עָשָׂ֔ה (‘ā·śāh) in Isaiah 53:9: Verb - Qal - Perfect - third person masculine singular

Hebrew-verb

Verb

Verb - Qal - Perfect - third person masculine singular

Qal

Perf

Third

Masculine

Singular

Not applicable

None

The perfect supports a retrospective assessment of His conduct before the burial outcome rather than pointing to one isolated deed.

Qal perfect views the Servant's doing as a whole under negation, while masculine singular agreement follows Him.

No violence as the negated object in the concession explaining the Servant's innocent character

The burial statement that places the Servant with the wicked and a rich man despite His lack of violence and deceit

The third masculine singular Qal perfect presents the Servant as the subject whose conduct is denied by the object no violence.

The verb form itself does not mean innocence; negation and the object supply that claim, alongside the separate statement about His mouth.

High: The Servant receives a death and burial associated with wrongdoing even though the song testifies that He practiced no violence and spoke no deceit.

Qal perfect views the Servant's doing as a whole under negation, while masculine singular agreement follows Him.. The third masculine singular Qal perfect presents the Servant as the subject whose conduct is denied by the object no violence.. Attached to no violence as the negated object in the concession explaining the Servant's innocent character. Governed by the burial statement that places the Servant with the wicked and a rich man despite His lack of violence and deceit. The verb form itself does not mean innocence; negation and the object supply that claim, alongside the separate statement about His mouth.

Which elements make He had done no violence an innocence statement? The Servant is the singular subject, the perfect surveys His doing, and the negation with violence denies that conduct of Him.

Direct: He had done places the conduct before the burial description in English, while no violence carries the decisive negation.

Perfect aspect can support prior action in this context, but English had done is a discourse choice rather than a mechanical tense equation. Violence can cover harmful conduct broadly; the poetic parallel with deceit contributes to the Servant's innocence portrait.

Perfect aspect means sinless: Aspect presents the action as a whole; the words no violence and no deceit establish the innocence claim. one negated object exhausts holiness: The line testifies specifically about violence and deceit within a wider canonical account of the Servant. morphology replaces literary context: The H6213 form clarifies the He had done relation in Isaiah 53:9; the surrounding passage establishes its scope.

At Isaiah 53:9, the Isaiah 53:9 source token עָשָׂ֔ה is H6213, V-Qal-Perf-3ms. The H6213 Isaiah 53:9 BSB+ word table row therefore anchors this guide.

עָשָׂה is the lemma behind He had done here. Within Isaiah 53:9, H6213 retains this exact lexical identity.

Qal perfect views the Servant's doing as a whole under negation, while masculine singular agreement follows Him.

The Servant receives a death and burial associated with wrongdoing even though the song testifies that He practiced no violence and spoke no deceit.

The innocence statement sharpens the representative character of the Servant's suffering and prepares the guilt-offering language that follows.

Build the claim from verb, negation, and object together: He did, no, violence. None of those elements alone carries the full assertion.

Do not derive sinlessness from perfect aspect alone, and do not reduce violence to only one physical act when the clause reviews His conduct.