δικαιωθήσεται (dikaiothesetai) in Romans 3:20: Verb Third Person Singular Future Passive Indicative
δικαιωθήσεται (dikaiothesetai) in Romans 3:20
Textual Witness
The Textus Receptus reading at Romans 3:20 has δικαιωθήσεται in the clause οὐ δικαιωθήσεται πᾶσα σὰρξ.
How The Form Affects Interpretation
The form strengthens the verse's force as a general negative claim, so the reader hears not a local rule but a sweeping statement about human inability to be justified by works of law.
How To Communicate It
This verb form helps the verse communicate a clear boundary: law-works are excluded as the basis of justification, and that message is sharpened by the clause's future passive negation.
What Not To Say
- Grammatical form should serve context, not override it.
- Future passive indicative describes the clause's shape, but the surrounding words set the meaning.
- Do not turn grammatical gender or number into theological claims; keep the explanation text-driven and restrained.
What Does The Label Mean?
Verb: the form names an action or state, and here it is the clause's main verbal idea.
Future: points the action forward from the speaker's viewpoint, while the sentence controls the exact sense.
Passive: presents the subject as receiving or being affected by the action.
Indicative: presents the verbal idea as an assertion or statement in the clause.
Third person: the form speaks about someone or something rather than directly as I/we or you.
Not applicable: this verb form is not using noun case to mark its sentence role.
Singular: the verb is marked as singular, which fits a single grammatical subject in the clause.
Not applicable: this verb form does not use grammatical gender to make its point.
What The Form Does In This Verse
The verb is attached to the clause with οὐ and the subject πᾶσα σὰρξ, in the sentence ἔργων νόμου οὐ δικαιωθήσεται πᾶσα σὰρξ ἐνώπιον αὐτοῦ.
It is governed by the sentence-level negation and the subject phrase, and the verse frames it as a future passive assertion about what will not happen.
The form carries the clause's main assertion: no flesh will be justified before him from works of law.
It does not by itself specify the grounds, the agent, or the full theology of justification beyond what the surrounding clause states.
How Much The Form Matters Here
High: The future passive indicative carries the main denial that no flesh will be justified by works of law.
Main verbal assertion. states what will not happen to the subject in the clause while leaving the agent implicit. Attached to the negated clause about every flesh. Governed by the subject phrase and sentence-level negation. The passive form matters for agency, but the grounds and contrast come from the surrounding words.
What action does the verb deny? It denies that any flesh will be justified before him from works of law, while the clause supplies the grounds and setting.
Direct: The future passive form directly affects the English rendering as will not be justified or a comparable passive expression.
The passive voice leaves the agent implicit here; do not name more agency than the verse names.
Passive voice names the agent by itself: Passive voice marks the subject as receiving the action, but the context must identify the agent or leave the agent implicit. future form supplies the full doctrine of justification: The future passive gives the clause its form, but the doctrine rests on Paul's whole argument, not on tense and voice alone.
How The Interpretation Is Derived
The Textus Receptus reading at Romans 3:20 has δικαιωθήσεται in the clause οὐ δικαιωθήσεται πᾶσα σὰρξ.
The lemma δικαιόω means to justify or declare righteous, so the form keeps that legal or declarative sense in view.
The singular future passive indicative matches the clause's general statement about what will not occur to any flesh in God's presence, without making the form itself carry every doctrinal detail.
In this verse, the grammar supports Paul's claim that works of law do not provide the basis on which anyone is justified before God.
This fits Paul's larger argument in Romans that righteousness before God is not established by law observance but is received through God's saving action.
For communication, the form helps readers hear a broad, decisive denial rather than a narrow exception or a merely past event.
Do not derive from the tense or voice alone a full doctrine of justification, a named agent, or a claim that the form changes the word's lexical meaning.