Isaiah son of Amoz
Woe to Those Who Go Down to Egypt: The Lord Alone Defends Zion
The Lord condemns His people’s trust in Egypt’s visible strength and calls them to return to Him, because He alone defends Zion and defeats Assyria by His own power.
Reading a chapter
What this page is: Each chapter page shows the big idea, the argument flow, key original-language terms, doctrine connections, and passage units, all in one place.
How to use it: Start with the Overview tab to get the chapter's main point. Then move to Passages to study individual units, or Language to trace key terms.
Going deeper: The Doctrines and Motifs tabs show how this chapter connects to the broader biblical story.
The Lord condemns His people’s trust in Egypt’s visible strength and calls them to return to Him, because He alone defends Zion and defeats Assyria by His own power.
The chapter argues that visible military strength cannot save when it replaces trust in the Lord, because Egypt is flesh and not spirit, while the Lord alone is wise, sovereign, protective, and able to defeat Assyria.
Judah and Jerusalem, especially leaders and people tempted to seek military protection from Egypt against Assyria.
The chapter belongs to the late eighth-century BC Assyrian crisis. Judah faced imperial pressure and was tempted to rely on Egypt’s military resources, especially horses, chariots, and horsemen.
The Lord condemns His people’s trust in Egypt’s visible strength and calls them to return to Him, because He alone defends Zion and defeats Assyria by His own power.
Isaiah son of Amoz
Judah and Jerusalem, especially leaders and people tempted to seek military protection from Egypt against Assyria.
The chapter belongs to the late eighth-century BC Assyrian crisis. Judah faced imperial pressure and was tempted to rely on Egypt’s military resources, especially horses, chariots, and horsemen.
- Fear of Assyria, urgency for visible defense, diplomatic temptation, military anxiety, and distrust of prophetic instruction shape the chapter’s pressure.
Egypt was associated with horses, chariots, and military prestige. In the ancient Near Eastern world, such military assets represented visible power. Isaiah exposes that visible power as inadequate when it is trusted instead of the Lord.
Isaiah 31 recalls the covenant danger of returning to Egypt-like dependence. Israel had been delivered from Egypt by the Lord, yet Judah now looks back to Egypt for deliverance from Assyria. The chapter insists that salvation belongs to the Lord alone.
Isaiah 31 moves from a woe against Judah’s reliance on Egypt’s horses and chariots, to the theological contrast between human flesh and the Lord’s Spirit, to the Lord’s fierce and tender defense of Zion, to a call for deep return, and finally to the fall of Assyria by a sword not of man.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
The chapter presses God’s people away from visible but mortal securities and toward deep repentance, idol rejection, and confident trust in the Lord’s defending presence.
Judah trusts Egypt’s horses, chariots, and horsemen instead of looking to the Holy One of Israel.
Egypt is human and its horses are flesh, while the Lord is wise and acts with decisive power.
The Lord will fight for Mount Zion and protect Jerusalem like a fearless lion and hovering birds.
The people are called to return deeply and abandon idols made by their hands.
Assyria falls by a sword not of man, and the Lord’s fire remains in Zion.
- 31:1: Judah’s reliance on Egypt’s military strength is condemned because it replaces seeking the Lord.
- 31:2-3: The Lord’s wisdom and power expose the weakness of Egypt and the folly of those who rely on it.
- 31:4-5: The Lord promises fearless and protective defense of Jerusalem.
- 31:6-7: Judah must return to the Lord and cast away the idols made by sinful hands.
- 31:8-9: The oppressor will fall by a sword not of man, because the Lord’s fire is in Zion.
Theological Argument
The chapter argues that visible military strength cannot save when it replaces trust in the Lord, because Egypt is flesh and not spirit, while the Lord alone is wise, sovereign, protective, and able to defeat Assyria.
From Egypt-trust to divine exposure, from flesh versus spirit to the LORD’s defense of Zion, from repentance and idol rejection to Assyria’s divine defeat.
- 1.Trusting visible strength while refusing to seek the LORD is covenant rebellion.
- 2.The LORD’s wisdom is superior to all human strategy.
- 3.Human power cannot bear divine weight.
- 4.When God acts in judgment, both false saviors and those who depend on them collapse together.
- 5.The LORD’s protection of Zion is both fierce and tender.
- 6.True return requires rejecting rival trusts.
- 7.The LORD defeats the enemy His people feared without needing the help they sought.
