Moses
The Crisis of the Lord’s Presence After the Golden Calf
After Israel’s covenant rebellion, Moses intercedes for the one thing Israel cannot live without: the Lord’s own presence, by which His people are known, guided, distinguished, and given rest.
Reading a chapter
What this page is: Each chapter page shows the big idea, the argument flow, key original-language terms, doctrine connections, and passage units, all in one place.
How to use it: Start with the Overview tab to get the chapter's main point. Then move to Passages to study individual units, or Language to trace key terms.
Going deeper: The Doctrines and Motifs tabs show how this chapter connects to the broader biblical story.
After Israel’s covenant rebellion, Moses intercedes for the one thing Israel cannot live without: the Lord’s own presence, by which His people are known, guided, distinguished, and given rest.
Exodus 33 argues that the promised land without the Lord’s presence would not be true covenant blessing. Israel’s sin makes the Lord’s nearness dangerous, yet Moses pleads on the basis of divine favor, covenant identity, and the need for God’s presence. The Lord grants the request, showing mercy without reducing His holiness. Moses’ request to see the Lord’s glory reveals that the highest desire of covenant mediation is not merely rescue, land, or success, but deeper knowledge of the Lord Himself.
Israel, the covenant people redeemed from Egypt, now standing under the consequences of the golden calf rebellion and facing the terrifying possibility of moving forward without the Lord’s own presence in their midst.
Mount Sinai and the Israelite camp after the golden calf incident of Exodus 32. Moses has broken the tablets, interceded for the people, and the Lord has struck the people because of their sin.
After Israel’s covenant rebellion, Moses intercedes for the one thing Israel cannot live without: the Lord’s own presence, by which His people are known, guided, distinguished, and given rest.
Moses
Israel, the covenant people redeemed from Egypt, now standing under the consequences of the golden calf rebellion and facing the terrifying possibility of moving forward without the Lord’s own presence in their midst.
Mount Sinai and the Israelite camp after the golden calf incident of Exodus 32. Moses has broken the tablets, interceded for the people, and the Lord has struck the people because of their sin.
- Israel must now face the aftermath of covenant rebellion. The immediate question is not merely whether they will continue toward the promised land, but whether the Lord Himself will go with them.
Ancient peoples often associated divine favor with military success, land possession, and visible religious symbols. Exodus 33 confronts a deeper issue: possessing the land without the Lord’s presence would not be true blessing. Israel’s identity depends on the Lord going with them.
Exodus 33 stands between the golden calf rebellion in Exodus 32 and covenant renewal in Exodus 34. It develops the crisis created by Israel’s sin and centers on Moses’ intercession for the Lord’s continuing presence.
The chapter moves from the Lord’s command for Israel to leave Sinai and go toward the promised land, to the frightening announcement that He will not go up in their midst lest He destroy them, to Israel’s mourning and removal of ornaments, to Moses’ practice of meeting with the Lord at the tent of meeting outside the camp, to Moses’ intercession for the Lord’s presence, to the Lord’s promise that His Presence will go with Moses and give rest, and finally to Moses’ request to see the Lord’s glory and the Lord’s gracious but limited self-revelation.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
Exodus 33 clarifies the gospel by showing that the greatest need of sinners is not merely pardon from consequences, but restored presence with God. Israel could have land, angelic help, and military victory, yet Moses knows that without the Lord Himself, they have nothing. Sin has endangered God’s nearness, but mediation secures mercy. This points forward to Christ, the greater Mediator, who does not merely ask God to go with His people but brings God’s presence to them and brings them safely to God through His blood.
Israel is commanded to continue toward the land, but the Lord’s own presence in their midst is withheld because of their sin.
Moses meets with the Lord outside the camp, and the people worship from a distance.
Moses pleads for the Lord’s ways, favor, and presence, insisting that Israel’s distinction depends on the Lord going with them.
Moses asks to see the Lord’s glory, and the Lord promises a merciful revelation of His goodness and name while shielding Moses from direct sight of His face.
- 1-3: The Lord commands Israel to continue toward the promised land but warns that His presence in their midst would destroy them because they are stiff-necked.
- 4-6: Israel responds to the dreadful word by mourning and removing their ornaments.
- 7-11: Moses meets with the Lord at the tent of meeting outside the camp, where the pillar of cloud descends and the Lord speaks with Moses.
- 12-13: Moses asks to know the Lord’s ways and reminds Him that Israel is His people.
- The Lord promises His Presence and rest.
- 15-17: Moses insists that without the Lord’s presence, Israel should not go forward, because His presence distinguishes them from all peoples.
- 18-23: Moses asks to see the Lord’s glory, and the Lord promises to reveal His goodness and name while protecting Moses from the full sight of His face.
Pastoral Entry
עָלָה is the Hebrew verb for ascent — for going up, climbing, rising, mounting, and being lifted. Its range is vast: it describes a man climbing a mountain, a people going up to worship, a king marching out to war, smoke rising from an altar, a nation coming up out of Egypt, the sun breaking over the horizon, a thought coming up in the heart, and a burnt offering being presented before God. In 894 occurrences it moves through nearly every terrain of Israelite life, which means that when the Old Testament thinks about movement, orientation, or direction toward God, this verb is almost always present.
What makes עָלָה theologically rich is that spatial ascent in the Old Testament is rarely only spatial. To go up is to draw near to God. The sanctuary sits on the mountain. Jerusalem is always approached from below. The temple mount is elevated. To ascend is to move toward the Holy — not as an abstract spiritual exercise, but as an embodied, directional act of worship. Israel went up to the three great festivals. The Psalms of Ascent (מַעֲלוֹת, Psalms 120–134) gave the pilgrim people words for the journey. Ascent was not merely geography; it was theology made physical.
At the same time, the verb carries genuine cultic weight through its use in sacrificial contexts. When עָלָה describes the burnt offering (עֹלָה), it points to what goes up completely — the whole animal consumed, ascending in smoke, rising toward God. The same verbal root underlies both the pilgrimage and the offering. Both involve movement upward, both involve cost, and both involve coming before the living God.
Pastorally, עָלָה is a word that refuses to let Israel — or the church — treat nearness to God as a passive, horizontal, or costless thing. There is a direction to worship, a journey to approach, an orientation to holiness. The preacher who sits with this verb long enough will find it challenging cheap familiarity with God while also welcoming the weary traveler who is still on the road, still ascending, still on their way to the mountain.
Sense go up, ascend
Definition To go up or ascend.
References Exodus 33:1, 3, 5, 15
Lexicon go up, ascend
Why it matters The Lord commands Israel to move toward the promised land, raising the question of whether His presence will go with them.
Pastoral Entry
מַלְאָךְ (malak) means messenger — human or divine. The word covers royal messengers, prophetic envoys, human heralds, and the heavenly beings called angels. The root idea is agency: the malak is sent by someone greater, speaks on their authority, and carries their message.
The word is used for human messengers throughout the historical books (e.g., David sending malak to Abigail, 1 Sam 25:14) and for heavenly beings in the patriarchal and prophetic literature. In a number of cases, malak YHWH (the Angel of the Lord) behaves in ways that make the figure difficult to distinguish from YHWH himself: he speaks in the first person as God (Gen 16:10, 'I will greatly multiply your offspring'), he is addressed as YHWH (Judg 6:22, Gideon says 'I have seen the angel of YHWH face to face'), and he accepts worship that would be inappropriate for a mere creature.
This has led many interpreters — from the early church fathers through Calvin and beyond — to read the Angel of the Lord as a pre-incarnate appearance of the Son of God (a Christophany). The NT is cautious about affirming this directly, but the behavior pattern of the malak YHWH — speaking as God, bearing the divine Name, mediating the divine presence — does prepare the congregation for the incarnation: the God who appeared to Hagar, Abraham, and Gideon as an angel-messenger now appears in permanent human form in Jesus Christ.
Sense angel, messenger
Definition A messenger or angel sent by God.
References Exodus 33:2
Lexicon angel, messenger
Why it matters The Lord promises to send an angel before Israel, but Moses pleads for the Lord’s own Presence.
Sense to drive out, expel
Definition To drive out or expel.
References Exodus 33:2
Lexicon to drive out, expel
Why it matters The Lord still promises victory over the peoples of the land despite the presence crisis.
Sense milk and honey
Definition A phrase describing abundance and provision in the promised land.
References Exodus 33:3
Lexicon milk and honey
Why it matters The land remains desirable, but Moses refuses land without the Lord’s presence.
Sense stiff-necked, stubborn
Definition Hard-necked, stubborn, resistant to submission.
References Exodus 33:3, 5
Lexicon stiff-necked, stubborn
Why it matters Israel’s stubborn rebellion makes the Lord’s holy presence dangerous for them.
Sense to consume, finish, destroy
Definition To bring to an end, consume, or destroy.
References Exodus 33:3, 5
Lexicon to consume, finish, destroy
Why it matters The Lord’s holy presence would consume stiff-necked Israel apart from mercy.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense evil/distressing word
Definition A grievous or distressing word.
References Exodus 33:4
Lexicon evil/distressing word
Why it matters Israel mourns when they hear that the Lord will not go in their midst.
Sense to mourn
Definition To mourn, grieve, or lament.
References Exodus 33:4
Lexicon to mourn
Why it matters The people mourn over the threatened loss of the Lord’s presence.
Sense ornament, adornment
Definition Jewelry or adornment.
References Exodus 33:4-6
Lexicon ornament, adornment
Why it matters Israel removes ornaments as a sign of mourning and humiliation after idolatry.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense tent
Definition A tent or temporary dwelling.
References Exodus 33:7-11
Lexicon tent
Why it matters Moses pitches a temporary tent outside the camp as the place of meeting with the Lord.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense tent of meeting
Definition The appointed tent where the LORD meets with Moses.
References Exodus 33:7
Lexicon tent of meeting
Why it matters This temporary meeting tent outside the camp shows mediated access after Israel’s sin.
Sense outside the camp
Definition Outside the Israelite encampment.
References Exodus 33:7
Lexicon outside the camp
Why it matters The meeting place outside the camp reflects the distance created by Israel’s covenant sin.
Sense seek the LORD
Definition To seek, inquire of, or pursue the LORD.
References Exodus 33:7
Lexicon seek the LORD
Why it matters Those seeking the Lord go outside the camp to the tent of meeting.
Sense pillar of cloud
Definition The visible cloud associated with the LORD’s presence.
References Exodus 33:9-10
Lexicon pillar of cloud
Why it matters The cloud descends at the tent when the Lord speaks with Moses.
Pastoral Entry
שָׁחָה (šāḥāh) is the primary Hebrew verb for worship, and its physical character is essential to its meaning: it means to bow down, to prostrate oneself, to bring the body to the ground in an act of reverence, honor, and submission. The posture of šāḥāh is not merely metaphorical — it is the physical enactment of the theological conviction that the one before whom you bow down is greater, holier, and more worthy than you.
In the OT, šāḥāh is used for both worship directed to God (the legitimate object) and idolatrous prostration before false gods (the forbidden use), and the vocabulary is identical — showing that the issue is not the act of prostration itself but the object of the prostration. The most common OT collocation is wayyiqqōd wayyišttaḥû — 'and he bowed and prostrated himself' — appearing as a combined formula of respectful submission before superiors, which in the divine context becomes the definitive act of worship.
The first commandment's prohibition of other gods and the second commandment's prohibition of images are both enforced precisely by the šāḥāh prohibition: 'you shall not bow down (lōʾ tišttaḥweh) to them or serve them' (Exod 20:5). The NT's proskyneō (G4352) is the direct Greek equivalent — to bow, to prostrate, to worship — and it carries the same range: prostration before Jesus as an act of recognition of his divine identity (Matt 2:2,11; 28:9,17), and the eschatological universal prostration of every knee before the name of Jesus (Phil 2:10).
Sense to bow down, worship
Definition To bow in worship or reverence.
References Exodus 33:10
Lexicon to bow down, worship
Why it matters The people worship when they see the cloud descend at the tent of meeting.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Pastoral Entry
פָּנִים is the Hebrew word rendered 'face' in most translations, but its reach across the Old Testament is far wider than anatomy. Indexed in the local Hebrew artifact at about 2,127 occurrences, it carries the weight of presence, encounter, orientation, and relational standing. A face turns toward someone or away. It bestows favour or withdraws it. It is the surface of the self most exposed to another, and in Hebrew thought the face is therefore the index of the whole person's attention, disposition, and attitude.
In its most basic use, פָּנִים names the human face as the visible front of the body — the part that meets the world. But from that literal root, the word grows in every direction. To see someone's face is to come into their presence. To seek someone's face is to seek their attention, help, or favour. To fall on one's face is to prostrate oneself in worship, awe, or terror. To hide one's face is to refuse encounter or to express grief and shame. These are not metaphors layered onto a neutral anatomical term; they are the full semantic life of the word as Scripture uses it.
The most theologically charged use of פָּנִים is its application to God. The phrase 'the face of the Lord' (פְּנֵי יְהוָה) is one of the Old Testament's central theological idioms. To seek the face of God is to seek his presence, attention, and blessing — not to attempt to see his physical form. When the Lord's face shines upon his people, it is an image of his grace turned toward them in favour and peace. When his face is hidden, it signals withdrawal of protection, relationship, and mercy. The Aaronic blessing of Numbers 6:24–26, which calls for the Lord's face to shine upon and be gracious to Israel, places the entire wellbeing of God's people inside the word פָּנִים. The face of God is where his covenant mercy lives.
The word also functions prepositionally with extraordinary frequency. לִפְנֵי (before, in the presence of) and מִפְּנֵי (from before, because of, away from the face of) together account for hundreds of occurrences. In this prepositional use, פָּנִים names the sphere of another's presence — spatial and relational at once. To stand before someone is not merely to occupy their vicinity but to enter the relational field they generate.
Pastorally, פָּנִים opens the question of encounter. The whole drama of Scripture — exile and return, hiddenness and revelation, wrath and mercy — is narrated in part through the idiom of God's face. Israel's deepest need was not merely rescue from enemies or provision for hunger; it was to see the face of God turned toward them again. That longing finds its answer in the blessing of Numbers 6, in the priestly psalms, and finally — thematically and christologically — in the face of God made known in the face of Jesus Christ.
Sense face to face
Definition Directly, personally, with unusual intimacy.
References Exodus 33:11
Lexicon face to face
Why it matters The phrase describes the directness of Moses’ communication with the Lord, while later verses preserve the boundary that Moses cannot see God’s face and live.
Sense friend, companion
Definition A friend, companion, or neighbor.
References Exodus 33:11
Lexicon friend, companion
Why it matters The Lord speaks with Moses as one speaks to a friend, emphasizing Moses’ unique intimacy.
Pastoral Entry
שָׁרַת (sharat) is the Hebrew verb for attending upon someone in direct, personal service — the specific word for the ministry of priests and Levites before YHWH, and by extension for every act of dedicated service in the presence of a superior. Unlike עָבַד (avad, H5647), which covers all kinds of labor and service, sharat denotes the close, personal attendance of one standing in the immediate presence of the one served. The Levitical sharat before YHWH is the OT's model for what it means to be in the service of the holy God.
Deuteronomy 10:8 gives sharat its defining covenantal context: 'At that time YHWH set apart the tribe of Levi to carry the ark of the covenant of YHWH, to stand (amad) before YHWH to minister (lesharet) to him, and to bless in his name, to this day.' The Levitical sharat is defined by three acts: bearing the ark (proximity to the presence), standing before YHWH (the amad-posture of service), and blessing in his name (mediating the divine word to the people). The sharat is not mere function — it is the vocation of closeness to YHWH.
First Kings 19:21 gives sharat its most famous personal-attendant use: Elisha, when Elijah found him, 'arose and went after Elijah and ministered (vaysharet) to him.' The sharat of Elisha to Elijah is the apprenticeship of the prophet — close personal attendance that preceded the double-portion inheritance of the spirit. The model is consistent across the OT: Joshua shatarat (ministered) to Moses (Exod 24:13), Elisha ministered to Elijah, and both received the prophetic inheritance from the one they served. The sharat-relationship is the relationship in which the servant receives the master's spirit.
