παραπτώματα, (paraptomata) in Colossians 2:13: Noun Accusative Plural Neuter

Noun: this word names an act or condition of trespass, so it functions as a substantive in the sentence.

Accusative: the form commonly marks the direct object or the thing affected by the verb, and here it fits the forgiven items named in the clause.

Plural: the form refers to multiple trespasses, presenting the offenses as a collective set rather than a single act.

Neuter: the noun belongs to the neuter grammatical class, which is a formal language feature and not a theological gender claim.

πάντα τὰ παραπτώματα

The accusative plural is governed by χαρισάμενος, which presents the forgiven trespasses as the direct object of the gracious act.

It names the totality of offenses that are being forgiven, and it completes the thought of God's gracious dealing with the readers' sins.

It does not by itself name the subject of the sentence, and it does not require a special abstract meaning beyond the context of forgiven trespasses.

High: The accusative plural noun names all the trespasses as the object of gracious forgiveness.

Accusative plural neuter noun. names the offenses forgiven in the clause. Attached to all the trespasses. Governed by the forgiving participial clause in Colossians 2:13. The plural object shows the offenses in view; the gracious action supplies the saving emphasis.

What has been forgiven? The plural noun names the trespasses as the offenses forgiven.

Direct: The form directly supports trespasses or offenses as the object in English.

The plural form names a set of offenses but does not count or classify every sin by itself. Neuter grammatical gender does not add a theological gender claim.

Plural noun defines every category of sin alone: The noun names the forgiven offenses; the passage governs the full soteriological claim. grammar replaces gracious action: The object matters because it is governed by the forgiving action in the clause.

The witness reads παραπτώματα in the phrase πάντα τὰ παραπτώματα, within Colossians 2:13, where the context speaks of being made alive and forgiven.

The lemma παράπτωμα refers to a trespass, misdeed, or false step, so the form here points to concrete offenses rather than a different lexical idea.

As an accusative plural noun, the form is best read as the thing forgiven by the participle χαρισάμενος, while the surrounding sentence explains the saving action.

The verse presents God as giving life together with Christ and, in that same saving action, forgiving all the readers' trespasses.

This fits the broader biblical pattern that links divine mercy, forgiveness, and new life, without forcing the grammar to carry the theology by itself.

For teaching, the form clarifies that the verse speaks of many sins being dealt with together, not a vague moral failure in general.

Do not derive a claim that the accusative form creates the doctrine of forgiveness, changes the lemma, or settles every question of syntax beyond this context.