Theological Focus
- False Trust in Visible Power
- The Holy One of Israel
- Flesh Versus Spirit
- Divine Wisdom
- The Lord’s Defense of Zion
- Repentance and Idol Rejection
- Divine Victory Over Assyria
- The Lord alone is sufficient to defend, deliver, and defeat the enemy His people fear.
- Human power is flesh, not spirit, and cannot serve as ultimate refuge.
- The Lord is wise and will act against evil, exposing the folly of unbelieving strategy.
- The people are commanded to return deeply to the Lord against whom they have rebelled.
- Idols made by human hands must be cast away as sinful rival trusts.
- The Lord protects Zion with both fearless power and sheltering care.
- Assyria falls by divine action, and false helpers collapse under the Lord’s hand.
- Failure to seek the Holy One is the core theological failure beneath Judah’s political choice.
Theological Themes
Judah’s reliance on Egypt exposes the human tendency to trust what can be counted, seen, and mobilized instead of the unseen Lord.
The chapter rebukes failure to look to the Holy One of Israel, grounding the crisis in covenant theology rather than mere diplomacy.
Egypt and its horses are flesh, but the Lord is not a creaturely resource. Salvation requires dependence on God, not human strength.
The Lord is wise and will not be outmaneuvered by human plans, alliances, or imperial threats.
God’s protection is portrayed with both lion-like fearlessness and bird-like sheltering care.
Returning to the Lord includes rejecting the idols and rival securities made by human hands.
The enemy falls by a sword not of man, demonstrating that deliverance belongs to the Lord.
Covenant Significance
Isaiah 31 exposes Judah’s covenant breach in seeking Egypt rather than the Holy One of Israel, while preserving covenant hope in the Lord’s defense of Zion, call to return, and judgment of Assyria.
- Covenant breach - Judah goes down to Egypt for help instead of looking to the Holy One of Israel.
- Covenant memory - Egypt’s role evokes Israel’s past bondage and deliverance, making Judah’s return to Egypt-like dependence spiritually tragic.
- Covenant warning - Both helper and helped will fall when the Lord stretches out His hand.
- Covenant protection - The Lord of hosts will defend Mount Zion and Jerusalem.
- Covenant repentance - The people are called to return deeply to the One against whom they have revolted.
- Covenant purification - Each person will reject idols of silver and gold made by sinful hands.
- Covenant vindication - Assyria will fall by divine power, showing that the Lord is Zion’s true defender.
Canonical Connections
The Lord condemns His people’s trust in Egypt’s visible strength and calls them to return to Him, because He alone defends Zion and defeats Assyria by His own power.
Cross References
For though we walk in the flesh, we don’t wage war according to the flesh; for the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but mighty before God to the throwing down of strongholds, throwing down imaginations and every high thing that...
Having stripped the principalities and the powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world’s rulers of the darkness of this age, and against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore...
Therefore he is also able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, seeing that he lives forever to make intercession for them.
That night, Yahweh’s angel went out, and struck one hundred eighty-five thousand in the camp of the Assyrians. When men arose early in the morning, behold, these were all dead bodies.
When you go out to battle against your enemies, and see horses, chariots, and a people more numerous than you, you shall not be afraid of them; for Yahweh your God is with you, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.
Yahweh will fight for you, and you shall be still.”
Assyria can’t save us. We won’t ride on horses; neither will we say any more to the work of our hands, ‘Our gods!’ for in you the fatherless finds mercy.”
“Woe to the rebellious children”, says Yahweh, “who take counsel, but not from me; and who make an alliance, but not with my Spirit, that they may add sin to sin, who set out to go down into Egypt, and have not asked my advice, to...
The gospel clarity in Isaiah 31 appears in the collapse of every false refuge and the Lord’s promise to defend, rescue, and deliver by His own power. Judah’s instinct to trust Egypt reflects the sinner’s instinct to seek salvation in visible strength rather than in God. But Egypt is human, not God; its horses are flesh, not spirit. The gospel announces that God Himself has acted in Christ to save those who cannot save themselves, calling them to return from idols and trust the deliverance He provides.
- Human need - The people seek help from Egypt and fail to look to the Holy One of Israel.
- False refuge exposed - Egypt is human, not God, and its horses are flesh, not spirit.
- Divine initiative - The Lord will come down to fight for Mount Zion and defend Jerusalem.
- Repentance - The people are commanded to return deeply and cast away idols.
- Deliverance - Assyria falls by a sword not of man, showing salvation by divine power.