Ezekiel 44:15-16 gives sharat its eschatological priestly use: 'But the Levitical priests, the sons of Zadok, who kept the charge of my sanctuary when the people of Israel went astray from me, shall come near to me to minister (lesharet) to me. And they shall stand before me to offer me the fat and the blood, declares the Lord YHWH.' The sons of Zadok who remained faithful when others went astray are the ones who receive the privilege of sharat in the restored sanctuary. The sharat is reserved for those who maintained faithfulness — faithfulness to the covenant is the qualification for the intimate sharat.
Isaiah 61:6 gives sharat its universalized application: 'but you shall be called the priests of YHWH; people shall speak of you as the ministers (meshartei) of our God.' The people of the new covenant are called priests and meshartei of God — the sharat-vocation that was Levi's alone in the Mosaic economy is extended to the whole people in the Isaianic new covenant.
For the preacher, שָׁרַת (sharat) defines Christian vocation: not abstract religious feeling but close, attending service in the presence of the living God.
Sense servant, minister, aide
Definition One who serves or ministers.
References Exodus 33:11
Lexicon servant, minister, aide
Why it matters Joshua is identified as Moses’ young aide who remains at the tent.
Pastoral Entry
חֵן is found, not earned. The idiom 'find favor in the eyes of' captures this exactly: Noah does not manufacture his standing before YHWH; he finds it. Gen 6:8 — 'Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord' — immediately precedes the announcement of the flood: the finding of חֵן is what distinguishes Noah from the generation that perished, and it is YHWH's disposition toward him, not his own achievement.
Exod 33:12-17 is the most theologically developed OT חֵן text: Moses asks YHWH to 'know me and show me your ways, that I may find favor in your eyes.' YHWH's response — 'My presence will go with you, and I will give you rest' — shows that חֵן is the ground of divine presence, not the reward of adequate performance. This is the logic the NT inherits and escalates: Eph 2:8-9 ('by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works') is the full flower of what חֵן's 'find favor' idiom was already beginning to describe.
Sense favor, grace
Definition Favor or gracious acceptance.
References Exodus 33:12-13, 16-17
Lexicon favor, grace
Why it matters Moses repeatedly appeals to finding favor in the Lord’s sight.
Sense known by name
Definition Personal knowledge and recognition.
References Exodus 33:12, 17
Lexicon known by name
Why it matters The Lord’s personal knowledge of Moses grounds Moses’ intercessory appeal.
Pastoral Entry
דֶּרֶךְ begins with ground underfoot — a road worn into the earth by repeated passage, a path shaped by the feet of those who have walked it before. But the Old Testament rarely lets the word stay merely physical. Almost from the beginning, דֶּרֶךְ describes something more searching: the course a human life is taking, the direction in which a person, a nation, or even God himself is moving. It is one of the most frequently used nouns in the Hebrew Bible for good reason — few categories cut closer to what Scripture wants to say about human existence before God.
As a word for human life and conduct, דֶּרֶךְ carries moral weight without being merely moralistic. When wisdom literature speaks of the way of the righteous or the way of the wicked, it is not simply cataloguing behaviors. It is describing the direction in which a life is oriented, the trajectory on which a person's habits, affections, choices, and loyalties have set them. A way, once established, goes somewhere. That is the pastoral gravity of the word: every human life is on a path headed toward a destination. The question Torah and Wisdom press is always which way.
DEREK also carries a divine dimension that must not be missed. Scripture speaks of the ways of God — not merely his commands but the character and pattern of his own action, the coherence and faithfulness with which he moves through history, the manner in which he redeems, disciplines, provides, and leads. God's ways are consistently declared to be higher, holier, and more reliable than human ways. To learn the ways of God is not to master a technique but to submit to a Lord whose paths are always just and always good.
Pastorally, דֶּרֶךְ holds together what we are prone to separate: outward conduct and inward direction, single decisions and life patterns, individual discipleship and communal formation. The person who walks in the way of wisdom is not merely doing correct things — their whole life is moving in a direction shaped by the fear of the Lord. And the Lord himself, as Hosea 14:9 declares, walks in ways that are right, along which the righteous walk but in which the rebellious stumble. The word therefore is not neutral. Every way reveals something about who is being trusted, what is being loved, and where life is ultimately being headed.
Sense ways, paths, conduct
Definition Ways, paths, patterns of action, or conduct.
References Exodus 33:13
Lexicon ways, paths, conduct
Why it matters Moses asks to know the Lord’s ways so that he may know Him and continue in favor.
Pastoral Entry
יָדַע (yādaʿ) is the Hebrew verb for knowing, but it encompasses far more than cognitive awareness. Hebrew yādaʿ is experiential, relational, and covenantal knowledge — the knowledge that comes from encounter, intimacy, and ongoing relationship, not merely from information received. The OT uses yādaʿ for the most intimate human relationship (Gen 4:1: 'Adam knew his wife Eve'), for the prophetic encounter with God ('before I formed you in the womb I knew you,' Jer 1:5), and for the covenantal recognition formula that drives the prophetic books.
The most theologically significant yādaʿ in the OT is the divine-human knowing: God knowing his people and his people knowing God. The formula 'you shall know (wĕyādaʿtem) that I am the Lord' recurs throughout Ezekiel, and the divine self-disclosure is pointed toward recognition. YHWH acts in history so that both Israel and the nations will yādaʿ his identity.
This recognition formula gives the prophetic movement a clear horizon: YHWH acts so Israel and the nations will recognize him. The prophetic promise of the new covenant is formulated in yādaʿ terms: Jeremiah 31:34 — 'they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest' — defines the new covenant by the universality and completeness of the yādaʿ that will characterize it.
This is why John 17:3 defines eternal life as knowing the Father and the Son: the covenant goal of yādaʿ, now available in Christ.
Sense to know
Definition To know personally, relationally, or experientially.
References Exodus 33:13
Lexicon to know
Why it matters Moses desires deeper knowledge of the Lord, not merely practical guidance.
Pastoral Entry
עַם names the gathered, bound-together people — not merely a crowd of individuals occupying the same space, but a community constituted by shared identity, shared story, and shared belonging. The BDB root-gloss points toward kinship — the word carries the weight of being knit together. When the Old Testament calls Israel עַם, it does not simply mean a demographic or a population count. It names a relational reality: people who belong to one another because they belong to the same God.
The word moves across a wide range of uses. It describes national Israel as a covenant people — gathered, shaped, addressed, and held by YHWH. It is the congregation assembled before God at Sinai, at the Tent of Meeting, before the ark. It describes troops and armies — those who move and act together under command. It names foreign peoples and nations — Gentile עַמִּים stand alongside and in contrast to Israel. And in its most concentrated theological sense, עַם is the people of God: the elect community whom God chose not because of their size or virtue, but because of His own love and His oath to the fathers.
Where עַם appears in the Old Testament it is rarely neutral. It is almost always relational and almost always directional. The people are going somewhere — following, rebelling, being gathered, being scattered, being redeemed. They are led by a shepherd-king or abandoned under bad shepherds. They stand before God or wander from him. The word therefore carries both the grace of belonging and the weight of accountability. To be עַם is not a passive status. It is a living position within a covenant relationship that demands response, fidelity, and return when the people stray.
Pastorally, עַם resists two opposite errors. Against individualism, it insists that God has always worked through a people — not merely a collection of personal spiritual journeys, but a bound community with a shared name, shared inheritance, and shared vocation. Against tribalism, the word across the canon ultimately opens outward: the nations are not excluded forever; the vision of Scripture moves toward a gathered people from every tribe and language and tongue.
Sense people, nation
Definition A people or community.
References Exodus 33:13, 16
Lexicon people, nation
Why it matters Moses insists that Israel remains the Lord’s people despite their sin.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Pastoral Entry
פָּנִים is the Hebrew word rendered 'face' in most translations, but its reach across the Old Testament is far wider than anatomy. Indexed in the local Hebrew artifact at about 2,127 occurrences, it carries the weight of presence, encounter, orientation, and relational standing. A face turns toward someone or away. It bestows favour or withdraws it. It is the surface of the self most exposed to another, and in Hebrew thought the face is therefore the index of the whole person's attention, disposition, and attitude.
In its most basic use, פָּנִים names the human face as the visible front of the body — the part that meets the world. But from that literal root, the word grows in every direction. To see someone's face is to come into their presence. To seek someone's face is to seek their attention, help, or favour. To fall on one's face is to prostrate oneself in worship, awe, or terror. To hide one's face is to refuse encounter or to express grief and shame. These are not metaphors layered onto a neutral anatomical term; they are the full semantic life of the word as Scripture uses it.
The most theologically charged use of פָּנִים is its application to God. The phrase 'the face of the Lord' (פְּנֵי יְהוָה) is one of the Old Testament's central theological idioms. To seek the face of God is to seek his presence, attention, and blessing — not to attempt to see his physical form. When the Lord's face shines upon his people, it is an image of his grace turned toward them in favour and peace. When his face is hidden, it signals withdrawal of protection, relationship, and mercy. The Aaronic blessing of Numbers 6:24–26, which calls for the Lord's face to shine upon and be gracious to Israel, places the entire wellbeing of God's people inside the word פָּנִים. The face of God is where his covenant mercy lives.
The word also functions prepositionally with extraordinary frequency. לִפְנֵי (before, in the presence of) and מִפְּנֵי (from before, because of, away from the face of) together account for hundreds of occurrences. In this prepositional use, פָּנִים names the sphere of another's presence — spatial and relational at once. To stand before someone is not merely to occupy their vicinity but to enter the relational field they generate.
Pastorally, פָּנִים opens the question of encounter. The whole drama of Scripture — exile and return, hiddenness and revelation, wrath and mercy — is narrated in part through the idiom of God's face. Israel's deepest need was not merely rescue from enemies or provision for hunger; it was to see the face of God turned toward them again. That longing finds its answer in the blessing of Numbers 6, in the priestly psalms, and finally — thematically and christologically — in the face of God made known in the face of Jesus Christ.
Sense face, presence
Definition Face or personal presence.
References Exodus 33:14-15
Lexicon face, presence
Why it matters The Lord’s own Presence is the blessing Moses seeks above land or success.
Pastoral Entry
נוּחַ (nuach) is the Hebrew word for rest — the settling down, the ceasing from turmoil, the arrival at the place of quietness where YHWH's provision makes striving unnecessary. It is one of Scripture's most theologically loaded verbs: its range covers the ark resting on Ararat after the flood (Gen 8:4), the Spirit resting on the elders (Num 11:25), YHWH giving his people rest from their enemies (Deut 12:10), and the eschatological rest that Hebrews 4 calls the Sabbath-rest remaining for the people of God.
Genesis 8:4 gives nuach its deliverance form: 'And the ark rested (vatanach) in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the mountains of Ararat.' The ark — the vessel of salvation through judgment — rests at last. The nuach of the ark is the sign that the judgment-waters are spent and the new creation can begin. Noah (Noach, from the same root: 'this one will bring us relief') names the man whose name is the promise of what his work will deliver. The ark resting on Ararat is a miniature eschatology: the saved emerge from the vessel into a world that has been through judgment and is ready for a new beginning.
Numbers 11:25-26 gives nuach its Spirit-resting form: 'And YHWH came down in the cloud and spoke to him and took some of the Spirit that was on him and put it on the seventy elders. And when the Spirit rested (vatanach) on them, they prophesied, but they did not continue doing so.' The Spirit of YHWH rests on the elders: the nuach of the Spirit is the moment of empowerment for leadership. Eldad and Medad receive the Spirit in the camp (v. 26) — the Spirit's nuach is not confined to the Tent of Meeting. Joshua objects (v. 28); Moses responds (v. 29): 'Would that all YHWH's people were prophets and that YHWH would put his Spirit on them!' This longing of Moses is fulfilled at Pentecost (Acts 2:16-18).
Deuteronomy 12:10 gives nuach its land-gift form: 'But when you go over the Jordan and live in the land that YHWH your God is giving you to inherit, and when he gives you rest (heniach, Hiphil) from all your enemies around you, so that you live in safety, then to the place that YHWH your God will choose to make his name dwell there...' The Hiphil of nuach — YHWH causes them to rest — is the gift of rest from enemies as the precondition for centralized worship. The land is the rest-space; YHWH's gift of rest enables the people to gather at the one place YHWH chooses. The temple will be built in the rest-season.
Psalm 23:2 gives nuach its pastoral form: 'He makes me lie down in green pastures; he leads me beside still waters (al mei menuchot — literally, beside waters of rest).' The mei menuchot are the nuach-waters: the waters that do not roar with threat but rest in quietness. The shepherd-psalm's nuach is the gift of restful provision — the sheep is not fighting for survival at the waterhole but led to waters where rest is possible.
Isaiah 11:10 gives nuach its eschatological form: 'In that day the root of Jesse, who shall stand as a signal for the peoples — of him shall the nations inquire, and his resting place (menuchah) shall be glorious.' The Messiah's menuchah — his resting place, his dwelling — will be glorious: the place where the Spirit of YHWH rests (v. 2: 'the Spirit of YHWH shall rest upon him') becomes the place of eschatological nuach for the nations.
For the preacher, נוּחַ (nuach) gives the congregation the grammar of divine rest: the rest YHWH gives is not laziness but the arrival at the place of secure provision where striving against threat is no longer necessary.
Sense to give rest, settle
Definition To rest, settle, or give rest.
References Exodus 33:14
Lexicon to give rest, settle
Why it matters The Lord’s Presence gives rest, showing that rest comes from God with His people.
Sense going with us
Definition To go with or accompany.
References Exodus 33:16
Lexicon going with us
Why it matters Moses refuses to move forward unless the Lord accompanies them.
Sense to be distinct, set apart, distinguished
Definition To be treated as distinct or set apart.
References Exodus 33:16
Lexicon to be distinct, set apart, distinguished
Why it matters The Lord’s presence distinguishes Israel from all other peoples.
Pastoral Entry
כָּבוֹד is the Hebrew word most closely translated as glory, but the English word does not carry the full freight. The root meaning is weight, heaviness, something that presses down because of its sheer substance. In its human dimension, kabod describes the honor, reputation, and splendor that belongs to a person of standing: the wealth of a king, the dignity of a noble family, the visible manifestation of power and worth. But it is in its divine dimension that the word becomes one of the most theologically loaded in the entire Hebrew Bible.
The kabod of the Lord is not merely a quality He possesses. It is His active, visible, weighty self-disclosure. When God's glory fills the tabernacle, the priests cannot stand to minister. When His glory passes before Moses on the mountain, Moses must be shielded in the rock. When His glory fills the temple at Solomon's dedication, the whole house is consumed with cloud and fire. This is not metaphor. It is what happens when the weight of God's presence enters a space where human beings are present. Kabod describes the radiant, manifest, concrete reality of the living God making Himself known, and what that encounter actually costs those who stand near it.
The theological arc of kabod runs through departure and return. In 1 Samuel 4, when the ark is captured, the dying wife of Phinehas names her newborn Ichabod: the glory has departed. The name is a wound, a recognition that Israel without God's presence is not Israel at all. Ezekiel then carries this logic to its most devastating expression: in chapters 8 through 11, the kabod of the Lord rises from the cherubim, moves to the threshold of the temple, pauses at the east gate, and finally departs the city. The departure is measured and sorrowful. God does not leave in anger without warning. He leaves stage by stage, grieved by what He has seen in the sanctuary. And then, in chapters 43 and 44, the glory returns, streaming from the east, filling the restored temple, the voice of God like the sound of many waters. The return is the whole hope of the prophet.
