ἀκούων. (akouon) in Revelation 22:8: Verb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine

Verb: this participial form still carries verbal sense while functioning like a modifier in the clause.

Present: often views the action as in progress, customary, or presently in view. Context decides the exact force.

Active: presents the subject as doing or carrying the action.

Participle: carries a verbal idea while also functioning like an adjective or clause element. Context decides its role.

Nominative: the participle is in the nominative case and here aligns with the subject frame around John.

Singular: the form is singular here, matching the single speaker who is being described in the verse.

Masculine: the form is grammatically masculine, which only marks agreement in this setting and does not by itself make a theological claim.

It stands with ὁ βλέπων ταῦτα and helps identify John as the one who is seeing and hearing.

The participle is governed by the nominative subject description of ἐγὼ Ἰωάννης and the article ὁ, so it contributes to the self-identification phrase.

It functions descriptively, adding a second present action to the portrait of John as the witness who both sees and hears these things.

It does not introduce a separate event or a new subject, and it does not by itself determine the content of what is heard.

High: The participle helps present John as the witness who both sees and hears the revelation.

Present active participle, nominative singular masculine. adds hearing to John's witness description alongside seeing. Attached to John's self-identification with seeing and hearing. Governed by the nominative subject frame, I John. The participle contributes to the witness description rather than introducing a separate main event.

How is John identified in the verse? He is identified as the one seeing and hearing these things.

Supporting: The participle supports a description such as hearing these things alongside seeing them.

Present participle should not be forced into a claim about uninterrupted hearing. The participle is tied to John's witness identity, not a new subject. The authority of the testimony is supplied by the whole witness statement, not the participle alone.

Present participle proves continuous action: The participle describes John in this testimony frame; it should not be turned into a timing claim. participle adds a separate event: The participle works inside John's self-identification with what he saw and heard.

The witness reads ἀκούων in the sequence 'βλέπων ταῦτα καὶ ἀκούων', so the form belongs to John's self-description in the verse.

The lemma ἀκούω means to hear, listen, or attend, and the participle keeps that hearing sense while modifying the subject.

Its participial form presents hearing as an ongoing characteristic alongside seeing, so the verse pictures John as an active recipient of revelation.

In context, John identifies himself as the one who is seeing these things and hearing them, which supports his role as a witness to what is being shown.

This fits the broader Revelation pattern of receiving and reporting revealed words and visions without making the grammar say more than the sentence says.

For readers, the form underscores attentive reception: John is not only observing but also listening to what is being disclosed.

Do not infer from the participle alone that the hearing is repeated, continuous in a technical sense, or that it changes the lemma into another meaning.