For though we walk in the flesh, we don’t wage war according to the flesh; for the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but mighty before God to the throwing down of strongholds, throwing down imaginations and every high thing that...
Having stripped the principalities and the powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world’s rulers of the darkness of this age, and against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore...
Therefore he is also able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, seeing that he lives forever to make intercession for them.
Primary Emphasis
Isaiah 31 contributes to the canonical movement fulfilled in Christ by exposing the failure of fleshly strength, calling God’s people back to the Lord, and portraying divine deliverance as something God accomplishes without human saviors. Christ fulfills the true refuge, divine warrior, shepherding protector, and victorious deliverer to whom God’s people must look.
Chapter Contribution
The chapter argues that visible military strength cannot save when it replaces trust in the Lord, because Egypt is flesh and not spirit, while the Lord alone is wise, sovereign, protective, and able to defeat Assyria.
The Lord actively defends and preserves His covenant city.
God’s people must rely on the Lord rather than human strength.
Restoration requires turning back from deep rebellion.
God defeats oppressive powers by His own authority.
The Lord alone is sufficient to defend, deliver, and defeat the enemy His people fear.
Human power is flesh, not spirit, and cannot serve as ultimate refuge.
The Lord is wise and will act against evil, exposing the folly of unbelieving strategy.
The people are commanded to return deeply to the Lord against whom they have rebelled.
Idols made by human hands must be cast away as sinful rival trusts.
The Lord protects Zion with both fearless power and sheltering care.
Assyria falls by divine action, and false helpers collapse under the Lord’s hand.
Failure to seek the Holy One is the core theological failure beneath Judah’s political choice.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
- The chapter presses God’s people away from visible but mortal securities and toward deep repentance, idol rejection, and confident trust in the Lord’s defending presence.
Sense woe, alas, prophetic cry of warning and judgment
Definition A prophetic exclamation announcing danger, lament, and divine judgment.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon woe, alas, prophetic cry of warning and judgment
Why it matters The chapter begins with a woe, showing that Egypt-trust is not a neutral policy choice but covenant danger.
Sense to go down, descend
Definition To descend or go down, often geographically or metaphorically.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon to go down, descend
Why it matters Going down to Egypt carries covenant and redemptive-historical weight, suggesting a movement toward old patterns of dependence.
Sense Egypt
Definition Egypt, ancient regional power and former place of Israel’s bondage.
References Isaiah 31:1, 31:3
Lexicon Egypt
Why it matters Egypt represents visible military refuge and the tragic temptation to seek salvation from the place God had once delivered His people from.
Sense help, assistance, aid
Definition Aid or assistance in need.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon help, assistance, aid
Why it matters The chapter asks where help truly comes from: Egypt’s military resources or the Lord Himself.
Sense horses
Definition Horses, often associated with military power and mobility.
References Isaiah 31:1, 31:3
Lexicon horses
Why it matters Judah relies on horses as visible military strength, but Isaiah exposes them as flesh, not spirit.
Sense chariotry, chariots, vehicle force
Definition Chariots or chariot forces used in military power.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon chariotry, chariots, vehicle force
Why it matters Chariots symbolize the visible and countable power Judah trusts instead of the Lord.
Sense horsemen, cavalrymen
Definition Mounted soldiers or cavalry forces.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon horsemen, cavalrymen
Why it matters Judah is impressed by strong horsemen, but the chapter teaches that visible strength cannot replace seeking the Lord.
Sense the Holy One of Israel
Definition A major Isaianic title emphasizing the LORD’s holiness and covenant relationship to Israel.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon the Holy One of Israel
Why it matters The core failure is that Judah does not look to the Holy One of Israel or seek the Lord.
Form in passage Qal · Perfect · 3rd Person · Common · Plural What is this?
Sense to seek, inquire, consult
Definition To seek, inquire of, or consult.
References Isaiah 31:1
Lexicon to seek, inquire, consult
Why it matters Judah’s failure is relational and covenantal: they do not seek the Lord in their crisis.
Sense wise, skillful, discerning
Definition Possessing wisdom, skill, or discernment.
References Isaiah 31:2
Lexicon wise, skillful, discerning
Why it matters The Lord is wise and cannot be outmaneuvered by human strategy or diplomatic calculation.
Sense evil, calamity, disaster
Definition Evil morally or disaster judicially, depending on context.
References Isaiah 31:2
Lexicon evil, calamity, disaster
Why it matters The Lord brings disaster against evildoers and false helpers, showing that His judgment is active and wise.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense flesh, creaturely mortality
Definition Flesh, body, or mortal creaturely life.