For the New Testament, the glory of God finds its fullest and most unexpected expression in a manger and on a cross. John 1:14 uses the Greek word δόξα, the LXX translation of kabod: the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen His glory. The tent-language is deliberate. He tabernacled among us, and the kabod that filled the desert sanctuary now filled a human body. At the transfiguration, the disciples see it briefly on a mountain. At the cross, what looks like loss is the glorification of the Son. The word that began as weight carries through the entire canon to land in the person of Jesus Christ.
Sense glory, weight, honor
Definition Weighty splendor, honor, or manifestation of God’s presence.
References Exodus 33:18, 22
Lexicon glory, weight, honor
Why it matters Moses asks to see the Lord’s glory after receiving the promise of His presence.
Sense goodness
Definition Goodness, beauty, bounty, or moral excellence.
References Exodus 33:19
Lexicon goodness
Why it matters The Lord answers Moses’ request to see glory by making His goodness pass before him.
Pastoral Entry
קָרָא is the great calling word of the Hebrew Bible — the verb that sets God in motion toward people and people in motion toward God. It carries a range of meanings that can seem almost too wide at first: to call out, to name, to summon, to proclaim, to invite, to cry aloud, to read. But behind this breadth lies a single animating reality: the power and intimacy of a voice that addresses by name, that establishes relationship by speaking, and that makes a claim on whoever is addressed.
When God calls, something is always at stake. He calls out the light and the darkness to receive their names. He calls Abraham out of Ur and gives him a new identity. He calls Moses from a burning bush and defines the rest of his life in that exchange. He calls Israel his son in the exodus and declares in the same breath that that calling came before all the people's straying. When the prophets use קָרָא for God's proclaiming, what is proclaimed always carries the weight of God's own authority and character — his mercy, his warning, his name.
When human beings call to God, קָרָא becomes the language of prayer and dependence. The Psalms return again and again to this word: calling on the name of the Lord is the posture of the righteous, the lifeline of the afflicted, the praise of the delivered. To call on God is not merely to petition him. It is to acknowledge his name, to declare who he is, and to place oneself in his presence as one who has no other resource.
The word also carries a distinct public, proclamatory sense. Prophets proclaim; heralds cry out; the reading of the law in the assembly is קָרָא. In these uses the word marks the moment when God's word enters public space and demands a response. Scripture read aloud, commandments declared, warnings issued, grace announced — all of this belongs to the range of קָרָא.
The naming dimension of קָרָא is not a peripheral use but a theological statement: to name something is to call it into its identity. God's naming of things and people is an act of sovereign love, establishing what something is and who someone belongs to. When God says 'I have called you by name; you are mine' (Isaiah 43:1), all three senses of the word converge at once — the personal address, the naming, and the act of claiming as his own.
Sense to call, proclaim
Definition To call out, proclaim, or announce.
References Exodus 33:19
Lexicon to call, proclaim
Why it matters The Lord will proclaim His name before Moses, revealing His character by His own declaration.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense name of the LORD
Definition The revealed name and character of the covenant LORD.
References Exodus 33:19
Lexicon name of the LORD
Why it matters The Lord reveals His glory by proclaiming His own name.
Pastoral Entry
חָנַן is the verbal root of one of the most theologically significant Hebrew noun clusters: ḥēn (grace/favor, H2580) and ḥesed (lovingkindness, H2617). The verb means to show gracious condescension toward someone of lower status — to stoop, to bend toward, to give undeserved favor. BDB notes the root idea of bending or stooping in kindness to an inferior, which is the posture the word describes: a superior freely choosing to favor someone who has no claim on that favor.
The theological weight of ḥānan is concentrated in the divine character texts. When the Lord passes before Moses in Exodus 34:6 and declares his name, the first two attributes after 'the Lord, the Lord' are raḥûm (compassionate) and ḥannûn (gracious, the adjectival form of ḥānan). This Exodus 34 formula becomes the most-quoted divine self-description in the OT — it echoes in Psalms 86, 103, 111, 116, 145; in Joel 2:13; in Jonah 4:2; in Nehemiah 9:17,31.
When the OT community needed to anchor its prayer in something more stable than its own merit, it reached for the ḥannûn formula: 'you are a gracious God.' The verb also appears in the structure of Hebrew prayer: 'Be gracious to me, O Lord' (ḥonnênî, a Qal imperative) is the characteristic petition of the Psalms of lament. Psalm 51:1 — the great penitential Psalm — opens with this verb: 'Have mercy on me, O God, according to your steadfast love; according to your abundant mercies, blot out my transgressions.'
The prayer is grounded not in the petitioner's worthiness but in the character of the ḥannûn God.
Sense to show mercy, be gracious
Definition To show favor, mercy, or grace.
References Exodus 33:19
Lexicon to show mercy, be gracious
Why it matters The Lord declares His sovereign freedom in showing mercy.
Pastoral Entry
רָחַם names the kind of compassion that is not detached sympathy or cool benevolence, but a gut-level, visceral tenderness toward one who is vulnerable, suffering, or helpless. The Hebrew root shares its consonants with the word for womb (רֶחֶם), and while etymology cannot be pressed as meaning, that resonance is not accidental — it surfaces throughout the way this verb is actually used. The compassion named by רָחַם is generative, intimate, and bound by something deeper than obligation. It is the response of one who sees need and is moved in the deepest interior of themselves to act for the other's restoration and good.
The verb appears prominently in the Piel and Pual stems, which intensifies its force. Israel's God is the subject far more often than any human figure, and when He is the subject the stakes are total — exile or return, judgment or restoration, abandonment or renewed covenant. When the Lord says He will have compassion (Piel) or will not have compassion (Piel negated), whole trajectories of Israel's history hang on the answer. This is not casual emotional language. It is covenant language at the highest register.
At the same time, רָחַם also names something real about the character of God that cannot be collapsed into legal transaction or formal obligation. The parent who sees a child is the most natural human analogy Scripture itself reaches for (Psalm 103:13), and even that image is deliberately surpassed — a mother's womb-compassion for her nursing child may fail, but the Lord's will not (Isaiah 49:15). The verb does theological work that חֶסֶד (covenant loyalty) and חֵן (grace, favor) do not fully cover. Where חֶסֶד speaks of faithful love bound by covenant commitment, רָחַם speaks of tender mercy moved by the sight of need. Both belong to who God is; they are not interchangeable.
For preaching and pastoral use: this is not a comfortable word. It appears in passages of refused mercy (Hosea 1:6; Jeremiah 13:14), withdrawn compassion under judgment, and extravagant renewed tenderness after exile. The God who רָחַם is not indifferent to sin or obligation — He is moved by the condition of His people in ways that exceed what any legal framework can contain. His compassion is the ground on which restoration becomes possible at all.
Sense to show compassion
Definition To show compassion, pity, or tender mercy.
References Exodus 33:19
Lexicon to show compassion
Why it matters The Lord’s glory includes sovereign compassion.
Pastoral Entry
פָּנִים is the Hebrew word rendered 'face' in most translations, but its reach across the Old Testament is far wider than anatomy. Indexed in the local Hebrew artifact at about 2,127 occurrences, it carries the weight of presence, encounter, orientation, and relational standing. A face turns toward someone or away. It bestows favour or withdraws it. It is the surface of the self most exposed to another, and in Hebrew thought the face is therefore the index of the whole person's attention, disposition, and attitude.
In its most basic use, פָּנִים names the human face as the visible front of the body — the part that meets the world. But from that literal root, the word grows in every direction. To see someone's face is to come into their presence. To seek someone's face is to seek their attention, help, or favour. To fall on one's face is to prostrate oneself in worship, awe, or terror. To hide one's face is to refuse encounter or to express grief and shame. These are not metaphors layered onto a neutral anatomical term; they are the full semantic life of the word as Scripture uses it.
The most theologically charged use of פָּנִים is its application to God. The phrase 'the face of the Lord' (פְּנֵי יְהוָה) is one of the Old Testament's central theological idioms. To seek the face of God is to seek his presence, attention, and blessing — not to attempt to see his physical form. When the Lord's face shines upon his people, it is an image of his grace turned toward them in favour and peace. When his face is hidden, it signals withdrawal of protection, relationship, and mercy. The Aaronic blessing of Numbers 6:24–26, which calls for the Lord's face to shine upon and be gracious to Israel, places the entire wellbeing of God's people inside the word פָּנִים. The face of God is where his covenant mercy lives.
The word also functions prepositionally with extraordinary frequency. לִפְנֵי (before, in the presence of) and מִפְּנֵי (from before, because of, away from the face of) together account for hundreds of occurrences. In this prepositional use, פָּנִים names the sphere of another's presence — spatial and relational at once. To stand before someone is not merely to occupy their vicinity but to enter the relational field they generate.
Pastorally, פָּנִים opens the question of encounter. The whole drama of Scripture — exile and return, hiddenness and revelation, wrath and mercy — is narrated in part through the idiom of God's face. Israel's deepest need was not merely rescue from enemies or provision for hunger; it was to see the face of God turned toward them again. That longing finds its answer in the blessing of Numbers 6, in the priestly psalms, and finally — thematically and christologically — in the face of God made known in the face of Jesus Christ.
Sense face
Definition Face or direct personal presence.
References Exodus 33:20, 23
Lexicon face
Why it matters Moses cannot see the Lord’s face and live, preserving the holiness and transcendence of God.
Pastoral Entry
Ḥāyāh is the Old Testament's primary verb for life itself: to live, to be alive, to remain alive, to revive from the edge of death, and causatively to keep someone alive or to give life. It covers the whole spectrum from biological existence to the restored vitality that comes when God intervenes. In Genesis, God breathes life into the dust and man becomes a living being; in Ezekiel, God commands the dry bones and they live.
The word does not separate physical from spiritual life in the way later theological categories often do. To live before God in the Old Testament is to be in right relationship with him: the psalmist cries that God has kept his soul alive, and Deuteronomy promises that obedience to God's word is the path of life and length of days. Ḥāyāh also functions as a cry of hope: "let the king live," "may your soul live."
It is used of God preserving Noah through the flood, of Israel surviving in the wilderness, of Rahab and her household being spared. Life in these texts is always gift, always contingent, always held by God. The verb thus shapes the Old Testament's vision of salvation as fundamentally a matter of living or dying, of God holding life open against the encroachment of death.
Sense to live
Definition To live or remain alive.
References Exodus 33:20
Lexicon to live
Why it matters No one can see the Lord’s face and live, showing the danger of unshielded divine glory.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Pastoral Entry
צוּר is the Hebrew word for rock — the geological kind — but in the Psalms and the Pentateuch it becomes one of the most concentrated divine titles in the OT. It describes a large rock formation, a cliff, a crag: the kind of geological feature that provides shelter, shade, protection from wind, and a vantage point from which enemies cannot approach easily. In the wilderness of Judah, such rocks are the difference between life and death for shepherds and soldiers.
The Psalms apply this image to God with a consistency that makes צוּר a theological category: the Lord is my rock (Ps 18:2, 18:31, 18:46, 19:14, 28:1, 62:2, 62:6-7, 89:26, 92:15, 94:22, 95:1, 144:1). It is not only that God is like a rock; in the Psalms' theological vocabulary, the Lord is the Rock — the one who provides the shelter, the stability, and the height that a physical rock provides in the wilderness.
The Pentateuch's uses of צוּר are striking in their theological concentration. Moses hides in the cleft of the rock at the theophany of Exodus 33:22 — the physical rock and the divine Rock are in the same scene. Deuteronomy 32 (the Song of Moses) uses צוּר as the dominant divine title: 'the Rock, his work is perfect' (32:4), 'you were unmindful of the Rock who bore you' (32:18), 'their rock is not as our Rock, even our enemies themselves being judges' (32:31).
The song establishes the theological logic: Israel's Rock is incomparable to the rocks of other nations; what the Gentile gods cannot provide, the Lord provides. The NT application of צוּר is twofold: Paul identifies the Rock that followed Israel in the wilderness as Christ (1 Cor 10:4), and Jesus builds his church on a rock (πέτρα, Matt 16:18 — likely an echo of the Psalm צוּר titles).
Sense rock
Definition A rock or rocky place.
References Exodus 33:21-22
Lexicon rock
Why it matters The Lord places Moses on a rock near Him as He passes by.
Sense cleft, crevice
Definition A cleft, crevice, or hollow place in rock.
References Exodus 33:22
Lexicon cleft, crevice
Why it matters The Lord hides Moses in the cleft of the rock while His glory passes by.
Sense to cover, shield
Definition To cover, screen, or protect.
References Exodus 33:22
Lexicon to cover, shield
Why it matters The Lord covers Moses with His hand to protect him from the full force of divine glory.
Sense hand, palm
Definition Palm or hand.
References Exodus 33:22-23
Lexicon hand, palm
Why it matters The Lord’s hand shields Moses during the passing of His glory.
Sense back, after-part
Definition Back or what follows behind.
References Exodus 33:23
Lexicon back, after-part
Why it matters Moses is allowed to see the Lord’s back, not His face, indicating real but limited revelation.
Lexicon data: MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML (CC0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (CC BY 4.0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon (CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible Data (CC BY 4.0) · Full details
| v.1 | H3212יָלַךְQal · Imperative · ImperativeH5927עָלָהQal · Imperative · ImperativeH5927עָלָהHiphil · Perfect · IndicativeH7650שָׁבַעNiphal · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.10 | H5975עָמַדQal · Participle |
| v.11 | H1696דָבַרPiel · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH4185מוּשׁQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.12 | H7200רָאָהQal · Imperative · ImperativeH559אָמַרQal · ParticipleH5927עָלָהHiphil · Imperative · ImperativeH7971שָׁלַחQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH559אָמַרQal · Perfect · IndicativeH4672מָצָאQal · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.13 | H4672מָצָאQal · Perfect · IndicativeH4672מָצָאQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortative |
| v.14 | H3212יָלַךְQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.15 | H1980הָלַךְQal · Participle |
| v.16 | H3045יָדַעNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH4672מָצָאQal · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.17 | H1696דָבַרPiel · Perfect · IndicativeH6213עָשָׂהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortativeH4672מָצָאQal · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.19 | H5674עָבַרHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortativeH2603חָנַןQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortativeH7355רָחַםPiel · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortative |
| v.20 | H3201יָכֹלQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.23 | H7200רָאָהNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.3 | H2100זוּבQal · ParticipleH5927עָלָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortative |
| v.4 | H7896שִׁיתQal · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.5 | H559אָמַרQal · Imperative · ImperativeH5927עָלָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortativeH3381יָרַדHiphil · Imperative · ImperativeH6213עָשָׂהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortative |
| v.7 | H3947לָקַחQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH7368רָחַקHiphil · Infinitive absoluteH1245בָּקַשׁPiel · ParticipleH3318יָצָאQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.8 | H6965קוּםQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.9 | H3381יָרַדQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
Aspect in Hebrew is grammatical form, not tense. Perfect = completed action; Imperfect = incomplete/ongoing. Stem modifies action type (Qal=simple, Niphal=passive, Piel=intensive).
Morphology: OSHB WLC (Open Scriptures, CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible TEHMC (Tyndale House, CC BY 4.0)
Theological Argument
Exodus 33 argues that the promised land without the Lord’s presence would not be true covenant blessing. Israel’s sin makes the Lord’s nearness dangerous, yet Moses pleads on the basis of divine favor, covenant identity, and the need for God’s presence. The Lord grants the request, showing mercy without reducing His holiness. Moses’ request to see the Lord’s glory reveals that the highest desire of covenant mediation is not merely rescue, land, or success, but deeper knowledge of the Lord Himself.
From the threat of moving forward without the LORD’s presence, to mourning and distance, to mediated meeting outside the camp, to intercession for presence, to the promise of rest, to the request for glory and the LORD’s guarded self-revelation.
- 1.Sin makes the LORD’s holy presence dangerous for a stiff-necked people.
- 2.Moses’ mediated access becomes essential after covenant rebellion.
- 3.The mediator pleads to know the LORD’s ways and preserve Israel as the LORD’s people.
