacle the surrounding argument denies.

Direct: The Hebrew form introduces saying, and the BSB's need to ask communicates why the proposed sea journey would be imagined; you is supplied from the addressed discourse.

The second occurrence repeats the same form but introduces a different geographical objection. Natural English supplies need and the addressee; the Hebrew infinitive itself simply frames the saying that follows.

The repeated form assumed to add nothing, so the heaven and sea images are collapsed without tracing their distinct rhetorical reach: Do not confuse the removal of a remote-retrieval barrier with a claim that understanding and obedience are effortless. that you should need to ask used to dismiss careful interpretation or any practical cost involved in obeying the command: Keep "that you should need to ask" connected to לֵאמֹ֗ר, row 5, and the full Deuteronomy 30:13 clause.

Deuteronomy 30:13 row 5 aligns H559 with that you should need to ask before the question about crossing the sea.

This row 5 H559 occurrence introduces the beyond-the-sea objection, complementing but not duplicating the ascent question of Deuteronomy 30:12.

Here the preposition lamed joins the Qal infinitive construct to a second imagined speech scene, this time after the command is said not to lie beyond the sea. English renders the speech introduction as that you should need to ask, although no pronoun is suffixed to the Hebrew token.

Deuteronomy 30:13 extends the accessibility argument from heaven to the far side of the sea, preparing the conclusion that the word is present in mouth and heart.

This sea image serves the local rhetoric of a reachable covenant command; it should not become a general promise that difficult interpretation or faithful obedience requires no effort.

Compare the sea question with the prior heaven question, keep the infinitive as a speech introduction, and move to the near word of verse 14 as the shared answer.

Do not confuse the removal of a remote-retrieval barrier with a claim that understanding and obedience are effortless.