πᾶν (pan) in Revelation 22:3: Adjective Nominative Singular Neuter
πᾶν (pan) in Revelation 22:3
Textual Witness
The witness reads πᾶν κατανάθεμα οὐκ ἔσται ἔτι, so the form sits inside a negative future clause about what will no longer be present.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
The adjective's totalizing force makes the promise sound complete and final, not partial or provisional.
How To Communicate It
In communication, the form encourages translations that convey completeness, so the audience hears the promise as absolute removal of curse.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Neuter singular agreement does not by itself create a theological claim.
- The adjective does not change the lemma into another word or force an interpretation beyond the clause.
What Does The Label Mean?
Adjective: the word modifies a noun and can function substantivally, so it describes the scope or extent of what follows.
Nominative: the form stands in a nominative slot here, matching the clause pattern and helping mark the phrase as the subject expression.
Singular: the form is grammatically singular in this occurrence, so it presents one collective idea rather than a plural set.
Neuter: the neuter class fits the modified noun here and does not by itself add any gendered theological meaning.
What The Form Does In This Verse
κατανάθεμα
It is linked to the noun phrase πᾶν κατανάθεμα and agrees with it in form, helping express totality for the item named.
It qualifies the noun as comprehensive in scope, so the line reads as the removal of every curse or cursed thing from that realm.
It does not create a new subject, and it does not by itself decide the exact nuance beyond the broad sense of totality.
How Much The Form Matters Here
High: The adjective qualifies the curse language comprehensively, strengthening the promise that no curse remains.
Adjectival modifier of the curse noun. marks the noun phrase as comprehensive in scope. Attached to the noun phrase about curse or cursed thing. Governed by agreement with the neuter singular noun it modifies. The adjective contributes totality, while the promise is carried by the whole clause.
How much curse remains in the scene? The adjective helps express the comprehensive removal of every curse or cursed thing.
Direct: The form directly supports rendering the promise with "every" or "any" curse according to translation style.
The exact English rendering may vary, but the adjective gives comprehensive force to the noun phrase.
Neuter singular weakens the promise: The neuter singular agrees with its noun; the scope is comprehensive because of the adjective and clause.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
The witness reads πᾶν κατανάθεμα οὐκ ἔσται ἔτι, so the form sits inside a negative future clause about what will no longer be present.
The lemma πᾶς commonly carries the idea of all, every, or the whole, and here the neuter singular form can mark totality for the noun it modifies.
In this context the adjective strengthens the negated statement, presenting the absence as comprehensive rather than limited to a subset.
The phrase communicates that nothing cursed will remain there, underscoring the complete removal of curse from the scene.
This fits the passage's larger picture of restored holiness and unbroken divine rule, where the setting is no longer marked by curse.
For readers and teachers, the form supports a clear rendering such as every curse or no cursed thing, while leaving the precise translation shaped by context.
Do not derive a separate doctrine from neuter singular form alone, and do not overread it as if grammar by itself settled every nuance.