- 4.The LORD’s Presence is the source of rest and the distinguishing mark of His people.
- 5.The LORD grants Moses’ request on the basis of favor and personal knowledge.
- 6.The LORD reveals His glory through goodness, name, mercy, and compassion, while preserving the boundary of divine holiness.
Theological Focus
- The presence of the Lord
- Stiff-necked people
- Covenant aftermath
- Mourning
- Removal of ornaments
- Tent of meeting
- Moses’ mediation
- Face-to-face speech
- Knowing the Lord’s ways
- Favor before God
- Rest
- Israel’s distinct identity
- The glory of the Lord
- The goodness of the Lord
- The name of the Lord
- Mercy and compassion
- The hiddenness of God’s face
- Presence is greater than possession
- Sin threatens nearness
- Mourning before restoration
- Mediation outside the camp
- Unique intimacy of Moses
- Knowing God’s ways
- Presence gives rest
- The people of God are marked by God with them
- Glory revealed as goodness and name
- Mercy remains sovereign
- God reveals and conceals
- Divine Presence
- Holiness
- Mediation
- Intercession
- Covenant Identity
- Divine Glory
- Divine Goodness
- Sovereign Mercy
- Christological Fulfillment
Theological Themes
The promised land without the Lord’s presence would not be true blessing.
The Lord’s holiness means His presence in the midst of stiff-necked Israel could destroy them.
The people’s removal of ornaments visibly expresses grief and humiliation after covenant sin.
Moses meets with the Lord outside the camp, showing the distance created by Israel’s sin.
The Lord speaks with Moses face to face, as one speaks with a friend.
Moses asks not merely for information but for deeper knowledge of the Lord’s character and dealings.
The Lord promises that His Presence will go with Moses and give rest.
Moses says the Lord’s presence distinguishes Israel from all other peoples.
The Lord responds to Moses’ request for glory by promising the passing of His goodness and the proclamation of His name.
The Lord declares that He will have mercy and compassion according to His own sovereign will.
Moses receives real revelation of God, yet cannot see the Lord’s face and live.
Covenant Significance
Exodus 33 addresses the covenant crisis caused by the golden calf. The land promise remains, but the presence promise is threatened. Moses intercedes for the Lord’s presence because covenant identity depends on the Lord going with His people. The chapter prepares for covenant renewal by showing that Israel’s future rests not on their obedience, but on the Lord’s mercy, Moses’ mediation, and the preservation of divine presence.
- Covenant land remains promised - The Lord still commands Israel to go toward the land sworn to the patriarchs.
- Covenant presence is endangered - The Lord says He will not go in their midst because of their stiff-necked rebellion.
- Covenant shame is visible - Israel mourns and removes ornaments after hearing the Lord’s word.
- Covenant mediation continues - Moses meets with the Lord and intercedes for the people.
- Covenant identity depends on presence - Israel is distinct only if the Lord goes with them.
- Covenant renewal is prepared - The promise of presence and revelation of glory prepare for the renewed covenant in Exodus 34.
- Exodus 3:12 - The Lord promised Moses that His presence would be with him when he was sent to deliver Israel.
- Exodus 25:8 - The Lord commanded the sanctuary so He might dwell among Israel.
- Exodus 29:45-46 - The Lord declared that He brought Israel out of Egypt so He might dwell among them.
- Exodus 32:30-35 - Moses interceded after the calf, but guilt and consequences remained.
- Exodus 34:5-9 - The Lord will proclaim His name and reveal His merciful and just character in response to the request of Exodus 33.
Canonical Connections
The Lord’s presence with His people is central from Exodus through the whole biblical storyline.
Moses’ intercession after Israel’s sin anticipates the need for a greater mediator.
Moses’ request to see glory is later developed in biblical revelation, climaxing in Christ.
The Lord’s statement about mercy and compassion is later cited in Paul’s discussion of divine mercy.
The Lord’s promise of rest through His presence develops into broader biblical rest theology.
The boundary around seeing God’s face appears throughout Scripture and is resolved through God’s self-revelation in Christ.
Cross References
Since then, there has not arisen a prophet in Israel like Moses, whom Yahweh knew face to face,
For what great nation is there that has a god so near to them as Yahweh our God is whenever we call on him?
Know therefore that Yahweh your God doesn’t give you this good land to possess for your righteousness, for you are a stiff-necked people. Remember, and don’t forget, how you provoked Yahweh your God to wrath in the wilderness. From the day...
Yahweh went before them by day in a pillar of cloud, to lead them on their way, and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light, that they might go by day and by night: the pillar of cloud by day, and the pillar of fire by night,...
Yahweh said to Moses, “Behold, I come to you in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with you, and may also believe you forever.” Moses told the words of the people to Yahweh.
“Behold, I send an angel before you, to keep you by the way, and to bring you into the place which I have prepared. Pay attention to him, and listen to his voice. Don’t provoke him, for he will not pardon your disobedience, for my name is...
He said, “Certainly I will be with you. This will be the token to you, that I have sent you: when you have brought the people out of Egypt, you shall serve God on this mountain.” Moses said to God, “Behold, when I come to the children of...
I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land to a good and large land, to a land flowing with milk and honey; to the place of the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Amorite, the...
Now Yahweh said to Abram, “Leave your country, and your relatives, and your father’s house, and go to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation. I will bless you and make your name great. You will be a blessing. I...
He said to Abram, “Know for sure that your offspring will live as foreigners in a land that is not theirs, and will serve them. They will afflict them four hundred years. I will also judge that nation, whom they will serve. Afterward they...
I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God to you and to your offspring after you. I will give to you, and to your offspring after you,...
I will visit on her the days of the Baals, to which she burned incense, when she decked herself with her earrings and her jewels, and went after her lovers, and forgot me,” says Yahweh. “Therefore behold, I will allure her, and bring her...
In the year that king Uzziah died, I saw the Lord sitting on a throne, high and lifted up; and his train filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each one had six wings. With two he covered his face. With two he covered his feet....
Yahweh said to Moses, “Gather to me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom you know to be the elders of the people and officers over them; and bring them to the Tent of Meeting, that they may stand there with you. I will come down and...
He said, “Now hear my words. If there is a prophet among you, I, Yahweh, will make myself known to him in a vision. I will speak with him in a dream. My servant Moses is not so. He is faithful in all my house. With him, I will speak mouth...
Moses said to Yahweh, “Then the Egyptians will hear it; for you brought up this people in your might from among them. They will tell it to the inhabitants of this land. They have heard that you Yahweh are among this people; for you Yahweh...
Canon-Wide Connections
Cross-reference data: OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0)
Exodus 33 clarifies the gospel by showing that the greatest need of sinners is not merely pardon from consequences, but restored presence with God. Israel could have land, angelic help, and military victory, yet Moses knows that without the Lord Himself, they have nothing. Sin has endangered God’s nearness, but mediation secures mercy. This points forward to Christ, the greater Mediator, who does not merely ask God to go with His people but brings God’s presence to them and brings them safely to God through His blood.
- Sin threatens communion - The golden calf creates a crisis in which the Lord’s presence in Israel’s midst is threatened.
- External blessing is not enough - Land and victory without the Lord would be empty.
- Mediation secures presence - Moses intercedes so that the Lord’s presence will continue with Israel.
- Presence gives rest - The Lord’s Presence, not mere circumstances, gives rest.
- God reveals glory by mercy - The Lord reveals His goodness, name, mercy, and compassion.
- Christ fulfills presence and glory - In Christ, God dwells among His people, reveals His glory, and grants access to Himself.
- Do not define salvation as escape from trouble without communion with God.
- Do not treat God’s presence as automatic after sin without mediation and mercy.
- Do not preach success, land, or mission as substitutes for God Himself.
- Do not flatten Moses’ mediation into mere leadership technique.
- Do not ignore the holiness boundary when speaking of seeing God’s glory.
- Do not miss that Christ fulfills the longing for God with us.
Primary Emphasis
Exodus 33 contributes to the biblical theology fulfilled in Christ by revealing the necessity of God’s presence, the need for mediation after sin, and the limited nature of Moses’ access to divine glory. Moses mediates for Israel so that the Lord’s presence may remain with the people, but Christ is the greater Mediator in whom God’s presence comes fully among His people. In Christ, the Word becomes flesh and dwells among us, and the glory of God is revealed in the face of Jesus Christ.
Chapter Contribution
Exodus 33 argues that the promised land without the Lord’s presence would not be true covenant blessing. Israel’s sin makes the Lord’s nearness dangerous, yet Moses pleads on the basis of divine favor, covenant identity, and the need for God’s presence. The Lord grants the request, showing mercy without reducing His holiness. Moses’ request to see the Lord’s glory reveals that the highest desire of covenant mediation is not merely rescue, land, or success, but deeper knowledge of the Lord Himself.
Moses’ partial vision anticipates Christ, in whom divine glory is revealed fully and savingly.
Moses’ mediated access outside the camp anticipates Christ, who bears reproach outside the camp and brings his people near.
The presence crisis points forward to Christ, in whom God dwells with his people and through whom sinners are brought near safely.
The face-to-face language expresses Moses’ extraordinary covenant intimacy with the Lord.
Israel is distinguished from all other peoples by the Lord’s presence, not merely land, law, ancestry, or victory.
The land sworn to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob remains in view despite Israel’s sin.
The Lord’s glory is revealed through his goodness, name, mercy, compassion, and holy transcendence.
The cloud at the tent entrance shows the Lord still meeting with Moses during the presence crisis.
The Lord declares that he will have mercy and compassion on whom he will have mercy and compassion.
The Lord’s holiness is dangerous to a stiff-necked people and may consume them in judgment.
The Lord’s refusal to go in their midst is both judgment and mercy, since his holy nearness would consume them.
Moses’ unique access becomes the means by which Israel’s relationship with the Lord continues in crisis.
Moses pleads on behalf of Israel for the Lord’s continued presence after covenant rupture.
Israel mourns and removes ornaments in response to the distressing word.
The Lord speaks with Moses, continuing to reveal himself and his will despite Israel’s sin.
The Lord truly reveals himself to Moses while also withholding full sight of his face.
The tent outside the camp visibly displays the distance produced by Israel’s idolatry.
The repeated diagnosis of Israel as stiff-necked explains the danger of divine presence after idolatry.
The people worship from their tent entrances when they see the cloud, acknowledging the Lord’s holy presence from a distance.
The central issue of the chapter is whether the Lord’s Presence will go with Israel.
The Lord’s holy presence would endanger stiff-necked Israel apart from mercy and mediation.
Moses mediates between the Lord and Israel, pleading for continued presence.
Moses appeals to favor, knowledge, covenant identity, and the need for God’s presence.
Israel is distinguished from all other peoples by the Lord’s presence with them.
Moses asks to see the Lord’s glory, and the Lord promises a guarded revelation.
The Lord answers the request for glory by promising to make His goodness pass before Moses.
The Lord declares He will have mercy and compassion according to His own will.
The themes of presence, mediation, rest, and glory are fulfilled in Christ.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
- Exodus 33 clarifies the gospel by showing that the greatest need of sinners is not merely pardon from consequences, but restored presence with God. Israel could have land, angelic help, and military victory, yet Moses knows that without the Lord Himself, they have nothing. Sin has endangered God’s nearness, but mediation secures mercy. This points forward to Christ, the greater Mediator, who does not merely ask God to go with His people but brings God’s presence to them and brings them safely to God through His blood.
The Lord’s presence is the essential covenant blessing, yet His holiness means sinners can only continue with Him through mercy, mediation, and reverent dependence.
God’s people must not be satisfied with gifts without God, mission without presence, guidance without communion, or success without glory. They must seek the Lord Himself through the Mediator He provides.
Dependence, humility, repentance, reverence, desire for God, hunger for His glory, confidence in mediation, and refusal of presence-less success.
- Pray, 'Lord, do not let me move forward without Your presence.'
- Examine where ministry or life has become outcome-driven rather than presence-driven.
- Mourn sin as a threat to communion with God.
- Ask the Lord to teach you His ways so that you may know Him.
- Measure identity by the Lord’s presence, not by comparison with others.
- Seek God’s glory through His revealed goodness, name, mercy, and compassion.
- Rest in Christ, through whom God’s presence comes to His people.
- The chapter warns that external blessing without the Lord’s presence is not true blessing, that sin threatens communion with God, that God’s holiness must not be presumed upon, and that His presence is never a common possession to be controlled by His people.
- Thinking the promised land alone would have been enough. - Moses refuses to go forward unless the Lord’s Presence goes with them.
- Treating the Lord’s refusal to go in their midst as petty anger. - The Lord’s holiness would consume stiff-necked Israel if He went among them without mediation and mercy.
- Confusing the temporary tent of meeting with the completed tabernacle. - The tabernacle has not yet been built. This tent functions as a temporary meeting place outside the camp.
- Assuming 'face to face' means Moses saw God’s full essence. - The chapter itself says Moses cannot see the Lord’s face and live · 'face to face' describes directness and intimacy of communication.
- Reducing Moses’ request to curiosity. - Moses seeks deeper knowledge of the Lord’s glory after a severe covenant crisis.
- Separating God’s goodness from His sovereignty. - The Lord reveals goodness while declaring sovereign mercy and compassion.
- Treating divine concealment as lack of grace. - The Lord hides Moses in the cleft of the rock to protect him while revealing as much as Moses can bear.
- Would I be content with success, provision, and progress if the Lord’s presence were absent?
- Do I mourn sin mainly because of its consequences, or because it grieves communion with God?
- Where has sin created distance that must be faced humbly before the Lord?
- Do I ask God only for direction, or also to know His ways and character?
- Am I willing to say, 'Do not send us up from here unless Your Presence goes with us'?
- What truly distinguishes my life, family, church, or ministry from the world?
- Do I desire God’s glory more than God’s gifts?
- Am I willing to receive God’s self-revelation on His terms rather than demanding control?
- Teach that God Himself is the blessing.
- Lead people to mourn sin as relational rupture.
- Model intercession that seeks more than survival.
- Refuse presence-less pragmatism.
- Teach leaders to seek God’s ways.
- Define church identity by God’s presence.
- Preach glory through goodness and mercy.
The Lord still promises the land, but His presence in Israel’s midst is threatened.
Israel moves from idolatrous gold to stripped-down grief.
The meeting place outside the camp reflects the distance caused by sin.
The people watch Moses enter the tent and worship when the cloud descends.
Moses appeals to the favor he has with God in order to plead for the people.
The Lord’s Presence is the source of rest for Moses and Israel.
After receiving the promise of presence, Moses asks for deeper revelation of the Lord’s glory.
The Lord reveals His goodness and name while shielding Moses from the full sight of His face.
C.F. Keil & F. Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (1861–91) — public domain
The Biblical World
Chapter At A Glance
The chapter moves from the Lord’s command for Israel to leave Sinai and go toward the promised land, to the frightening announcement that He will not go up in their midst lest He destroy them, to Israel’s mourning and removal of ornaments, to Moses’ practice of meeting with the Lord at the tent of meeting outside the camp, to Moses’ intercession for the Lord’s presence, to the Lord’s promise that His Presence will go with Moses and give rest, and finally to Moses’ request to see the Lord’s glory and the Lord’s gracious but limited self-revelation.
Exodus 33 addresses the covenant crisis caused by the golden calf. The land promise remains, but the presence promise is threatened. Moses intercedes for the Lord’s presence because covenant identity depends on the Lord going with His people. The chapter prepares for covenant renewal by showing that Israel’s future rests not on their obedience, but on the Lord’s mercy, Moses’ mediation, and the preservation of divine presence.
Exodus 33 clarifies the gospel by showing that the greatest need of sinners is not merely pardon from consequences, but restored presence with God. Israel could have land, angelic help, and military victory, yet Moses knows that without the Lord Himself, they have nothing. Sin has endangered God’s nearness, but mediation secures mercy. This points forward to Christ, the greater Mediator, who does not merely ask God to go with His people but brings God’s presence to them and brings them safely to God through His blood.