References Isaiah 31:3
Lexicon flesh, creaturely mortality
Why it matters Egypt’s horses are flesh, exposing the limitation and mortality of the power Judah trusts.
Sense spirit, breath, wind
Definition Spirit, breath, or wind; in theological contrast, divine life and power beyond flesh.
References Isaiah 31:3
Lexicon spirit, breath, wind
Why it matters The contrast between flesh and spirit is central to Isaiah’s exposure of Egypt’s inability to save.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense hand, power, agency
Definition Hand as physical member or symbol of power and action.
References Isaiah 31:3
Lexicon hand, power, agency
Why it matters When the Lord stretches out His hand, human helpers and those helped collapse together.
Sense lion
Definition A lion, symbolizing strength, fearlessness, and predatory power.
References Isaiah 31:4
Lexicon lion
Why it matters The Lord’s defense of Zion is pictured as lion-like fearlessness before human opposition.
Sense young lion
Definition A young lion, often emphasizing strength and ferocity.
References Isaiah 31:4
Lexicon young lion
Why it matters The young lion imagery intensifies the Lord’s unshaken resolve to fight for Zion.
Sense birds
Definition Birds, often used in imagery of movement, hovering, or protection.
References Isaiah 31:5
Lexicon birds
Why it matters The hovering birds image portrays the Lord’s protective care over Jerusalem.
Form in passage Qal · Imperfect · 3rd Person · Masculine · Singular What is this?
Sense to cover, shield, defend
Definition To protect, cover, or defend.
References Isaiah 31:5
Lexicon to cover, shield, defend
Why it matters The Lord promises active defense of Jerusalem, answering Judah’s fear-driven search for Egypt’s protection.
Sense to deliver, rescue, snatch away
Definition To rescue or deliver from danger.
References Isaiah 31:5
Lexicon to deliver, rescue, snatch away
Why it matters The Lord Himself will deliver Jerusalem, accomplishing what Egypt cannot.
Form in passage Qal · Infinitive absolute What is this?
Sense to pass over, spare, protect
Definition To pass over or spare, associated with protective deliverance.
References Isaiah 31:5
Lexicon to pass over, spare, protect
Why it matters The term evokes protective deliverance and strengthens the Exodus resonance of the Lord saving His people without Egypt.
Form in passage Qal · Sequential imperfect · 2nd Person · Masculine · Plural What is this?
Sense to return, turn back, repent
Definition To turn back or return, often used for repentance.
References Isaiah 31:6
Lexicon to return, turn back, repent
Why it matters The chapter’s call is not merely to stop trusting Egypt but to return deeply to the Lord.
Form in passage Feminine · Singular · Absolute What is this?
Sense turning aside, apostasy, revolt
Definition A turning aside or revolt from what is right.
References Isaiah 31:6
Lexicon turning aside, apostasy, revolt
Why it matters Isaiah describes Judah’s rebellion as deep, showing that the return must be equally deep.
Form in passage Masculine · Plural · Construct What is this?
Sense idols, worthless gods
Definition Worthless idols or false gods.
References Isaiah 31:7
Lexicon idols, worthless gods
Why it matters Returning to the Lord requires casting away the rival trusts made by sinful hands.
Sense sword
Definition A sword or instrument of warfare and judgment.
References Isaiah 31:8
Lexicon sword
Why it matters Assyria falls by a sword not of man, emphasizing divine rather than human deliverance.
Sense Assyria
Definition The Assyrian empire, the major imperial threat in Isaiah’s setting.
References Isaiah 31:8
Lexicon Assyria
Why it matters The fall of Assyria by divine power proves that Judah did not need Egypt as savior.
Sense fire
Definition Fire, often associated with presence, purification, judgment, or consuming power.
References Isaiah 31:9
Lexicon fire
Why it matters The Lord’s fire in Zion signals His holy presence and judgment against the oppressor.
Sense furnace, oven
Definition A furnace or oven, associated here with fiery divine presence and judgment.
References Isaiah 31:9
Lexicon furnace, oven
Why it matters The Lord’s furnace in Jerusalem closes the chapter with an image of holy, consuming presence.
Lexicon data: MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML (CC0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (CC BY 4.0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon (CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible Data (CC BY 4.0) · Full details
C.F. Keil & F. Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (1861–91) — public domain
The chapter presses God’s people away from visible but mortal securities and toward deep repentance, idol rejection, and confident trust in the Lord’s defending presence.
