ἔσται. (estai) in Revelation 22:12: Verb Third Person Singular Future Middle Deponent Indicative

Verb: the form states being or existence, here in a future indicative form that presents an action or state as expected ahead of time.

Future: points the action forward from the speaker's viewpoint, while the sentence controls the exact sense.

Middle Deponent: uses a middle or passive form traditionally read with active sense. The lexeme and sentence still govern the meaning.

Indicative: presents the verbal idea as an assertion or statement in the clause.

Third person: the form speaks about someone or something rather than directly as I/we or you.

Not applicable: this verb form is not using noun case to mark its sentence role.

Singular: the form is grammatically singular and agrees with a singular subject or a singular clause reference in this sentence.

Not applicable: this verb form does not use grammatical gender to make its point.

τὸ ἔργον αὐτοῦ

The verb is governed by the clause sense of what a person's work will be like, and it completes the comparison introduced by ὡς.

It states the future reality of the work in the comparison, helping the verse say that each person's work will prove or stand in a certain way.

It does not by itself identify the work as a different entity, and it does not supply the content of the reward beyond the clause context.

Moderate: The future verb supports the comparison about each person's work, while the wider verse carries the reward and judgment claim.

Future middle deponent indicative. states what the work will be like in the comparison that grounds recompense. Attached to the phrase about each person's work. Governed by the comparative clause introduced by hos. The verb links the comparison; it does not define reward apart from the whole verse.

What will be assessed in the comparison? Each person's work is in view, with the verse saying recompense corresponds to what that work will be like.

Direct: The future form directly supports a rendering such as will be in the comparison.

Middle deponent morphology in eimi should not be read as a special agency claim. Future form supports the forward-looking statement, but it does not settle the full timing of judgment by itself. The comparison and reward language govern the interpretive force of the clause.

Future tense alone proves an eschatological timetable: The future form supports the statement, but the passage supplies the larger timing and judgment frame. middle deponent voice proves agency: The deponent label for eimi should not create an agency claim.

The witness reads ἔσται in Revelation 22:12, and the immediate phrase is ὡς τὸ ἔργον αὐτοῦ ἔσται.

The lemma εἰμί is the common verb of being or existence, and here it contributes a simple predicative link rather than a specialized lexical meaning.

The future singular form fits the clause about each person's work and frames it as a coming reality, but the surrounding words supply the sense of comparison and assessment.

In this verse the grammar supports the idea that Christ will repay each one according to what his work will be like, without forcing the verb to carry the whole interpretation alone.

Within Revelation, future forms often support announced certainty, and here the form serves the wider promise of decisive coming and just recompense.

For readers, the form communicates expectation and certainty about the outcome, helping the sentence sound like a settled promise rather than a vague possibility.

Do not derive a hidden doctrinal category from the tense or voice, and do not treat grammatical singularity or the verb form as overriding the clause meaning.