Dependence, humility, repentance, reverence, desire for God, hunger for His glory, confidence in mediation, and refusal of presence-less success.
Focus Points
- The presence of the Lord
- Stiff-necked people
- Covenant aftermath
- Mourning
- Removal of ornaments
- Tent of meeting
- Moses’ mediation
- Face-to-face speech
- Knowing the Lord’s ways
- Favor before God
- Rest
- Israel’s distinct identity
- The glory of the Lord
- The goodness of the Lord
- The name of the Lord
- Mercy and compassion
- The hiddenness of God’s face
- Presence is greater than possession
- Sin threatens nearness
- Mourning before restoration
- Mediation outside the camp
- Unique intimacy of Moses
- Knowing God’s ways
- Presence gives rest
- The people of God are marked by God with them
- Glory revealed as goodness and name
- Mercy remains sovereign
- God reveals and conceals
- Divine Presence
- Holiness
- Mediation
- Intercession
- Covenant Identity
- Divine Glory
- Divine Goodness
- Sovereign Mercy
- Christological Fulfillment
Cross References
Passages
Chapter opening: Exodus 33:1-6
Moses’ negotiations with the people, for the purpose of bringing them to sorrow and repentance, commenced with the announcement of what Jehovah had said. The words of Jehovah in Exo 33:1-3, which are only a still further expansion of the assurance contained in Exo 32:34, commence in a similar manner to the covenant promise in Exo 23:20, Exo 23:23; but there is this great difference, that whereas the name, i.
e. , the presence of Jehovah Himself, was to have gone before the Israelites in the angel promised to the people as a leader in Exo 23:20, now, though Jehovah would still send an angel before Moses and Israel, He Himself would not go up to Canaan (a land flowing, etc. , see at Exo 3:8) in the midst of Israel, lest He should destroy the people by the way, because they were stiff-necked (אכלך for אכלך, see Ges.
§27, 3, Anm . 2).
Exo 33:4 The people were so overwhelmed with sorrow by this evil word, that they all put off their ornaments, and showed by this outward sign the trouble of their heart,
Exo 33:5 That this good beginning of repentance might lead to a true and permanent change of heart, Jehovah repeated His threat in a most emphatic manner: “ Thou art a stiff-necked people; if I go a moment in the midst of thee, I destroy thee: ” i.e., if I were to go up in the midst of thee for only a single moment, I should be compelled to destroy thee because of thine obduracy. He then issued this command: “ Throw thine ornament away from thee, and I shall know (by that) what to do to thee .”
Exo 33:6 And the people obeyed this commandment, renouncing all that pleased the eye. “ The children of Israel spoiled themselves (see at Exo 12:36) of their ornament from Mount Horeb onwards. ” Thus they entered formally into a penitential condition. The expression, “from Mount Horeb onwards,” can hardly be paraphrased as it is by Seb. Schmidt, viz. , “going from Mount Horeb into the camp,” but in all probability expresses this idea, that from that time forward, i.
e. , after the occurrence of this event at Horeb, they laid aside the ornaments which they had hitherto worn, and assumed the outward appearance of perpetual penitence.
Exo 33:7-11 Moses then took a tent, and pitched it outside the camp, at some distance off, and called it “ tent of meeting . ” The “tent” is neither the sanctuary of the tabernacle described in Ex 25. , which was not made till after the perfect restoration of the covenant (Ex 35.) , nor another sanctuary that had come down from their forefathers and was used before the tabernacle was built, as Clericus, J.
D. Michaelis, Rosenmüller, and others suppose; but a tent belonging to Moses, which was made into a temporary sanctuary by the fact that the pillar of cloud came down upon it, and Jehovah talked with Moses there, and which was called by the same name as the tabernacle, viz. , מועד אחל (see at Exo 27:21), because Jehovah revealed Himself there, and every one who sought Him had to go to this tent outside the camp.
There were two reasons for this: in the first place, Moses desired thereby to lead the people to a fuller recognition of their separation from their God, that their penitence might be deepened in consequence; and in the second place, he wished to provide such means of intercourse with Jehovah as would not only awaken in the minds of the people a longing for the renewal of the covenant, but render the restoration of the covenant possible. And this end was answered.
Not only did every one who sought Jehovah go out to the tent, but the whole nation looked with the deepest reverence when Moses went out to the tent, and bowed in adoration before the Lord, every one in front of his tent, when they saw the pillar of cloud come down upon the tent and stand before the door. Out of this cloud Jehovah talked with Moses (Exo 33:7-10) “ face to face, as a man talks with his friend ” (Exo 33:11); that is to say, not from the distance of heaven, through any kind of medium whatever, but “mouth to mouth,” as it is called in Num 12:8, as closely and directly as friends talk to one another.
“These words indicate, therefore, a familiar conversation, just as much as if it had been said, that God appeared to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation. If any one objects to this, that it is at variance with the assertion which we shall come to presently, 'Thou canst not see My face,' the answer is a very simple one. Although Jehovah showed Himself to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation, He never appeared in His own essential glory, but only in such a mode as human weakness could bear.
This solution contains a tacit comparison, viz. , that there never was any one equal to Moses, or who had attained to the same dignity as he” (Calvin). When Moses returned to the tent, his servant Joshua remained behind as guard. - This condescension on the part of Jehovah towards Moses could not fail to strengthen the people in their reliance upon their leader, as the confidant of Jehovah.
And Moses himself was encouraged thereby to endeavour to effect a perfect restoration of the covenant bond that had been destroyed.
Exo 33:7-11 Moses then took a tent, and pitched it outside the camp, at some distance off, and called it “ tent of meeting . ” The “tent” is neither the sanctuary of the tabernacle described in Ex 25. , which was not made till after the perfect restoration of the covenant (Ex 35.) , nor another sanctuary that had come down from their forefathers and was used before the tabernacle was built, as Clericus, J.
D. Michaelis, Rosenmüller, and others suppose; but a tent belonging to Moses, which was made into a temporary sanctuary by the fact that the pillar of cloud came down upon it, and Jehovah talked with Moses there, and which was called by the same name as the tabernacle, viz. , מועד אחל (see at Exo 27:21), because Jehovah revealed Himself there, and every one who sought Him had to go to this tent outside the camp.
There were two reasons for this: in the first place, Moses desired thereby to lead the people to a fuller recognition of their separation from their God, that their penitence might be deepened in consequence; and in the second place, he wished to provide such means of intercourse with Jehovah as would not only awaken in the minds of the people a longing for the renewal of the covenant, but render the restoration of the covenant possible. And this end was answered.
Not only did every one who sought Jehovah go out to the tent, but the whole nation looked with the deepest reverence when Moses went out to the tent, and bowed in adoration before the Lord, every one in front of his tent, when they saw the pillar of cloud come down upon the tent and stand before the door. Out of this cloud Jehovah talked with Moses (Exo 33:7-10) “ face to face, as a man talks with his friend ” (Exo 33:11); that is to say, not from the distance of heaven, through any kind of medium whatever, but “mouth to mouth,” as it is called in Num 12:8, as closely and directly as friends talk to one another.
“These words indicate, therefore, a familiar conversation, just as much as if it had been said, that God appeared to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation. If any one objects to this, that it is at variance with the assertion which we shall come to presently, 'Thou canst not see My face,' the answer is a very simple one. Although Jehovah showed Himself to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation, He never appeared in His own essential glory, but only in such a mode as human weakness could bear.
This solution contains a tacit comparison, viz. , that there never was any one equal to Moses, or who had attained to the same dignity as he” (Calvin). When Moses returned to the tent, his servant Joshua remained behind as guard. - This condescension on the part of Jehovah towards Moses could not fail to strengthen the people in their reliance upon their leader, as the confidant of Jehovah.
And Moses himself was encouraged thereby to endeavour to effect a perfect restoration of the covenant bond that had been destroyed.
Exo 33:7-11 Moses then took a tent, and pitched it outside the camp, at some distance off, and called it “ tent of meeting . ” The “tent” is neither the sanctuary of the tabernacle described in Ex 25. , which was not made till after the perfect restoration of the covenant (Ex 35.) , nor another sanctuary that had come down from their forefathers and was used before the tabernacle was built, as Clericus, J.
D. Michaelis, Rosenmüller, and others suppose; but a tent belonging to Moses, which was made into a temporary sanctuary by the fact that the pillar of cloud came down upon it, and Jehovah talked with Moses there, and which was called by the same name as the tabernacle, viz. , מועד אחל (see at Exo 27:21), because Jehovah revealed Himself there, and every one who sought Him had to go to this tent outside the camp.
There were two reasons for this: in the first place, Moses desired thereby to lead the people to a fuller recognition of their separation from their God, that their penitence might be deepened in consequence; and in the second place, he wished to provide such means of intercourse with Jehovah as would not only awaken in the minds of the people a longing for the renewal of the covenant, but render the restoration of the covenant possible. And this end was answered.
Not only did every one who sought Jehovah go out to the tent, but the whole nation looked with the deepest reverence when Moses went out to the tent, and bowed in adoration before the Lord, every one in front of his tent, when they saw the pillar of cloud come down upon the tent and stand before the door. Out of this cloud Jehovah talked with Moses (Exo 33:7-10) “ face to face, as a man talks with his friend ” (Exo 33:11); that is to say, not from the distance of heaven, through any kind of medium whatever, but “mouth to mouth,” as it is called in Num 12:8, as closely and directly as friends talk to one another.
“These words indicate, therefore, a familiar conversation, just as much as if it had been said, that God appeared to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation. If any one objects to this, that it is at variance with the assertion which we shall come to presently, 'Thou canst not see My face,' the answer is a very simple one. Although Jehovah showed Himself to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation, He never appeared in His own essential glory, but only in such a mode as human weakness could bear.
This solution contains a tacit comparison, viz. , that there never was any one equal to Moses, or who had attained to the same dignity as he” (Calvin). When Moses returned to the tent, his servant Joshua remained behind as guard. - This condescension on the part of Jehovah towards Moses could not fail to strengthen the people in their reliance upon their leader, as the confidant of Jehovah.
And Moses himself was encouraged thereby to endeavour to effect a perfect restoration of the covenant bond that had been destroyed.
Exo 33:7-11 Moses then took a tent, and pitched it outside the camp, at some distance off, and called it “ tent of meeting . ” The “tent” is neither the sanctuary of the tabernacle described in Ex 25. , which was not made till after the perfect restoration of the covenant (Ex 35.) , nor another sanctuary that had come down from their forefathers and was used before the tabernacle was built, as Clericus, J.
D. Michaelis, Rosenmüller, and others suppose; but a tent belonging to Moses, which was made into a temporary sanctuary by the fact that the pillar of cloud came down upon it, and Jehovah talked with Moses there, and which was called by the same name as the tabernacle, viz. , מועד אחל (see at Exo 27:21), because Jehovah revealed Himself there, and every one who sought Him had to go to this tent outside the camp.
There were two reasons for this: in the first place, Moses desired thereby to lead the people to a fuller recognition of their separation from their God, that their penitence might be deepened in consequence; and in the second place, he wished to provide such means of intercourse with Jehovah as would not only awaken in the minds of the people a longing for the renewal of the covenant, but render the restoration of the covenant possible. And this end was answered.
Not only did every one who sought Jehovah go out to the tent, but the whole nation looked with the deepest reverence when Moses went out to the tent, and bowed in adoration before the Lord, every one in front of his tent, when they saw the pillar of cloud come down upon the tent and stand before the door. Out of this cloud Jehovah talked with Moses (Exo 33:7-10) “ face to face, as a man talks with his friend ” (Exo 33:11); that is to say, not from the distance of heaven, through any kind of medium whatever, but “mouth to mouth,” as it is called in Num 12:8, as closely and directly as friends talk to one another.
“These words indicate, therefore, a familiar conversation, just as much as if it had been said, that God appeared to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation. If any one objects to this, that it is at variance with the assertion which we shall come to presently, 'Thou canst not see My face,' the answer is a very simple one. Although Jehovah showed Himself to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation, He never appeared in His own essential glory, but only in such a mode as human weakness could bear.
This solution contains a tacit comparison, viz. , that there never was any one equal to Moses, or who had attained to the same dignity as he” (Calvin). When Moses returned to the tent, his servant Joshua remained behind as guard. - This condescension on the part of Jehovah towards Moses could not fail to strengthen the people in their reliance upon their leader, as the confidant of Jehovah.
And Moses himself was encouraged thereby to endeavour to effect a perfect restoration of the covenant bond that had been destroyed.
Exo 33:7-11 Moses then took a tent, and pitched it outside the camp, at some distance off, and called it “ tent of meeting . ” The “tent” is neither the sanctuary of the tabernacle described in Ex 25. , which was not made till after the perfect restoration of the covenant (Ex 35.) , nor another sanctuary that had come down from their forefathers and was used before the tabernacle was built, as Clericus, J.
D. Michaelis, Rosenmüller, and others suppose; but a tent belonging to Moses, which was made into a temporary sanctuary by the fact that the pillar of cloud came down upon it, and Jehovah talked with Moses there, and which was called by the same name as the tabernacle, viz. , מועד אחל (see at Exo 27:21), because Jehovah revealed Himself there, and every one who sought Him had to go to this tent outside the camp.
There were two reasons for this: in the first place, Moses desired thereby to lead the people to a fuller recognition of their separation from their God, that their penitence might be deepened in consequence; and in the second place, he wished to provide such means of intercourse with Jehovah as would not only awaken in the minds of the people a longing for the renewal of the covenant, but render the restoration of the covenant possible. And this end was answered.
Not only did every one who sought Jehovah go out to the tent, but the whole nation looked with the deepest reverence when Moses went out to the tent, and bowed in adoration before the Lord, every one in front of his tent, when they saw the pillar of cloud come down upon the tent and stand before the door. Out of this cloud Jehovah talked with Moses (Exo 33:7-10) “ face to face, as a man talks with his friend ” (Exo 33:11); that is to say, not from the distance of heaven, through any kind of medium whatever, but “mouth to mouth,” as it is called in Num 12:8, as closely and directly as friends talk to one another.
“These words indicate, therefore, a familiar conversation, just as much as if it had been said, that God appeared to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation. If any one objects to this, that it is at variance with the assertion which we shall come to presently, 'Thou canst not see My face,' the answer is a very simple one. Although Jehovah showed Himself to Moses in some peculiar form of manifestation, He never appeared in His own essential glory, but only in such a mode as human weakness could bear.
This solution contains a tacit comparison, viz. , that there never was any one equal to Moses, or who had attained to the same dignity as he” (Calvin). When Moses returned to the tent, his servant Joshua remained behind as guard. - This condescension on the part of Jehovah towards Moses could not fail to strengthen the people in their reliance upon their leader, as the confidant of Jehovah.
And Moses himself was encouraged thereby to endeavour to effect a perfect restoration of the covenant bond that had been destroyed.
Exo 33:12-17 Jehovah had commanded Moses to lead the people to Canaan, and promised him the guidance of an angel; but He had expressly distinguished this angel from His own personal presence (Exo 33:1-3). Moreover, though it has not been mentioned before, Jehovah had said to Moses, “ I have known thee by name, ” - i. e. , I have recognised thee as Mine, and chosen and called thee to execute My will (cf.
Isa 43:1; Isa 49:1), or put thee into “a specifically personal relation to God, which was peculiar to Moses, and therefore was associated with his name” ( Oehler ); - “ and thou hast also found grace in My eyes, ” inasmuch as God had granted a hearing to his former intercession. Moses now reminded the Lord of this divine assurance with such courage as can only be produced by faith, which wrestles with God and will not let Him go without a blessing (Gen 32:27); and upon the strength of this he presented the petition (Exo 33:13), “ Let me know Thy way (the way which Thou wilt take with me and with this people), that I may know Thee, in order that I may find grace in Thine eyes, and see that this people is Thy people .