- Isaiah 31 warns against trusting visible strength, refusing to seek the Lord, and keeping idols while claiming covenant security.
- Do not trust what is many and strong simply because it is visible. - Judah relies on Egypt’s many chariots and strong horsemen.
- Do not seek help from human power while neglecting the Holy One of Israel. - The people do not look to the Holy One or seek the Lord.
- Do not confuse flesh with spirit. - Egypt is human, and its horses are flesh, not spirit.
- Do not assume false helpers can stand when the Lord stretches out His hand. - Both helper and helped will fall together.
- Do not speak of returning to God while keeping the idols Your hands have made. - The call to return is paired with casting away silver and gold idols.
- Do not believe the enemy is stronger than the Lord’s ability to defend His people. - Assyria falls by a sword not of man.
- Treating Isaiah 31 as a simple rejection of all military resources. - The chapter condemns reliance on military strength instead of the Lord. Its issue is misplaced trust, not the mere existence of horses or chariots.
- Reading Egypt only as a political actor without theological significance. - Egypt represents a rival refuge and evokes Israel’s old bondage, making Judah’s dependence spiritually charged.
- Assuming the flesh-Spirit contrast is merely physical versus nonphysical. - The contrast exposes creaturely weakness before divine power. Egypt is mortal, limited, and unable to save.
- Separating the promise of Zion’s defense from the call to repentance. - The Lord’s defense does not excuse rebellion. The people are explicitly called to return and reject idols.
- Turning the lion and bird images into sentimental comfort only. - The lion image emphasizes fearless divine warfare, while the bird image emphasizes protective covering. Both reveal the Lord’s active defense.
- Treating Assyria’s fall as merely historical without theological force. - Assyria’s fall demonstrates the core claim of the chapter: the Lord, not Egypt, is the true deliverer.
- What is my Egypt, the visible source of strength I run to before I seek the Lord?
- Where am I impressed by what is many, strong, measurable, and immediate while neglecting the Holy One of Israel?
- How am I tempted to treat flesh as though it were spirit, expecting human strength to do what only God can do?
- What would it mean for me to return deeply, not merely adjust behavior outwardly?
- Which idols of silver and gold, costly, crafted, and familiar, need to be cast away as rival trusts?
- Do I believe the Lord can defend His people with both lion-like power and sheltering care?
- Where has fear of Assyria made me compromise with Egypt?
- Preach Isaiah 31 as a searching warning against visible saviors. The sermon should expose Egypt-trust and call people to look to the Holy One of Israel.
- Church leaders must not measure security merely by budgets, buildings, numbers, influence, programs, or alliances. These may be useful tools, but they become Egypt when trusted as saviors.
- Use the chapter to help anxious people identify the difference between wise help and ultimate refuge. Egypt-trust often appears when fear demands visible control.
- Disciple believers to ask not only, 'What resources do we have?' but, 'Have we sought the Lord?'
- The call to return deeply shows that repentance must reach beneath behavior to allegiance. The hands must release the idols the heart has trusted.
- Isaiah 31 trains prayer that confesses misplaced trust, seeks the Holy One, and asks for deliverance only God can give.
- The Lord’s lion and bird imagery comforts fearful believers: God is not weak, indifferent, or distant. He fiercely and tenderly defends His purposes.
- A people who stop trusting Egypt become a witness that the living God is stronger than the visible powers others fear.
The chapter presses God’s people away from visible but mortal securities and toward deep repentance, idol rejection, and confident trust in the Lord’s defending presence.
The Biblical World
Chapter At A Glance
Isaiah 31 moves from a woe against Judah’s reliance on Egypt’s horses and chariots, to the theological contrast between human flesh and the Lord’s Spirit, to the Lord’s fierce and tender defense of Zion, to a call for deep return, and finally to the fall of Assyria by a sword not of man.
Isaiah 31 exposes Judah’s covenant breach in seeking Egypt rather than the Holy One of Israel, while preserving covenant hope in the Lord’s defense of Zion, call to return, and judgment of Assyria.
The gospel clarity in Isaiah 31 appears in the collapse of every false refuge and the Lord’s promise to defend, rescue, and deliver by His own power. Judah’s instinct to trust Egypt reflects the sinner’s instinct to seek salvation in visible strength rather than in God. But Egypt is human, not God; its horses are flesh, not spirit. The gospel announces that God Himself has acted in Christ to save those who cannot save themselves, calling them to return from idols and trust the deliverance He provides.
