κρύσταλλον, (krustallon) in Revelation 22:1: Noun Accusative Singular Masculine

Noun: the word names a thing or material image, here the crystal-like quality of the river's appearance.

Accusative: the form usually marks a direct object or another dependent role, and here it works within a comparison.

Singular: the form is grammatically singular in this occurrence, presenting one image rather than many.

Masculine: the noun belongs to the masculine grammatical class in this lexicon, which does not by itself assign a theological gender or personal identity.

λαμπρὸν ὡς κρύσταλλον

The comparison marker ὡς and the adjectival phrase around it frame κρύσταλλον as the standard of likeness, not as the main object of the sentence.

It contributes a vivid comparison, saying the river was bright like crystal and helping the reader picture clarity and brilliance.

It is not the subject of the clause, and it should not be treated as if the grammar alone were naming a separate river or changing the meaning of the noun.

Moderate: The form supplies the concrete standard of comparison for the river's brightness and clarity.

Accusative noun within a comparison after ὡς. functions as the image used to describe the river's bright appearance. Attached to λαμπρὸν ὡς κρύσταλλον. Governed by the comparison marker ὡς. The form supports the comparison; it does not introduce a separate object or a second river.

What image describes the river's brightness? The accusative noun names crystal as the comparison that pictures the river's brightness.

Direct: The comparison directly affects the English rendering as like crystal.

The noun functions in a simile and should not be treated as a separate main object. The imagery supports clarity and brilliance, but the verse's main movement is the river coming from the throne.

Imagery becomes a separate object claim: The comparison describes the river's appearance; it does not add another entity to the scene. accusative case alone decides the sentence emphasis: The case helps the comparison, but the full clause controls the emphasis.

In the provided TR/Scrivener witness, the surface form is κρύσταλλον in Revelation 22:1.

The lemma κρύσταλλος means crystal, so the word contributes a material image of transparency and brilliance.

Its accusative singular form fits the comparison phrase and serves the clause by expressing likeness rather than direct action.

The verse presents the river of life as pure, bright, and visually crystal-like as it comes from God's throne and the Lamb's throne.

The same image type coheres with the book's wider symbolic portrayal of clarity, purity, and heavenly splendor without forcing extra claims from morphology.

For teaching or translation, the form supports wording such as bright like crystal, keeping the image vivid and restrained.

Do not derive that the noun itself is the subject, that the case creates a theological point, or that grammatical gender carries doctrinal meaning.