” The meaning is this: If I have found grace in Thy sight, and Thou hast recognised me as Thy servant, and called me to be the leader of this people, do not leave me in uncertainty as to Thine intentions concerning the people, or as to the angel whom Thou wilt give as a guide to me and the nation, that I may know Thee, that is to say, that my finding grace in Thine eyes may become a reality; and if Thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that it is Thine own people, to whom Thou must acknowledge Thyself as its God. Such boldness of undoubting faith presses to the heart of God, and brings away the blessing.
Jehovah replied (Exo 33:14), “ My face will go, and I shall give thee rest, ” - that is to say, shall bring thee and all this people into the land, where ye will find rest (Deu 3:20). The “face” of Jehovah is Jehovah in His own personal presence, and is identical with the “angel” in whom the name of Jehovah was (Exo 23:20-21), and who is therefore called in Isa 63:9 “the angel of His face.
” With this assurance on the part of God, the covenant bond was completely restored. But to make more sure of it. Moses replied (Exo 33:15, Exo 33:16), “ If Thy face is not going (with us), lead us not up hence. And whereby shall it be known that I have found grace in thine eyes, I and Thy people, if not (lit. , is it not known) in Thy going with us, that we, I and Thy people, are distinguished (see at Exo 8:18) before every nation upon the face of the earth?
” These words do not express any doubt as to the truth of the divine assurance, “but a certain feeling of the insufficiency of the assurance,” inasmuch as even with the restoration of the former condition of things there still remained “the fear lest the evil root of the people’s rebellion, which had once manifested itself, should bread forth again at any moment” ( Baumgarten ). For this reason Jehovah assured him that this request also should be granted (Exo 33:17).
“There was nothing extraordinary in the fact that Moses desired for himself and his people that they might be distinguished before every nation upon the face of the earth; this was merely the firm hold of faith upon the calling and election of God (Exo 19:5-6). ”
Exo 33:12-17 Jehovah had commanded Moses to lead the people to Canaan, and promised him the guidance of an angel; but He had expressly distinguished this angel from His own personal presence (Exo 33:1-3). Moreover, though it has not been mentioned before, Jehovah had said to Moses, “ I have known thee by name, ” - i. e. , I have recognised thee as Mine, and chosen and called thee to execute My will (cf.
Isa 43:1; Isa 49:1), or put thee into “a specifically personal relation to God, which was peculiar to Moses, and therefore was associated with his name” ( Oehler ); - “ and thou hast also found grace in My eyes, ” inasmuch as God had granted a hearing to his former intercession. Moses now reminded the Lord of this divine assurance with such courage as can only be produced by faith, which wrestles with God and will not let Him go without a blessing (Gen 32:27); and upon the strength of this he presented the petition (Exo 33:13), “ Let me know Thy way (the way which Thou wilt take with me and with this people), that I may know Thee, in order that I may find grace in Thine eyes, and see that this people is Thy people .
” The meaning is this: If I have found grace in Thy sight, and Thou hast recognised me as Thy servant, and called me to be the leader of this people, do not leave me in uncertainty as to Thine intentions concerning the people, or as to the angel whom Thou wilt give as a guide to me and the nation, that I may know Thee, that is to say, that my finding grace in Thine eyes may become a reality; and if Thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that it is Thine own people, to whom Thou must acknowledge Thyself as its God. Such boldness of undoubting faith presses to the heart of God, and brings away the blessing.
Jehovah replied (Exo 33:14), “ My face will go, and I shall give thee rest, ” - that is to say, shall bring thee and all this people into the land, where ye will find rest (Deu 3:20). The “face” of Jehovah is Jehovah in His own personal presence, and is identical with the “angel” in whom the name of Jehovah was (Exo 23:20-21), and who is therefore called in Isa 63:9 “the angel of His face.
” With this assurance on the part of God, the covenant bond was completely restored. But to make more sure of it. Moses replied (Exo 33:15, Exo 33:16), “ If Thy face is not going (with us), lead us not up hence. And whereby shall it be known that I have found grace in thine eyes, I and Thy people, if not (lit. , is it not known) in Thy going with us, that we, I and Thy people, are distinguished (see at Exo 8:18) before every nation upon the face of the earth?
” These words do not express any doubt as to the truth of the divine assurance, “but a certain feeling of the insufficiency of the assurance,” inasmuch as even with the restoration of the former condition of things there still remained “the fear lest the evil root of the people’s rebellion, which had once manifested itself, should bread forth again at any moment” ( Baumgarten ). For this reason Jehovah assured him that this request also should be granted (Exo 33:17).
“There was nothing extraordinary in the fact that Moses desired for himself and his people that they might be distinguished before every nation upon the face of the earth; this was merely the firm hold of faith upon the calling and election of God (Exo 19:5-6). ”
Exo 33:12-17 Jehovah had commanded Moses to lead the people to Canaan, and promised him the guidance of an angel; but He had expressly distinguished this angel from His own personal presence (Exo 33:1-3). Moreover, though it has not been mentioned before, Jehovah had said to Moses, “ I have known thee by name, ” - i. e. , I have recognised thee as Mine, and chosen and called thee to execute My will (cf.
Isa 43:1; Isa 49:1), or put thee into “a specifically personal relation to God, which was peculiar to Moses, and therefore was associated with his name” ( Oehler ); - “ and thou hast also found grace in My eyes, ” inasmuch as God had granted a hearing to his former intercession. Moses now reminded the Lord of this divine assurance with such courage as can only be produced by faith, which wrestles with God and will not let Him go without a blessing (Gen 32:27); and upon the strength of this he presented the petition (Exo 33:13), “ Let me know Thy way (the way which Thou wilt take with me and with this people), that I may know Thee, in order that I may find grace in Thine eyes, and see that this people is Thy people .
” The meaning is this: If I have found grace in Thy sight, and Thou hast recognised me as Thy servant, and called me to be the leader of this people, do not leave me in uncertainty as to Thine intentions concerning the people, or as to the angel whom Thou wilt give as a guide to me and the nation, that I may know Thee, that is to say, that my finding grace in Thine eyes may become a reality; and if Thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that it is Thine own people, to whom Thou must acknowledge Thyself as its God. Such boldness of undoubting faith presses to the heart of God, and brings away the blessing.
Jehovah replied (Exo 33:14), “ My face will go, and I shall give thee rest, ” - that is to say, shall bring thee and all this people into the land, where ye will find rest (Deu 3:20). The “face” of Jehovah is Jehovah in His own personal presence, and is identical with the “angel” in whom the name of Jehovah was (Exo 23:20-21), and who is therefore called in Isa 63:9 “the angel of His face.
” With this assurance on the part of God, the covenant bond was completely restored. But to make more sure of it. Moses replied (Exo 33:15, Exo 33:16), “ If Thy face is not going (with us), lead us not up hence. And whereby shall it be known that I have found grace in thine eyes, I and Thy people, if not (lit. , is it not known) in Thy going with us, that we, I and Thy people, are distinguished (see at Exo 8:18) before every nation upon the face of the earth?
” These words do not express any doubt as to the truth of the divine assurance, “but a certain feeling of the insufficiency of the assurance,” inasmuch as even with the restoration of the former condition of things there still remained “the fear lest the evil root of the people’s rebellion, which had once manifested itself, should bread forth again at any moment” ( Baumgarten ). For this reason Jehovah assured him that this request also should be granted (Exo 33:17).
“There was nothing extraordinary in the fact that Moses desired for himself and his people that they might be distinguished before every nation upon the face of the earth; this was merely the firm hold of faith upon the calling and election of God (Exo 19:5-6). ”
Exo 33:12-17 Jehovah had commanded Moses to lead the people to Canaan, and promised him the guidance of an angel; but He had expressly distinguished this angel from His own personal presence (Exo 33:1-3). Moreover, though it has not been mentioned before, Jehovah had said to Moses, “ I have known thee by name, ” - i. e. , I have recognised thee as Mine, and chosen and called thee to execute My will (cf.
Isa 43:1; Isa 49:1), or put thee into “a specifically personal relation to God, which was peculiar to Moses, and therefore was associated with his name” ( Oehler ); - “ and thou hast also found grace in My eyes, ” inasmuch as God had granted a hearing to his former intercession. Moses now reminded the Lord of this divine assurance with such courage as can only be produced by faith, which wrestles with God and will not let Him go without a blessing (Gen 32:27); and upon the strength of this he presented the petition (Exo 33:13), “ Let me know Thy way (the way which Thou wilt take with me and with this people), that I may know Thee, in order that I may find grace in Thine eyes, and see that this people is Thy people .
” The meaning is this: If I have found grace in Thy sight, and Thou hast recognised me as Thy servant, and called me to be the leader of this people, do not leave me in uncertainty as to Thine intentions concerning the people, or as to the angel whom Thou wilt give as a guide to me and the nation, that I may know Thee, that is to say, that my finding grace in Thine eyes may become a reality; and if Thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that it is Thine own people, to whom Thou must acknowledge Thyself as its God. Such boldness of undoubting faith presses to the heart of God, and brings away the blessing.
Jehovah replied (Exo 33:14), “ My face will go, and I shall give thee rest, ” - that is to say, shall bring thee and all this people into the land, where ye will find rest (Deu 3:20). The “face” of Jehovah is Jehovah in His own personal presence, and is identical with the “angel” in whom the name of Jehovah was (Exo 23:20-21), and who is therefore called in Isa 63:9 “the angel of His face.
” With this assurance on the part of God, the covenant bond was completely restored. But to make more sure of it. Moses replied (Exo 33:15, Exo 33:16), “ If Thy face is not going (with us), lead us not up hence. And whereby shall it be known that I have found grace in thine eyes, I and Thy people, if not (lit. , is it not known) in Thy going with us, that we, I and Thy people, are distinguished (see at Exo 8:18) before every nation upon the face of the earth?
” These words do not express any doubt as to the truth of the divine assurance, “but a certain feeling of the insufficiency of the assurance,” inasmuch as even with the restoration of the former condition of things there still remained “the fear lest the evil root of the people’s rebellion, which had once manifested itself, should bread forth again at any moment” ( Baumgarten ). For this reason Jehovah assured him that this request also should be granted (Exo 33:17).
“There was nothing extraordinary in the fact that Moses desired for himself and his people that they might be distinguished before every nation upon the face of the earth; this was merely the firm hold of faith upon the calling and election of God (Exo 19:5-6). ”
Exo 33:12-17 Jehovah had commanded Moses to lead the people to Canaan, and promised him the guidance of an angel; but He had expressly distinguished this angel from His own personal presence (Exo 33:1-3). Moreover, though it has not been mentioned before, Jehovah had said to Moses, “ I have known thee by name, ” - i. e. , I have recognised thee as Mine, and chosen and called thee to execute My will (cf.
Isa 43:1; Isa 49:1), or put thee into “a specifically personal relation to God, which was peculiar to Moses, and therefore was associated with his name” ( Oehler ); - “ and thou hast also found grace in My eyes, ” inasmuch as God had granted a hearing to his former intercession. Moses now reminded the Lord of this divine assurance with such courage as can only be produced by faith, which wrestles with God and will not let Him go without a blessing (Gen 32:27); and upon the strength of this he presented the petition (Exo 33:13), “ Let me know Thy way (the way which Thou wilt take with me and with this people), that I may know Thee, in order that I may find grace in Thine eyes, and see that this people is Thy people .
” The meaning is this: If I have found grace in Thy sight, and Thou hast recognised me as Thy servant, and called me to be the leader of this people, do not leave me in uncertainty as to Thine intentions concerning the people, or as to the angel whom Thou wilt give as a guide to me and the nation, that I may know Thee, that is to say, that my finding grace in Thine eyes may become a reality; and if Thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that it is Thine own people, to whom Thou must acknowledge Thyself as its God. Such boldness of undoubting faith presses to the heart of God, and brings away the blessing.
Jehovah replied (Exo 33:14), “ My face will go, and I shall give thee rest, ” - that is to say, shall bring thee and all this people into the land, where ye will find rest (Deu 3:20). The “face” of Jehovah is Jehovah in His own personal presence, and is identical with the “angel” in whom the name of Jehovah was (Exo 23:20-21), and who is therefore called in Isa 63:9 “the angel of His face.
” With this assurance on the part of God, the covenant bond was completely restored. But to make more sure of it. Moses replied (Exo 33:15, Exo 33:16), “ If Thy face is not going (with us), lead us not up hence. And whereby shall it be known that I have found grace in thine eyes, I and Thy people, if not (lit. , is it not known) in Thy going with us, that we, I and Thy people, are distinguished (see at Exo 8:18) before every nation upon the face of the earth?
” These words do not express any doubt as to the truth of the divine assurance, “but a certain feeling of the insufficiency of the assurance,” inasmuch as even with the restoration of the former condition of things there still remained “the fear lest the evil root of the people’s rebellion, which had once manifested itself, should bread forth again at any moment” ( Baumgarten ). For this reason Jehovah assured him that this request also should be granted (Exo 33:17).
“There was nothing extraordinary in the fact that Moses desired for himself and his people that they might be distinguished before every nation upon the face of the earth; this was merely the firm hold of faith upon the calling and election of God (Exo 19:5-6). ”
Exo 33:12-17 Jehovah had commanded Moses to lead the people to Canaan, and promised him the guidance of an angel; but He had expressly distinguished this angel from His own personal presence (Exo 33:1-3). Moreover, though it has not been mentioned before, Jehovah had said to Moses, “ I have known thee by name, ” - i. e. , I have recognised thee as Mine, and chosen and called thee to execute My will (cf.
Isa 43:1; Isa 49:1), or put thee into “a specifically personal relation to God, which was peculiar to Moses, and therefore was associated with his name” ( Oehler ); - “ and thou hast also found grace in My eyes, ” inasmuch as God had granted a hearing to his former intercession. Moses now reminded the Lord of this divine assurance with such courage as can only be produced by faith, which wrestles with God and will not let Him go without a blessing (Gen 32:27); and upon the strength of this he presented the petition (Exo 33:13), “ Let me know Thy way (the way which Thou wilt take with me and with this people), that I may know Thee, in order that I may find grace in Thine eyes, and see that this people is Thy people .
” The meaning is this: If I have found grace in Thy sight, and Thou hast recognised me as Thy servant, and called me to be the leader of this people, do not leave me in uncertainty as to Thine intentions concerning the people, or as to the angel whom Thou wilt give as a guide to me and the nation, that I may know Thee, that is to say, that my finding grace in Thine eyes may become a reality; and if Thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that it is Thine own people, to whom Thou must acknowledge Thyself as its God. Such boldness of undoubting faith presses to the heart of God, and brings away the blessing.
Jehovah replied (Exo 33:14), “ My face will go, and I shall give thee rest, ” - that is to say, shall bring thee and all this people into the land, where ye will find rest (Deu 3:20). The “face” of Jehovah is Jehovah in His own personal presence, and is identical with the “angel” in whom the name of Jehovah was (Exo 23:20-21), and who is therefore called in Isa 63:9 “the angel of His face.
” With this assurance on the part of God, the covenant bond was completely restored. But to make more sure of it. Moses replied (Exo 33:15, Exo 33:16), “ If Thy face is not going (with us), lead us not up hence. And whereby shall it be known that I have found grace in thine eyes, I and Thy people, if not (lit. , is it not known) in Thy going with us, that we, I and Thy people, are distinguished (see at Exo 8:18) before every nation upon the face of the earth?
” These words do not express any doubt as to the truth of the divine assurance, “but a certain feeling of the insufficiency of the assurance,” inasmuch as even with the restoration of the former condition of things there still remained “the fear lest the evil root of the people’s rebellion, which had once manifested itself, should bread forth again at any moment” ( Baumgarten ). For this reason Jehovah assured him that this request also should be granted (Exo 33:17).