Focus Points
- False Trust in Visible Power
- The Holy One of Israel
- Flesh Versus Spirit
- Divine Wisdom
- The Lord’s Defense of Zion
- Repentance and Idol Rejection
- Divine Victory Over Assyria
- The Lord alone is sufficient to defend, deliver, and defeat the enemy His people fear.
- Human power is flesh, not spirit, and cannot serve as ultimate refuge.
- The Lord is wise and will act against evil, exposing the folly of unbelieving strategy.
- The people are commanded to return deeply to the Lord against whom they have rebelled.
- Idols made by human hands must be cast away as sinful rival trusts.
- The Lord protects Zion with both fearless power and sheltering care.
- Assyria falls by divine action, and false helpers collapse under the Lord’s hand.
- Failure to seek the Holy One is the core theological failure beneath Judah’s political choice.
Passages
Chapter opening: Isaiah 31:1-9
Isa 31:6 On the ground of this half terrible, half comforting picture of the future, the call to repentance is now addressed to the people of the prophet’s own time. “Then turn, O sons of Israel, to Him from whom men have so deeply departed. ” Strictly speaking, “to Him with regard to whom (אשׁר) ye are deeply fallen away” ( he‛ĕmı̄q , as in Hos 9:9, and sârâh , that which is alienated, alienation, as in Isa 1:5); the transition to the third person is like the reverse in Isa 1:29.
This call to repentance the prophet strengthens by two powerful motives drawn from the future.
Isa 31:7 The first is, that idolatry would one day be recognised in all its abomination, and put away. “For in that day they will abhor every one their silver idols and their gold idols, which your hands have made you for a sin,” i.e., to commit sin and repent, with the preponderance of the latter idea, as in Hos 8:11 (compare 1Ki 13:34). חטא, a second accusative to עשׂוּ, indicating the result. The prospect is the same as that held out in Isa 30:22; Isa 27:9; Isa 17:8; Isa 2:20.
Isa 31:8-9 The second motive is, that Israel will not be rescued by men, but by Jehovah alone; so that even He from whom they have now so deeply fallen will prove Himself the only true ground of confidence. “And Asshur falls by a sword not of a man, and a sword not of a man will devour him; and he flees before a sword, and his young men become tributary. And his rock, for fear will it pass away, and his princes be frightened away by the flags: the saying of Jehovah, who has His fire in Zion, and His furnace in Jerusalem.
” The lxx and Jerome render this falsely φεύξεται οὐκ (לא) ἀπὸ προσώπου μαχαίρας. לו is an ethical dative, and the prophet intentionally writes “before a sword” without any article, to suggest the idea of the unbounded, infinite, awful (cf. , Isa 28:2, beyâd ; Psalter , vol. i. p. 15). A sword is drawn without any human intervention, and before this Asshur falls, or at least so many of the Assyrians as are unable to save themselves by flight.
The power of Asshur is for ever broken; even its young men will henceforth become tributary, or perform feudal service. By “his rock” most commentators understand the rock upon which the fugitive would gladly have taken refuge, but did not dare (Rosenmüller, Gesenius, Knobel, etc.) ; others, again, the military force of Asshur, as its supposed invincible refuge (Saad.
, etc.) ; others, the apparently indestructible might of Asshur generally (Vulgate, Rashi, Hitzig). But the presence of “his princes” in the parallel clause makes it most natural to refer “his rock” to the king; and this reference is established with certainty by what Isa 32:2 affirms of the king and princes of Judah. Luther also renders it thus: und jr Fels wird fur furcht wegzihen (and their rock will withdraw for fear).
Sennacherib really did hurry back to Assyria after the catastrophe in a most rapid flight. Minnēs are the standards of Asshur, which the commanders of the army fly away from in terror, without attempting to rally those that were scattered. Thus speaks Jehovah, and this is what He decrees who has His 'ūr and tannūr in Jerusalem. We cannot suppose that the allusion here is to the fire and hearth of the sacrifices; for tannūr does not mean a hearth, but a furnace (from nūr , to burn).
The reference is to the light of the divine presence, which was outwardly a devouring fire for the enemies of Jerusalem, an unapproachable red-hot furnace ( ignis et caminus qui devorat peccatores et ligna, faenum stipulamque consumit : Jerome).
