Greek Form Guide

ἡμέραν (emeran) in John 1:39: Noun Accusative Singular Feminine

ἡμέραν (emeran) in John 1:39

Textual Witness

ἡμέραν emeran Noun Accusative Singular Feminine

The witness reads ἡμέραν in John 1:39 within the sequence, παρ' αὐτῷ ἔμειναν τὴν ἡμέραν ἐκείνην.

How The Form Affects Interpretation

The grammar makes the stay feel specific and bounded: one particular day, not an open-ended visit.

How To Communicate It

This helps the reader hear the narrative as a brief, concrete encounter that led to further following.

What Not To Say

  • Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
  • Accusative singular here describes the phrase's time force, but it does not by itself settle every nuance of duration.
  • Feminine gender is grammatical classification, not a theological gender statement.

What Does The Label Mean?

Part of Speech

Noun: this form names a day as a time span or calendar unit, depending on context.

Case

Accusative: the form commonly marks a direct object, extent of time, or other object-like relation in the clause.

Number

Singular: the noun is grammatically singular here, pointing to one day in view.

Gender

Feminine: the noun belongs to the feminine grammatical class, which here is a lexical feature and not a theological gender claim.

What The Form Does In This Verse

Attached To

ἔμειναν ... τὴν ἡμέραν ἐκείνην

Governed By

The noun is used with the article and demonstrative inside the phrase that tells how long they stayed, so the grammar supports a time expression rather than a new subject.

Role In The Phrase

It functions as the time span of their staying with him, expressing that they remained for that day.

What It Is Not Doing

It is not acting as the subject of the sentence, and the accusative form does not by itself require a special theological or symbolic reading.

How Much The Form Matters Here

Interpretive Weight

Moderate: The accusative time expression makes the disciples' stay concrete and bounded in the narrative.

Syntax Profile

Accusative noun used for duration. marks the time span of the stay rather than naming a subject or object. Attached to the phrase saying they remained with him that day. Governed by the verb describing their remaining with Jesus. The accusative time use supports narrative concreteness without requiring hidden symbolism.

Reader Question

How long did they stay? The form contributes the time expression that they remained with him that day.

Translation Effect

Direct: The accusative time expression directly supports a rendering such as 'that day' or 'for that day.'

Where Caution Is Needed

Accusative case here marks duration or time span, not a direct object. The specific day is narrative detail and should not be overread as hidden symbolism.

Fallacies To Avoid

Accusative always marks direct object: Here the accusative noun functions as a time expression after the verb remained. day must be symbolic: The form supplies concrete narrative time unless the context gives stronger symbolic reasons.

How The Interpretation Is Derived

Textual Witness

The witness reads ἡμέραν in John 1:39 within the sequence, παρ' αὐτῷ ἔμειναν τὴν ἡμέραν ἐκείνην.

Lexical Identity

The lexical item is ἡμέρα, 'day', a common noun for daytime, a civil day, or a broader time reference depending on context.

Grammar In Context

Here the accusative singular with article and demonstrative naturally fits a duration or time span after the verb remained, so the phrase communicates the length of their stay.

Passage Meaning

The verse says the disciples accepted Jesus' invitation, went with him, saw where he stayed, and remained with him for that day.

Canonical Fit

This use fits ordinary narrative Greek where time words in the accusative can mark duration without needing special emphasis beyond the story itself.

Communication Use

For translation and teaching, the form supports wording such as 'they stayed with him that day' or 'they remained with him for that day.'

Do Not Derive

Do not derive a hidden doctrinal claim, a technical temporal theory, or a different lemma from this case form alone.