“There was nothing extraordinary in the fact that Moses desired for himself and his people that they might be distinguished before every nation upon the face of the earth; this was merely the firm hold of faith upon the calling and election of God (Exo 19:5-6). ”
Exo 33:18-23 Moses was emboldened by this, and now prayed to the Lord, “ Let me see Thy glory . ” What Moses desired to see, as the answer of God clearly shows, must have been something surpassing all former revelations of the glory of Jehovah (Exo 16:7, Exo 16:10; Exo 24:16-17), and even going beyond Jehovah’s talking with him face to face (Exo 33:11). When God talked with him face to face, or mouth to mouth, he merely saw a “similitude of Jehovah” (Num 12:8), a form which rendered the invisible being of God visible to the human eye, i.
e. , a manifestation of the divine glory in a certain form, and not the direct or essential glory of Jehovah, whilst the people saw this glory under the veil of a dark cloud, rendered luminous by fire, that is to say, they only saw its splendour as it shone through the cloud; and even the elders, at the time when the covenant was made, only saw the God of Israel in a certain form which hid from their eyes the essential being of God (Exo 24:10-11).
What Moses desired, therefore, was a sight of the glory or essential being of God, without any figure, and without a veil. Moses was urged to offer this prayer, as Calvin truly says, not by “ stulta curiositas, quae ut plurimum titillat hominum mentes, ut audacter penetrare tentent usque ad ultima caelorum arcana, ” but by “a desire to cross the chasm which had been made by the apostasy of the nation, that for the future he might have a firmer footing than the previous history had given him.
As so great a stress had been laid upon his own person in his present task of mediation between the offended Jehovah and the apostate nation, he felt that the separation, which existed between himself and Jehovah, introduced a disturbing element into his office. For if his own personal fellowship with Jehovah was not fully established, and raised above all possibility of disturbance, there could be no eternal foundation for the perpetuity of his mediation” ( Baumgarten ).
As a man called by God to be His servant, he was not yet the perfect mediator; but although he was faithful in all his house, it was only as a servant, called εἰς μαρτύριον τῶν λαληθησομένων (Heb 3:5), i. e. , as a herald of the saving revelations of God, preparing the way for the coming of the perfect Mediator. Jehovah therefore granted his request, but only so far as the limit existing between the infinite and holy God and finite and sinful man allowed.
“ I will make all My goodness pass before thy face, and proclaim the name of Jehovah before thee (בּשׁם קרא see at Gen 4:26), and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy. Thou canst not see My face, for man cannot see Me and live . ” The words וגו וחנּתי, although only connected with the previous clause by the cop .
ו, are to be understood in a causative sense, as expressing the reason why Moses’ request was granted, viz. , that it was an act of unconditional grace and compassion on the part of God, to which no man, not even Moses, could lay any just claim. The apostle Paul uses the words in the same sense in Rom 9:15, for the purpose of overthrowing the claims of self-righteous Jews to participate in the Messianic salvation.
- No mortal man can see the face of God and remain alive; for not only is the holy God a consuming fire to unholy man, but a limit has been set, in and with the σῶμα χοΐκόν and ψυχικόν (the earthly and psychical body) of man, between the infinite God, the absolute Spirit, and the human spirit clothed in an earthly body, which will only be removed by the “redemption of our body,” and our being clothed in a “spiritual body,” and which, so long as it lasts, renders a direct sight of the glory of God impossible. As our bodily eye is dazzled, and its power of vision destroyed, by looking directly at the brightness of the sun, so would our whole nature be destroyed by an unveiled sight of the brilliancy of the glory of God.
So long as we are clothed with this body, which was destined, indeed, from the very first to be transformed into the glorified state of the immortality of the spirit, but has become through the fall a prey to the corruption of death, we can only walk in faith, and only see God with the eye of faith, so far as He has revealed His glory to us in His works and His word. When we have become like God, and have been transformed into the “divine nature” (2Pe 1:4), then, and not till then, shall we see Him as He is; then we shall see His glory without a veil, and live before Him for ever.
For this reason Moses had to content himself with the passing by of the glory of God before his face, and with the revelation of the name of Jehovah through the medium of the word, in which God discloses His inmost being, and, so to speak, His whole heart to faith. In Exo 33:22 “My glory” is used for “all My goodness,” and in Exo 34:6 it is stated that Jehovah passed by before the face of Moses.
טוּב is not to be understood in the sense of beautiful, or beauty, but signifies goodness; not the brilliancy which strikes the senses, but the spiritual and ethical nature of the Divine Being. For the manifestation of Jehovah, which passed before Moses, was intended unquestionably to reveal nothing else than what Jehovah expressed in the proclamation of His name.
The manifested glory of the Lord would so surely be followed by the destruction of man, that even Moses needed to be protected before it (Exo 33:21, Exo 33:22). Whilst Jehovah, therefore, allowed him to come to a place upon the rock near Him, i. e. , upon the summit of Sinai (Exo 34:2), He said that He would put him in a cleft of the rock whilst He was passing by, and cover him with His hand when He had gone by, that he might see His back, because His face could not be seen.
The back, as contrasted with the face, signifies the reflection of the glory of God that had just passed by. The words are transferred anthropomorphically from man to God, because human language and human thought can only conceive of the nature of the absolute Spirit according to the analogy of the human form. As the inward nature of man manifests itself in his face, and the sight of his back gives only an imperfect and outward view of him, so Moses saw only the back and not the face of Jehovah.
It is impossible to put more into human words concerning this unparalleled vision, which far surpasses all human thought and comprehension. According to Exo 34:2, the place where Moses stood by the Lord was at the top (the head) of Sinai, and no more can be determined with certainty concerning it. The cleft in the rock (Exo 33:22) has been supposed by some to be the same place as the “cave” in which Elijah lodged at Horeb, and where the Lord appeared to him in the still small voice (1Ki 19:9.)
The real summit of the Jebel Musa consists of “a small area of huge rocks, about 80 feet in diameter,” upon which there is now a chapel that has almost fallen down, and about 40 feet to the south-west a dilapidated mosque (Robinson, Palestine , vol. i. p. 153). Below this mosque, according to Seetzen ( Reise iii. pp. 83, 84), there is a very small grotto, into which you descend by several steps, and to which a large block of granite, about a fathom and a half long and six spans in height, serves as a roof.
According to the Mussulman tradition, which the Greek monks also accept, it was in this small grotto that Moses received the law; though other monks point out a “hole, just large enough for a man,” near the altar of the Elijah chapel, on the small plain upon the ridge of Sinai, above which the loftier peak rises about 700 feet, as the cave in which Elijah lodged on Horeb (Robinson, Pal. ut supra ).
Exo 33:18-23 Moses was emboldened by this, and now prayed to the Lord, “ Let me see Thy glory . ” What Moses desired to see, as the answer of God clearly shows, must have been something surpassing all former revelations of the glory of Jehovah (Exo 16:7, Exo 16:10; Exo 24:16-17), and even going beyond Jehovah’s talking with him face to face (Exo 33:11). When God talked with him face to face, or mouth to mouth, he merely saw a “similitude of Jehovah” (Num 12:8), a form which rendered the invisible being of God visible to the human eye, i.
e. , a manifestation of the divine glory in a certain form, and not the direct or essential glory of Jehovah, whilst the people saw this glory under the veil of a dark cloud, rendered luminous by fire, that is to say, they only saw its splendour as it shone through the cloud; and even the elders, at the time when the covenant was made, only saw the God of Israel in a certain form which hid from their eyes the essential being of God (Exo 24:10-11).
What Moses desired, therefore, was a sight of the glory or essential being of God, without any figure, and without a veil. Moses was urged to offer this prayer, as Calvin truly says, not by “ stulta curiositas, quae ut plurimum titillat hominum mentes, ut audacter penetrare tentent usque ad ultima caelorum arcana, ” but by “a desire to cross the chasm which had been made by the apostasy of the nation, that for the future he might have a firmer footing than the previous history had given him.
As so great a stress had been laid upon his own person in his present task of mediation between the offended Jehovah and the apostate nation, he felt that the separation, which existed between himself and Jehovah, introduced a disturbing element into his office. For if his own personal fellowship with Jehovah was not fully established, and raised above all possibility of disturbance, there could be no eternal foundation for the perpetuity of his mediation” ( Baumgarten ).
As a man called by God to be His servant, he was not yet the perfect mediator; but although he was faithful in all his house, it was only as a servant, called εἰς μαρτύριον τῶν λαληθησομένων (Heb 3:5), i. e. , as a herald of the saving revelations of God, preparing the way for the coming of the perfect Mediator. Jehovah therefore granted his request, but only so far as the limit existing between the infinite and holy God and finite and sinful man allowed.
“ I will make all My goodness pass before thy face, and proclaim the name of Jehovah before thee (בּשׁם קרא see at Gen 4:26), and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy. Thou canst not see My face, for man cannot see Me and live . ” The words וגו וחנּתי, although only connected with the previous clause by the cop .
ו, are to be understood in a causative sense, as expressing the reason why Moses’ request was granted, viz. , that it was an act of unconditional grace and compassion on the part of God, to which no man, not even Moses, could lay any just claim. The apostle Paul uses the words in the same sense in Rom 9:15, for the purpose of overthrowing the claims of self-righteous Jews to participate in the Messianic salvation.
- No mortal man can see the face of God and remain alive; for not only is the holy God a consuming fire to unholy man, but a limit has been set, in and with the σῶμα χοΐκόν and ψυχικόν (the earthly and psychical body) of man, between the infinite God, the absolute Spirit, and the human spirit clothed in an earthly body, which will only be removed by the “redemption of our body,” and our being clothed in a “spiritual body,” and which, so long as it lasts, renders a direct sight of the glory of God impossible. As our bodily eye is dazzled, and its power of vision destroyed, by looking directly at the brightness of the sun, so would our whole nature be destroyed by an unveiled sight of the brilliancy of the glory of God.
So long as we are clothed with this body, which was destined, indeed, from the very first to be transformed into the glorified state of the immortality of the spirit, but has become through the fall a prey to the corruption of death, we can only walk in faith, and only see God with the eye of faith, so far as He has revealed His glory to us in His works and His word. When we have become like God, and have been transformed into the “divine nature” (2Pe 1:4), then, and not till then, shall we see Him as He is; then we shall see His glory without a veil, and live before Him for ever.
For this reason Moses had to content himself with the passing by of the glory of God before his face, and with the revelation of the name of Jehovah through the medium of the word, in which God discloses His inmost being, and, so to speak, His whole heart to faith. In Exo 33:22 “My glory” is used for “all My goodness,” and in Exo 34:6 it is stated that Jehovah passed by before the face of Moses.
טוּב is not to be understood in the sense of beautiful, or beauty, but signifies goodness; not the brilliancy which strikes the senses, but the spiritual and ethical nature of the Divine Being. For the manifestation of Jehovah, which passed before Moses, was intended unquestionably to reveal nothing else than what Jehovah expressed in the proclamation of His name.
The manifested glory of the Lord would so surely be followed by the destruction of man, that even Moses needed to be protected before it (Exo 33:21, Exo 33:22). Whilst Jehovah, therefore, allowed him to come to a place upon the rock near Him, i. e. , upon the summit of Sinai (Exo 34:2), He said that He would put him in a cleft of the rock whilst He was passing by, and cover him with His hand when He had gone by, that he might see His back, because His face could not be seen.
The back, as contrasted with the face, signifies the reflection of the glory of God that had just passed by. The words are transferred anthropomorphically from man to God, because human language and human thought can only conceive of the nature of the absolute Spirit according to the analogy of the human form. As the inward nature of man manifests itself in his face, and the sight of his back gives only an imperfect and outward view of him, so Moses saw only the back and not the face of Jehovah.
It is impossible to put more into human words concerning this unparalleled vision, which far surpasses all human thought and comprehension. According to Exo 34:2, the place where Moses stood by the Lord was at the top (the head) of Sinai, and no more can be determined with certainty concerning it. The cleft in the rock (Exo 33:22) has been supposed by some to be the same place as the “cave” in which Elijah lodged at Horeb, and where the Lord appeared to him in the still small voice (1Ki 19:9.)
The real summit of the Jebel Musa consists of “a small area of huge rocks, about 80 feet in diameter,” upon which there is now a chapel that has almost fallen down, and about 40 feet to the south-west a dilapidated mosque (Robinson, Palestine , vol. i. p. 153). Below this mosque, according to Seetzen ( Reise iii. pp. 83, 84), there is a very small grotto, into which you descend by several steps, and to which a large block of granite, about a fathom and a half long and six spans in height, serves as a roof.
According to the Mussulman tradition, which the Greek monks also accept, it was in this small grotto that Moses received the law; though other monks point out a “hole, just large enough for a man,” near the altar of the Elijah chapel, on the small plain upon the ridge of Sinai, above which the loftier peak rises about 700 feet, as the cave in which Elijah lodged on Horeb (Robinson, Pal. ut supra ).
Exo 33:18-23 Moses was emboldened by this, and now prayed to the Lord, “ Let me see Thy glory . ” What Moses desired to see, as the answer of God clearly shows, must have been something surpassing all former revelations of the glory of Jehovah (Exo 16:7, Exo 16:10; Exo 24:16-17), and even going beyond Jehovah’s talking with him face to face (Exo 33:11). When God talked with him face to face, or mouth to mouth, he merely saw a “similitude of Jehovah” (Num 12:8), a form which rendered the invisible being of God visible to the human eye, i.
e. , a manifestation of the divine glory in a certain form, and not the direct or essential glory of Jehovah, whilst the people saw this glory under the veil of a dark cloud, rendered luminous by fire, that is to say, they only saw its splendour as it shone through the cloud; and even the elders, at the time when the covenant was made, only saw the God of Israel in a certain form which hid from their eyes the essential being of God (Exo 24:10-11).
What Moses desired, therefore, was a sight of the glory or essential being of God, without any figure, and without a veil. Moses was urged to offer this prayer, as Calvin truly says, not by “ stulta curiositas, quae ut plurimum titillat hominum mentes, ut audacter penetrare tentent usque ad ultima caelorum arcana, ” but by “a desire to cross the chasm which had been made by the apostasy of the nation, that for the future he might have a firmer footing than the previous history had given him.
As so great a stress had been laid upon his own person in his present task of mediation between the offended Jehovah and the apostate nation, he felt that the separation, which existed between himself and Jehovah, introduced a disturbing element into his office. For if his own personal fellowship with Jehovah was not fully established, and raised above all possibility of disturbance, there could be no eternal foundation for the perpetuity of his mediation” ( Baumgarten ).
As a man called by God to be His servant, he was not yet the perfect mediator; but although he was faithful in all his house, it was only as a servant, called εἰς μαρτύριον τῶν λαληθησομένων (Heb 3:5), i. e. , as a herald of the saving revelations of God, preparing the way for the coming of the perfect Mediator. Jehovah therefore granted his request, but only so far as the limit existing between the infinite and holy God and finite and sinful man allowed.
“ I will make all My goodness pass before thy face, and proclaim the name of Jehovah before thee (בּשׁם קרא see at Gen 4:26), and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy. Thou canst not see My face, for man cannot see Me and live . ” The words וגו וחנּתי, although only connected with the previous clause by the cop .
ו, are to be understood in a causative sense, as expressing the reason why Moses’ request was granted, viz. , that it was an act of unconditional grace and compassion on the part of God, to which no man, not even Moses, could lay any just claim. The apostle Paul uses the words in the same sense in Rom 9:15, for the purpose of overthrowing the claims of self-righteous Jews to participate in the Messianic salvation.
- No mortal man can see the face of God and remain alive; for not only is the holy God a consuming fire to unholy man, but a limit has been set, in and with the σῶμα χοΐκόν and ψυχικόν (the earthly and psychical body) of man, between the infinite God, the absolute Spirit, and the human spirit clothed in an earthly body, which will only be removed by the “redemption of our body,” and our being clothed in a “spiritual body,” and which, so long as it lasts, renders a direct sight of the glory of God impossible. As our bodily eye is dazzled, and its power of vision destroyed, by looking directly at the brightness of the sun, so would our whole nature be destroyed by an unveiled sight of the brilliancy of the glory of God.