Isa 31:8-9 The second motive is, that Israel will not be rescued by men, but by Jehovah alone; so that even He from whom they have now so deeply fallen will prove Himself the only true ground of confidence. “And Asshur falls by a sword not of a man, and a sword not of a man will devour him; and he flees before a sword, and his young men become tributary. And his rock, for fear will it pass away, and his princes be frightened away by the flags: the saying of Jehovah, who has His fire in Zion, and His furnace in Jerusalem.
” The lxx and Jerome render this falsely φεύξεται οὐκ (לא) ἀπὸ προσώπου μαχαίρας. לו is an ethical dative, and the prophet intentionally writes “before a sword” without any article, to suggest the idea of the unbounded, infinite, awful (cf. , Isa 28:2, beyâd ; Psalter , vol. i. p. 15). A sword is drawn without any human intervention, and before this Asshur falls, or at least so many of the Assyrians as are unable to save themselves by flight.
The power of Asshur is for ever broken; even its young men will henceforth become tributary, or perform feudal service. By “his rock” most commentators understand the rock upon which the fugitive would gladly have taken refuge, but did not dare (Rosenmüller, Gesenius, Knobel, etc.) ; others, again, the military force of Asshur, as its supposed invincible refuge (Saad.
, etc.) ; others, the apparently indestructible might of Asshur generally (Vulgate, Rashi, Hitzig). But the presence of “his princes” in the parallel clause makes it most natural to refer “his rock” to the king; and this reference is established with certainty by what Isa 32:2 affirms of the king and princes of Judah. Luther also renders it thus: und jr Fels wird fur furcht wegzihen (and their rock will withdraw for fear).
Sennacherib really did hurry back to Assyria after the catastrophe in a most rapid flight. Minnēs are the standards of Asshur, which the commanders of the army fly away from in terror, without attempting to rally those that were scattered. Thus speaks Jehovah, and this is what He decrees who has His 'ūr and tannūr in Jerusalem. We cannot suppose that the allusion here is to the fire and hearth of the sacrifices; for tannūr does not mean a hearth, but a furnace (from nūr , to burn).
The reference is to the light of the divine presence, which was outwardly a devouring fire for the enemies of Jerusalem, an unapproachable red-hot furnace ( ignis et caminus qui devorat peccatores et ligna, faenum stipulamque consumit : Jerome).
Isa 32:1-2 For Judah, sifted, delivered, and purified, there now begins a new ear. Righteous government, as a blessing for the people, is the first beneficent fruit. “Behold, the king will reign according to righteousness; and the princes, according to right will they command. And every one will be like a shelter from the wind, and a covert from the storm; like water-brooks in a dry place, like the shadow of a gigantic rock in a languishing land.
” The kingdom of Asshur is for ever destroyed; but the kingdom of Judah rises out of the state of confusion into which it has fallen through its God - forgetting policy and disregard of justice. King and princes now rule according to the standards that have been divinely appointed and revealed. The Lamed in ūlesârı̄m (and the princes) is that of reference ( quod attinet ad , as in Psa 16:3 and Ecc 9:4), the exponent of the usual casus abs.
( Ges . §146, 2); and the two other Lameds are equivalent to κατά, secundum (as in Jer 30:11). The figures in Isa 32:2 are the same as in Isa 25:4. The rock of Asshur (i. e. , Sennacherib) has departed, and the princes of Asshur have deserted their standards, merely to save themselves. The king and princes of Judah are now the defence of their nation, and overshadow it like colossal walls of rock.
This is the first fruit of the blessing.
Isa 32:1-2 For Judah, sifted, delivered, and purified, there now begins a new ear. Righteous government, as a blessing for the people, is the first beneficent fruit. “Behold, the king will reign according to righteousness; and the princes, according to right will they command. And every one will be like a shelter from the wind, and a covert from the storm; like water-brooks in a dry place, like the shadow of a gigantic rock in a languishing land.
” The kingdom of Asshur is for ever destroyed; but the kingdom of Judah rises out of the state of confusion into which it has fallen through its God - forgetting policy and disregard of justice. King and princes now rule according to the standards that have been divinely appointed and revealed. The Lamed in ūlesârı̄m (and the princes) is that of reference ( quod attinet ad , as in Psa 16:3 and Ecc 9:4), the exponent of the usual casus abs.
( Ges . §146, 2); and the two other Lameds are equivalent to κατά, secundum (as in Jer 30:11). The figures in Isa 32:2 are the same as in Isa 25:4. The rock of Asshur (i. e. , Sennacherib) has departed, and the princes of Asshur have deserted their standards, merely to save themselves. The king and princes of Judah are now the defence of their nation, and overshadow it like colossal walls of rock.
