ἀδικῶν (adikon) in Revelation 22:11: Verb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine

Noun: this form is a participle used substantively, so it names the person characterized by the action rather than functioning as a finite verb.

Present: often views the action as in progress, customary, or presently in view. Context decides the exact force.

Active: presents the subject as doing or carrying the action.

Participle: carries a verbal idea while also functioning like an adjective or clause element. Context decides its role.

Nominative: this form stands in a nominative slot and most naturally identifies the subject-like participant in the clause.

Singular: this form refers to one grammatical participant at a time, fitting the verse's distributive pattern of individual descriptions.

Masculine: this is the grammatical class of the form in context, and it does not by itself make a theological claim about gender.

It is attached to the article ὁ in ὁ ἀδικῶν and is paired with the imperative ἀδικησάτω.

The participle is framed by the article and coordinated with the other nominative labels in the verse, so it functions as a descriptive subject-like designation in a series.

It identifies the one who is acting unjustly, and the following imperative addresses that person in a pointed, rhetorical way.

It is not a standalone tense statement about ongoing action, and it does not by itself decide motive, extent, or legal category.

High: The participle identifies the wrongdoer in the solemn sequence of Revelation 22:11.

Present active participle, nominative singular masculine. labels the person acting unjustly before the matching imperative follows. Attached to the article forming the wrongdoer. Governed by the parallel command sequence in Revelation 22:11. The participle names the person; the imperative and parallel sequence supply the rhetorical force.

Who is named at the start of the warning sequence? The one acting unjustly is named before the matching command.

Direct: The participial phrase directly supports the wrongdoer or the one doing wrong.

Present participle identifies the person and should not be treated as a timing theory. Masculine agreement is grammatical and does not restrict the warning to males. The verse's force comes from the full sequence, not from this form alone.

Participle alone approves wrongdoing: The participle names the wrongdoer; it does not approve the action. present participle proves permanent identity: The form characterizes the person in the warning sequence and should stay tied to the verse.

The witness reads ὁ ἀδικῶν ἀδικησάτω ἔτι in Revelation 22:11 within a balanced set of four clauses.

The lemma ἀδικέω means to act unjustly, do wrong, or harm, so the form names the one marked by such conduct.

The article plus participle makes a descriptive label, and the surrounding imperatives show that the verse is speaking in a direct, forceful manner.

The clause sets the unjust person before the reader as the one being addressed, with the imperative continuing the verse's solemn and finalizing tone.

Within the verse's parallel lines, the form belongs to a pattern that contrasts moral types without requiring the grammar to supply the whole theology.

In translation or teaching, this form can be rendered as 'the one who does wrong' or 'the unjust person' to preserve the participial sense.

Do not derive from the participle alone a claim about permanent identity, unlimited duration, or gendered theology.