וַֽיְשַׁלְּחֵ֛הוּ (way·šal·lə·ḥê·hū) in Genesis 3:23: Conjunctive waw | Verb - Piel - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular | third person masculine singular
וַֽיְשַׁלְּחֵ֛הוּ (way·šal·lə·ḥê·hū) in Genesis 3:23
Source Word
Genesis 3:23 row 3 aligns the waw-linked H7971 Piel form and masculine singular suffix with banished him.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
Banished him identifies both divine agency and the man who is removed, allowing the following work-the-ground clause to be heard as life now carried on outside Eden. Banished communicates the contextual force of H7971 in this judgment scene, and him directly renders the attached masculine singular suffix.
How To Communicate It
Follow the judgment sequence into the finite verb, resolve him to the man, and continue through the ground clause and guarded-garden scene before drawing wider exile themes.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Do not turn the Piel stem into a universal rule for punitive sending or build the whole theology of exile from this morphology label alone.
- The masculine singular suffix points to the man in the immediate wording; the verse's broader human consequences must be traced through the complete narrative.
- The form does not make every act of sending punitive, place the woman outside the judgment scene by grammatical inference, or explain the whole doctrine of exile by itself.
What Does The Label Mean?
Hebrew-verb
Verb
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Piel - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular | third person masculine singular
Piel
ConsecImperf
Third
Masculine
Singular
Not applicable
Waw conjunction
Third person masculine singular
The waw-linked Piel consecutive imperfect advances the judgment scene with the Lord God as the masculine singular subject and a masculine singular suffix referring to the man. The form reports his removal from the garden before the verse names his work outside it.
The finite form carries the narrative into expulsion, keeping the Lord God as agent and the man as the suffix-marked person sent away.
What The Form Does In This Verse
The Lord God's removal of the man from the Garden of Eden after the judgment pronouncements
The consequence sequence that moves from lost access to the tree of life toward work on the ground from which the man was taken
The finite form carries the narrative into expulsion, keeping the Lord God as agent and the man as the suffix-marked person sent away.
The form does not make every act of sending punitive, place the woman outside the judgment scene by grammatical inference, or explain the whole doctrine of exile by itself.
How Much The Form Matters Here
High: The form marks the decisive movement from Eden to the ground outside and keeps divine agency and the expelled man grammatically visible.
The waw-linked Piel consecutive imperfect advances the judgment scene with the Lord God as the masculine singular subject and a masculine singular suffix referring to the man. The form reports his removal from the garden before the verse names his work outside it.. The finite form carries the narrative into expulsion, keeping the Lord God as agent and the man as the suffix-marked person sent away.. Attached to the Lord God's removal of the man from the Garden of Eden after the judgment pronouncements. Governed by the consequence sequence that moves from lost access to the tree of life toward work on the ground from which the man was taken. The form does not make every act of sending punitive, place the woman outside the judgment scene by grammatical inference, or explain the whole doctrine of exile by itself.
Who banishes whom in Genesis 3:23, and where does the man go? The Lord God removes the man from the Garden of Eden, and the rest of the verse places him at work on the ground from which he was taken.
Direct: Banished communicates the contextual force of H7971 in this judgment scene, and him directly renders the attached masculine singular suffix.
The masculine singular suffix points to the man in the immediate wording; the verse's broader human consequences must be traced through the complete narrative. Banished reflects the severe contextual sense of sending here, not an automatic meaning of the Piel stem in every H7971 occurrence.
The suffix treated as an unnamed group or the consecutive form detached from the preceding judgment sequence: Do not turn the Piel stem into a universal rule for punitive sending or build the whole theology of exile from this morphology label alone. banished him generalized into a claim that every sending by God is rejection: Keep "banished him" connected to וַֽיְשַׁלְּחֵ֛הוּ, row 3, and the full Genesis 3:23 clause.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
Genesis 3:23 row 3 aligns the waw-linked H7971 Piel form and masculine singular suffix with banished him.
This row 3 H7971 witness concerns the man's removal from Eden, distinct from urgent release, military dispatch, or ordinary sending elsewhere.
The waw-linked Piel consecutive imperfect advances the judgment scene with the Lord God as the masculine singular subject and a masculine singular suffix referring to the man. The form reports his removal from the garden before the verse names his work outside it.
Genesis 3:22-24 presents removal from Eden and guarded access to the tree of life as consequences of human rebellion, while Genesis 3:23 sends the man to work the ground of his origin.
This banishment belongs to Eden's judgment narrative; later biblical exile and restoration themes may echo it, but those connections require their own textual evidence.
Follow the judgment sequence into the finite verb, resolve him to the man, and continue through the ground clause and guarded-garden scene before drawing wider exile themes.
Do not turn the Piel stem into a universal rule for punitive sending or build the whole theology of exile from this morphology label alone.