This is the first fruit of the blessing.
Isa 32:3-4 The second is an opened understanding, following upon the ban of hardening. “And the eyes of the seeing no more are closed, and the ears of the hearing attend. And the heart of the hurried understands to know, and the tongue of stammerers speaks clear things with readiness. ” It is not physical miracles that are predicted here, but a spiritual change.
The present judgment of hardening will be repealed: this is what Isa 32:3 affirms. The spiritual defects, from which many suffer who do not belong to the worst, will be healed: this is the statement in Isa 32:4. The form תּשׁעינה is not the future of שׁעה here, as in Isa 31:1; Isa 22:4; Isa 17:7-8 (in the sense of, they will no longer stare about restlessly and without aim), but of שׁעה = שׁעע, a metaplastic future of the latter, in the sense of, to be smeared over to closed (see Isa 29:9; Isa 6:10; cf.
, tach in Isa 44:18). On qâshabh (the kal of which is only met with here), see at Isa 21:7. The times succeeding the hardening, of which Isaiah is speaking here, are “the last times,” as Isa 6:1-13 clearly shows; though it does not therefore follow that the king mentioned in Isa 32:1 (as in Isa 11:1.) is the Messiah Himself. In Isa 32:1 the prophet merely affirms, that Israel as a national commonwealth will then be governed in a manner well pleasing to God; here he predicts that Israel as a national congregation will be delivered from the judgment of not seeing with seeing eyes, and not hearing with hearing ears, and that it will be delivered from defects of weakness also.
The nimhârı̄m are those that fall headlong, the precipitate, hurrying, or rash; and the עלּגים, stammerers, are not scoffers (Isa 28:7. , Isa 19:20), as Knobel and Drechsler maintain, but such as are unable to think and speak with distinctness and certainty, more especially concerning the exalted things of God. The former would now have the gifts of discernment ( yâbhı̄n ), to perceive things in their true nature, and to distinguish under all circumstances that which is truly profitable ( lâda‛ath ); the latter would be able to express themselves suitably, with refinement, clearness, and worthiness.
Tsachōth (old ed. tsâchōth ) signifies that which is light, transparent; not merely intelligible, but refined and elegant. תּמהר gives the adverbial idea to ledabbēr (Ewald, §§285, a ).
Isa 32:3-4 The second is an opened understanding, following upon the ban of hardening. “And the eyes of the seeing no more are closed, and the ears of the hearing attend. And the heart of the hurried understands to know, and the tongue of stammerers speaks clear things with readiness. ” It is not physical miracles that are predicted here, but a spiritual change.
The present judgment of hardening will be repealed: this is what Isa 32:3 affirms. The spiritual defects, from which many suffer who do not belong to the worst, will be healed: this is the statement in Isa 32:4. The form תּשׁעינה is not the future of שׁעה here, as in Isa 31:1; Isa 22:4; Isa 17:7-8 (in the sense of, they will no longer stare about restlessly and without aim), but of שׁעה = שׁעע, a metaplastic future of the latter, in the sense of, to be smeared over to closed (see Isa 29:9; Isa 6:10; cf.
, tach in Isa 44:18). On qâshabh (the kal of which is only met with here), see at Isa 21:7. The times succeeding the hardening, of which Isaiah is speaking here, are “the last times,” as Isa 6:1-13 clearly shows; though it does not therefore follow that the king mentioned in Isa 32:1 (as in Isa 11:1.) is the Messiah Himself. In Isa 32:1 the prophet merely affirms, that Israel as a national commonwealth will then be governed in a manner well pleasing to God; here he predicts that Israel as a national congregation will be delivered from the judgment of not seeing with seeing eyes, and not hearing with hearing ears, and that it will be delivered from defects of weakness also.
The nimhârı̄m are those that fall headlong, the precipitate, hurrying, or rash; and the עלּגים, stammerers, are not scoffers (Isa 28:7. , Isa 19:20), as Knobel and Drechsler maintain, but such as are unable to think and speak with distinctness and certainty, more especially concerning the exalted things of God. The former would now have the gifts of discernment ( yâbhı̄n ), to perceive things in their true nature, and to distinguish under all circumstances that which is truly profitable ( lâda‛ath ); the latter would be able to express themselves suitably, with refinement, clearness, and worthiness.
Tsachōth (old ed. tsâchōth ) signifies that which is light, transparent; not merely intelligible, but refined and elegant. תּמהר gives the adverbial idea to ledabbēr (Ewald, §§285, a ).