Greek Form Guide

ἱερεῖς (iereis) in John 1:19: Noun Accusative Plural Masculine

ἱερεῖς (iereis) in John 1:19

Textual Witness

ἱερεῖς iereis Noun Accusative Plural Masculine

The witness reads ἱερεῖς in John 1:19 within the phrase ἐξ Ἱεροσολύμων ἱερεῖς καὶ Λευΐτας, showing a plural priestly group in the delegation.

How The Form Affects Interpretation

The form contributes to the sense of an organized delegation and keeps attention on the identity of the envoys in John's testimony scene.

How To Communicate It

For readers and teachers, the form can be explained simply as the plural priest group involved in the mission, which helps the verse read naturally and clearly.

What Not To Say

  • Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
  • Accusative plural here signals a group in the clause, but the verse context controls the exact relationship to the verb.
  • Masculine grammatical gender is a form label only and does not create a theological gender claim.

What Does The Label Mean?

Part of Speech

Noun: this form names a class of persons, here priests, rather than an action or modifier.

Case

Accusative: this form commonly marks a direct object or another context-governed target of the verb or participle.

Number

Plural: this form refers to more than one priest in the scene, as the context shows a group sent from Jerusalem.

Gender

Masculine: this is the noun's grammatical class in this form, and it does not by itself make a theological claim about sex or status.

What The Form Does In This Verse

Attached To

ἀπέστειλαν ... ἱερεῖς καὶ Λευΐτας

Governed By

The accusative form fits the sending and purpose structure by presenting the priests as part of the delegated group connected to the verb, without forcing a more precise syntactic label than the verse context supports.

Role In The Phrase

It identifies the priests as members of the group sent by the Jews from Jerusalem to question John.

What It Is Not Doing

It should not be read as changing the noun into a different lemma, and it should not be pressed beyond the local sentence role suggested by the clause.

How Much The Form Matters Here

Interpretive Weight

Moderate: The noun identifies part of the delegation sent to question John.

Syntax Profile

Accusative plural masculine noun in a sending clause. names the people sent. Attached to the priests and Levites delegation. Governed by the sending verb from Jerusalem. The accusative plural marks members of the sent group; the narrative context explains their purpose.

Reader Question

Who was sent to question John? Priests, along with Levites, were sent from Jerusalem.

Translation Effect

Direct: The form directly supports plural object wording such as "priests."

Where Caution Is Needed

The masculine noun class is grammatical and should not be made into a broader theological claim. The case identifies the group in the sending scene, not every detail of authority.

Fallacies To Avoid

Case proves authority: Do not derive hierarchy or authority from accusative case alone.

How The Interpretation Is Derived

Textual Witness

The witness reads ἱερεῖς in John 1:19 within the phrase ἐξ Ἱεροσολύμων ἱερεῖς καὶ Λευΐτας, showing a plural priestly group in the delegation.

Lexical Identity

The lemma ἱερεύς means a priest, and the form here keeps that identity while expressing plural accusative morphology.

Grammar In Context

The accusative plural fits the verse's mission scene and supports the picture of a group sent to John, but the surrounding clause and purpose statement determine the communicative force.

Passage Meaning

The verse says that Jewish authorities sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to question John about his identity.

Canonical Fit

Within the Gospel, this opening inquiry prepares the public witness theme by showing official representatives asking about John's role.

Communication Use

A reader can hear the verse as a report of delegated questioning, with the form helping to mark the personnel involved in the inquiry.

Do Not Derive

Do not derive hierarchy, theology, or special authority from the case ending alone, and do not treat the morphology as overriding the narrative context.