So long as we are clothed with this body, which was destined, indeed, from the very first to be transformed into the glorified state of the immortality of the spirit, but has become through the fall a prey to the corruption of death, we can only walk in faith, and only see God with the eye of faith, so far as He has revealed His glory to us in His works and His word. When we have become like God, and have been transformed into the “divine nature” (2Pe 1:4), then, and not till then, shall we see Him as He is; then we shall see His glory without a veil, and live before Him for ever.
For this reason Moses had to content himself with the passing by of the glory of God before his face, and with the revelation of the name of Jehovah through the medium of the word, in which God discloses His inmost being, and, so to speak, His whole heart to faith. In Exo 33:22 “My glory” is used for “all My goodness,” and in Exo 34:6 it is stated that Jehovah passed by before the face of Moses.
טוּב is not to be understood in the sense of beautiful, or beauty, but signifies goodness; not the brilliancy which strikes the senses, but the spiritual and ethical nature of the Divine Being. For the manifestation of Jehovah, which passed before Moses, was intended unquestionably to reveal nothing else than what Jehovah expressed in the proclamation of His name.
The manifested glory of the Lord would so surely be followed by the destruction of man, that even Moses needed to be protected before it (Exo 33:21, Exo 33:22). Whilst Jehovah, therefore, allowed him to come to a place upon the rock near Him, i. e. , upon the summit of Sinai (Exo 34:2), He said that He would put him in a cleft of the rock whilst He was passing by, and cover him with His hand when He had gone by, that he might see His back, because His face could not be seen.
The back, as contrasted with the face, signifies the reflection of the glory of God that had just passed by. The words are transferred anthropomorphically from man to God, because human language and human thought can only conceive of the nature of the absolute Spirit according to the analogy of the human form. As the inward nature of man manifests itself in his face, and the sight of his back gives only an imperfect and outward view of him, so Moses saw only the back and not the face of Jehovah.
It is impossible to put more into human words concerning this unparalleled vision, which far surpasses all human thought and comprehension. According to Exo 34:2, the place where Moses stood by the Lord was at the top (the head) of Sinai, and no more can be determined with certainty concerning it. The cleft in the rock (Exo 33:22) has been supposed by some to be the same place as the “cave” in which Elijah lodged at Horeb, and where the Lord appeared to him in the still small voice (1Ki 19:9.)
The real summit of the Jebel Musa consists of “a small area of huge rocks, about 80 feet in diameter,” upon which there is now a chapel that has almost fallen down, and about 40 feet to the south-west a dilapidated mosque (Robinson, Palestine , vol. i. p. 153). Below this mosque, according to Seetzen ( Reise iii. pp. 83, 84), there is a very small grotto, into which you descend by several steps, and to which a large block of granite, about a fathom and a half long and six spans in height, serves as a roof.
According to the Mussulman tradition, which the Greek monks also accept, it was in this small grotto that Moses received the law; though other monks point out a “hole, just large enough for a man,” near the altar of the Elijah chapel, on the small plain upon the ridge of Sinai, above which the loftier peak rises about 700 feet, as the cave in which Elijah lodged on Horeb (Robinson, Pal. ut supra ).
Exo 33:18-23 Moses was emboldened by this, and now prayed to the Lord, “ Let me see Thy glory . ” What Moses desired to see, as the answer of God clearly shows, must have been something surpassing all former revelations of the glory of Jehovah (Exo 16:7, Exo 16:10; Exo 24:16-17), and even going beyond Jehovah’s talking with him face to face (Exo 33:11). When God talked with him face to face, or mouth to mouth, he merely saw a “similitude of Jehovah” (Num 12:8), a form which rendered the invisible being of God visible to the human eye, i.
e. , a manifestation of the divine glory in a certain form, and not the direct or essential glory of Jehovah, whilst the people saw this glory under the veil of a dark cloud, rendered luminous by fire, that is to say, they only saw its splendour as it shone through the cloud; and even the elders, at the time when the covenant was made, only saw the God of Israel in a certain form which hid from their eyes the essential being of God (Exo 24:10-11).
What Moses desired, therefore, was a sight of the glory or essential being of God, without any figure, and without a veil. Moses was urged to offer this prayer, as Calvin truly says, not by “ stulta curiositas, quae ut plurimum titillat hominum mentes, ut audacter penetrare tentent usque ad ultima caelorum arcana, ” but by “a desire to cross the chasm which had been made by the apostasy of the nation, that for the future he might have a firmer footing than the previous history had given him.
As so great a stress had been laid upon his own person in his present task of mediation between the offended Jehovah and the apostate nation, he felt that the separation, which existed between himself and Jehovah, introduced a disturbing element into his office. For if his own personal fellowship with Jehovah was not fully established, and raised above all possibility of disturbance, there could be no eternal foundation for the perpetuity of his mediation” ( Baumgarten ).
As a man called by God to be His servant, he was not yet the perfect mediator; but although he was faithful in all his house, it was only as a servant, called εἰς μαρτύριον τῶν λαληθησομένων (Heb 3:5), i. e. , as a herald of the saving revelations of God, preparing the way for the coming of the perfect Mediator. Jehovah therefore granted his request, but only so far as the limit existing between the infinite and holy God and finite and sinful man allowed.
“ I will make all My goodness pass before thy face, and proclaim the name of Jehovah before thee (בּשׁם קרא see at Gen 4:26), and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy. Thou canst not see My face, for man cannot see Me and live . ” The words וגו וחנּתי, although only connected with the previous clause by the cop .
ו, are to be understood in a causative sense, as expressing the reason why Moses’ request was granted, viz. , that it was an act of unconditional grace and compassion on the part of God, to which no man, not even Moses, could lay any just claim. The apostle Paul uses the words in the same sense in Rom 9:15, for the purpose of overthrowing the claims of self-righteous Jews to participate in the Messianic salvation.
- No mortal man can see the face of God and remain alive; for not only is the holy God a consuming fire to unholy man, but a limit has been set, in and with the σῶμα χοΐκόν and ψυχικόν (the earthly and psychical body) of man, between the infinite God, the absolute Spirit, and the human spirit clothed in an earthly body, which will only be removed by the “redemption of our body,” and our being clothed in a “spiritual body,” and which, so long as it lasts, renders a direct sight of the glory of God impossible. As our bodily eye is dazzled, and its power of vision destroyed, by looking directly at the brightness of the sun, so would our whole nature be destroyed by an unveiled sight of the brilliancy of the glory of God.
So long as we are clothed with this body, which was destined, indeed, from the very first to be transformed into the glorified state of the immortality of the spirit, but has become through the fall a prey to the corruption of death, we can only walk in faith, and only see God with the eye of faith, so far as He has revealed His glory to us in His works and His word. When we have become like God, and have been transformed into the “divine nature” (2Pe 1:4), then, and not till then, shall we see Him as He is; then we shall see His glory without a veil, and live before Him for ever.
For this reason Moses had to content himself with the passing by of the glory of God before his face, and with the revelation of the name of Jehovah through the medium of the word, in which God discloses His inmost being, and, so to speak, His whole heart to faith. In Exo 33:22 “My glory” is used for “all My goodness,” and in Exo 34:6 it is stated that Jehovah passed by before the face of Moses.
טוּב is not to be understood in the sense of beautiful, or beauty, but signifies goodness; not the brilliancy which strikes the senses, but the spiritual and ethical nature of the Divine Being. For the manifestation of Jehovah, which passed before Moses, was intended unquestionably to reveal nothing else than what Jehovah expressed in the proclamation of His name.
The manifested glory of the Lord would so surely be followed by the destruction of man, that even Moses needed to be protected before it (Exo 33:21, Exo 33:22). Whilst Jehovah, therefore, allowed him to come to a place upon the rock near Him, i. e. , upon the summit of Sinai (Exo 34:2), He said that He would put him in a cleft of the rock whilst He was passing by, and cover him with His hand when He had gone by, that he might see His back, because His face could not be seen.
The back, as contrasted with the face, signifies the reflection of the glory of God that had just passed by. The words are transferred anthropomorphically from man to God, because human language and human thought can only conceive of the nature of the absolute Spirit according to the analogy of the human form. As the inward nature of man manifests itself in his face, and the sight of his back gives only an imperfect and outward view of him, so Moses saw only the back and not the face of Jehovah.
It is impossible to put more into human words concerning this unparalleled vision, which far surpasses all human thought and comprehension. According to Exo 34:2, the place where Moses stood by the Lord was at the top (the head) of Sinai, and no more can be determined with certainty concerning it. The cleft in the rock (Exo 33:22) has been supposed by some to be the same place as the “cave” in which Elijah lodged at Horeb, and where the Lord appeared to him in the still small voice (1Ki 19:9.)
The real summit of the Jebel Musa consists of “a small area of huge rocks, about 80 feet in diameter,” upon which there is now a chapel that has almost fallen down, and about 40 feet to the south-west a dilapidated mosque (Robinson, Palestine , vol. i. p. 153). Below this mosque, according to Seetzen ( Reise iii. pp. 83, 84), there is a very small grotto, into which you descend by several steps, and to which a large block of granite, about a fathom and a half long and six spans in height, serves as a roof.
According to the Mussulman tradition, which the Greek monks also accept, it was in this small grotto that Moses received the law; though other monks point out a “hole, just large enough for a man,” near the altar of the Elijah chapel, on the small plain upon the ridge of Sinai, above which the loftier peak rises about 700 feet, as the cave in which Elijah lodged on Horeb (Robinson, Pal. ut supra ).
Exo 33:18-23 Moses was emboldened by this, and now prayed to the Lord, “ Let me see Thy glory . ” What Moses desired to see, as the answer of God clearly shows, must have been something surpassing all former revelations of the glory of Jehovah (Exo 16:7, Exo 16:10; Exo 24:16-17), and even going beyond Jehovah’s talking with him face to face (Exo 33:11). When God talked with him face to face, or mouth to mouth, he merely saw a “similitude of Jehovah” (Num 12:8), a form which rendered the invisible being of God visible to the human eye, i.
e. , a manifestation of the divine glory in a certain form, and not the direct or essential glory of Jehovah, whilst the people saw this glory under the veil of a dark cloud, rendered luminous by fire, that is to say, they only saw its splendour as it shone through the cloud; and even the elders, at the time when the covenant was made, only saw the God of Israel in a certain form which hid from their eyes the essential being of God (Exo 24:10-11).
What Moses desired, therefore, was a sight of the glory or essential being of God, without any figure, and without a veil. Moses was urged to offer this prayer, as Calvin truly says, not by “ stulta curiositas, quae ut plurimum titillat hominum mentes, ut audacter penetrare tentent usque ad ultima caelorum arcana, ” but by “a desire to cross the chasm which had been made by the apostasy of the nation, that for the future he might have a firmer footing than the previous history had given him.
As so great a stress had been laid upon his own person in his present task of mediation between the offended Jehovah and the apostate nation, he felt that the separation, which existed between himself and Jehovah, introduced a disturbing element into his office. For if his own personal fellowship with Jehovah was not fully established, and raised above all possibility of disturbance, there could be no eternal foundation for the perpetuity of his mediation” ( Baumgarten ).
As a man called by God to be His servant, he was not yet the perfect mediator; but although he was faithful in all his house, it was only as a servant, called εἰς μαρτύριον τῶν λαληθησομένων (Heb 3:5), i. e. , as a herald of the saving revelations of God, preparing the way for the coming of the perfect Mediator. Jehovah therefore granted his request, but only so far as the limit existing between the infinite and holy God and finite and sinful man allowed.
“ I will make all My goodness pass before thy face, and proclaim the name of Jehovah before thee (בּשׁם קרא see at Gen 4:26), and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy. Thou canst not see My face, for man cannot see Me and live . ” The words וגו וחנּתי, although only connected with the previous clause by the cop .
ו, are to be understood in a causative sense, as expressing the reason why Moses’ request was granted, viz. , that it was an act of unconditional grace and compassion on the part of God, to which no man, not even Moses, could lay any just claim. The apostle Paul uses the words in the same sense in Rom 9:15, for the purpose of overthrowing the claims of self-righteous Jews to participate in the Messianic salvation.
- No mortal man can see the face of God and remain alive; for not only is the holy God a consuming fire to unholy man, but a limit has been set, in and with the σῶμα χοΐκόν and ψυχικόν (the earthly and psychical body) of man, between the infinite God, the absolute Spirit, and the human spirit clothed in an earthly body, which will only be removed by the “redemption of our body,” and our being clothed in a “spiritual body,” and which, so long as it lasts, renders a direct sight of the glory of God impossible. As our bodily eye is dazzled, and its power of vision destroyed, by looking directly at the brightness of the sun, so would our whole nature be destroyed by an unveiled sight of the brilliancy of the glory of God.
So long as we are clothed with this body, which was destined, indeed, from the very first to be transformed into the glorified state of the immortality of the spirit, but has become through the fall a prey to the corruption of death, we can only walk in faith, and only see God with the eye of faith, so far as He has revealed His glory to us in His works and His word. When we have become like God, and have been transformed into the “divine nature” (2Pe 1:4), then, and not till then, shall we see Him as He is; then we shall see His glory without a veil, and live before Him for ever.
For this reason Moses had to content himself with the passing by of the glory of God before his face, and with the revelation of the name of Jehovah through the medium of the word, in which God discloses His inmost being, and, so to speak, His whole heart to faith. In Exo 33:22 “My glory” is used for “all My goodness,” and in Exo 34:6 it is stated that Jehovah passed by before the face of Moses.
טוּב is not to be understood in the sense of beautiful, or beauty, but signifies goodness; not the brilliancy which strikes the senses, but the spiritual and ethical nature of the Divine Being. For the manifestation of Jehovah, which passed before Moses, was intended unquestionably to reveal nothing else than what Jehovah expressed in the proclamation of His name.
The manifested glory of the Lord would so surely be followed by the destruction of man, that even Moses needed to be protected before it (Exo 33:21, Exo 33:22). Whilst Jehovah, therefore, allowed him to come to a place upon the rock near Him, i. e. , upon the summit of Sinai (Exo 34:2), He said that He would put him in a cleft of the rock whilst He was passing by, and cover him with His hand when He had gone by, that he might see His back, because His face could not be seen.
The back, as contrasted with the face, signifies the reflection of the glory of God that had just passed by. The words are transferred anthropomorphically from man to God, because human language and human thought can only conceive of the nature of the absolute Spirit according to the analogy of the human form. As the inward nature of man manifests itself in his face, and the sight of his back gives only an imperfect and outward view of him, so Moses saw only the back and not the face of Jehovah.
It is impossible to put more into human words concerning this unparalleled vision, which far surpasses all human thought and comprehension. According to Exo 34:2, the place where Moses stood by the Lord was at the top (the head) of Sinai, and no more can be determined with certainty concerning it. The cleft in the rock (Exo 33:22) has been supposed by some to be the same place as the “cave” in which Elijah lodged at Horeb, and where the Lord appeared to him in the still small voice (1Ki 19:9.)
The real summit of the Jebel Musa consists of “a small area of huge rocks, about 80 feet in diameter,” upon which there is now a chapel that has almost fallen down, and about 40 feet to the south-west a dilapidated mosque (Robinson, Palestine , vol. i. p. 153). Below this mosque, according to Seetzen ( Reise iii. pp. 83, 84), there is a very small grotto, into which you descend by several steps, and to which a large block of granite, about a fathom and a half long and six spans in height, serves as a roof.
According to the Mussulman tradition, which the Greek monks also accept, it was in this small grotto that Moses received the law; though other monks point out a “hole, just large enough for a man,” near the altar of the Elijah chapel, on the small plain upon the ridge of Sinai, above which the loftier peak rises about 700 feet, as the cave in which Elijah lodged on Horeb (Robinson, Pal. ut supra ).